ORIGINAL

 

Prevalence and risk factors of common mental disorders among teachers

Prevalencia y factores de riesgo de trastornos mentales comunes en profesores

 

 

Mary Sandra Carlotto^a and Sheila Gonçalves Câmara^b

^a Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
^b Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil

This research has been financially supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brasil).

Correspondence

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at identifying the prevalence of Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) in teachers and at analyzing associations between sociodemographic, occupational, and psychosocial factors and CMDs. This was a cross-sectional study with a random sample of 679 teachers, distributed in 37 elementary schools located in a city in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre (in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). The instruments used were the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20); the Battery of Psychosocial Risk Assessment to evaluate role ambiguity, social support, self-efficacy, autonomy, interpersonal conflicts, role conflict, and overload; and a questionnaire to assess sociodemographic and occupational variables. Results showed a 29.7% prevalence of CMDs. Three-stage hierarchical logistic regression was performed. Having role ambiguity, overload, low level of social support, and low perceived self-efficacy were associated with CMDs. Greater attention should be given to psychosocial threats in the school context, since these kinds of variables were associated with CMDs in teachers.

Key words: Common mental disorders. School teachers. Occupational health.

---

RESUMEN

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar la prevalencia de trastornos mentales comunes (TMC) en profesores y analizar las asociaciones entre factores sociodemográficos, ocupacionales y psicosociales y TMC. Fue realizado un estudio transversal con una muestra aleatoria de 679 profesores distribuidos en 37 escuelas de enseñanza primaria localizadas en una ciudad de la región metropolitana de Porto Alegre (Estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil). Los instrumentos utilizados fueron el Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), la Battery of Psychosocial Risk Assessment para evaluar ambigüedad de rol, apoyo social, auto-eficacia, autonomía, conflictos interpersonales, conflictos de rol y sobrecarga y un cuestionario para evaluar variables sociodemográficas y ocupacionales. Los resultados demostraran una prevalencia de TMC de 29.7%. Fue realizado un análisis de regresión logística. Ambigüedad, sobrecarga, bajo nivel de apoyo social y baja percepción de auto-eficacia se asociaron a los TMC. Una mayor atención debe prestarse a las amenazas presentes en el contexto escolar una vez que esa clase de variables se asociaron a los TMC en profesores.

Palabras clave: Trastornos mentales comunes. Profesores de enseñanza primaria. Salud ocupacional.

---

 

Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) are a group of distress states manifesting with anxiety, depressive, and unexplained somatic symptoms (Goldberg & Huxley, 1992). Mental disorders are a major source of disability, accounting for approximately 12% of the global burden of diseases (Vos et al., 2012). A systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Steel et al. (2014), evaluating the period from 1980 to 2013, found that 29.2% (25.9-32.6%) of the respondents were identified as having experienced a common mental disorder at some time during their lifetimes. Common mental disorders are highly prevalent globally, affecting people across all regions of the world.

From a public health perspective, depression and anxiety disorders are the most important among these disorders, due to their prevalence in the general population. Although CMDs are characterized as types of psychic suffering, they are regarded as having a non-psychotic nature and do not constitute a diagnostic category (Goldberg & Huxley, 1992). Even though some investigations reveal that CMDs represent between 20% and 40% of primary care consultations (Bhui, Stansfeld, McKenzie, Karlsen, & Scott Weich, 2001; Goldberg & Huxley, 1992), they are generally not the main reason for seeking medical attention (Risal, 2011).

According to the World Health Organization, one in every four people develops one or more mental disorders at some stage in life (WHO, 2001). Studies conducted among the Western population have pointed out a variation of prevalence from 7% to 26% for CMDs (Lopes, Faerstein, & Chor, 2003). A systematic review of the literature of Brazilian studies developed from 1997 to 2009, held by Santos and Siqueira (2010), identified a variation between 20% and 56%, depending on the population under investigation.

Environmental factors can have direct effects on these processes (Goldberg & Huxley, 1992). In Brazil there is a variety of factors that contribute to the high prevalence of stressful life events and of mental disorders in the population, such as accelerated processes of urbanization and industrialization, unequal access to health care, inadequate living conditions, income inequality, unemployment, high violence, and crime rates (Lopes et al., 2003).

In Brazil, in 2011, according to data from the Ministério da Previdência Social do Brasil - MPS [Ministry of Social Welfare] (2011), mental and behavioral disorders, listed in chapter V of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), were the third cause for the granting of disability pensions due to incapacity to work. These circumstances tend to increase.

Although they do not have an effect on workers' survival rates, they may keep them from their activities (Porto et al., 2006). CMDs have been one of the major causes of long-term absences from work (Stansfeld, North, White, & Marmot, 1995) and have great socioeconomic impact, mainly because of lost workdays (Rai, Skapinakis, Wiles, Lewis, & Araya, 2010), amount of disability benefits (Mykletun et al., 2006), and increase in the demand for health services (Broadhead, Blazer, George, & Tse, 1990; Goldberg & Huxley, 1992). Workers with a previous episode of absence due to a CMD are at greater risk of absence due to recurrent illness with common mental disorders in a period of three years (Koopmans et al., 2011).

A meta-analysis of the literature performed by Stansfeld and Candy (2006) identified consistent evidence that the combination of high demand and low decision-making power and of high effort and low rewards are potential risk factors for common mental disorders. In another review of literature, developed by Sanderson and Andrews (2006), one of the results was that workers exposed to adverse psychosocial environments have increased risk of developing CMDs.

Brazilian studies with teachers of private schools found prevalence proportions of CMDs between 20.1% (Araújo et al., 2003) and 41.5% (Delcor et al., 2004). In public education the prevalence was 50.3% (Gasparini, Barreto, & Assunção, 2006). In Germany, a study with teachers identified that 29.8% of the sample had significant mental health problems (Bauer et al., 2007).

In teaching, the consequences of new requirements in the process of school and teaching work are the intensification of work in at least two aspects: intensification due to the expansion of professional demands in teachers' lives, driven from an administrative and bureaucratic perspective, and self-intensification due to the exploitation of the teachers' sense of professionalism and their self-images based on the care and attention that historically characterize childhood education (García & Anadon, 2009). The anachronism present on the public educational system, which combines students of the 21^st century, schools with structures of the 19^th century, and teachers who graduated in the 20^th century, have been producing direct effects in the implementation of activities, which affect the professionals' health (Leão, Oliveira, & Aparecida, 2012).

A study developed by Juncá, Cordeiro, Moraes, Pessanha, and Oliveira (2010), which aimed at developing a profile of the teachers and of the activities in which they were involved, analyzing the relation between their occupation and health conditions, identified that 76.4% of the interviewees thought that the practice of teaching could compromise the professionals' health. Their main complaints regarding health were headaches and migraines, depression, stress, nervousness, irritability and mood swings, insomnia, discouragement and lack of motivation to work, mental fatigue, forgetfulness, and difficulty to concentrate.

The health of the workforce is inextricably linked to its productivity and to the health of the nation's economy. It also shows that employers increasingly recognize this link and are interested in improving workers' health by expanding workforce health protection and health promotion programs (Hymel et al., 2011). Therefore, employers, government bodies, and policy makers are interested in reducing the incidence and prevalence of mental health problems at work.

Thus, numerous studies were conducted with the intention of identifying work factors that increase employees' risk of developing mental health problems (Hilton & Whiteford, 2010). And, in this perspective, the present study, which has an observational epidemiological cross-sectional delineation, aims at identifying the prevalence of CMDs in teachers and at verifying the existence of associations between sociodemographic, occupational and psychosocial variables.

 

Method

Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted with a calculated random sample of the population of 1,250 teachers distributed in all 37 elementary schools located in a large city in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre (in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). The parameters for sample size calculation were the 50.3% prevalence (Gasparini et al., 2006), 5% error, 80% effect power, and 20% potential losses. The final sample consisted of 713 teachers. The collected sample consisted of 679 teachers, with a loss of 34 participants.

Most participants were women (91.8%), with a partner (60.8%) and children (68.6%). Their average age was 42 years (SD = 9) and their salaries were higher than three minimum wages, a reference in Brazil (51.2%). Most participants have a post-graduate degree (61.8%). The majority of the professionals work exclusively at the school under investigation (74.2%). Participants have an average of 17 years of professional experience (range = 1-47, SD = 8.9, Mode = 15) and 8.8 years of professional experience at the school (SD = 7.2). The workload varies between 16 and 57 hours a week, with an average of 34 hours a week (SD = 11.6, Mode = 40). The amount of students they work with per day ranges between 7 and 500, with an average of 77 students per day (SD = 74, Mode = 60).

Instruments

Data were collected using a questionnaire that was specifically designed to investigate some sociodemographic factors (gender, age, marital status, children) and working variables (education, weekly workload at the institution, wages, time working at the institution, work in other activities, jobs at other schools). Additionally, the following self-report instruments were used:

Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). This scale has been designed to assess the presence of common mental disorders. It has been validated for use in Brazil by Mari and Williams (1986). It comprises 20 yes/no questions about physical and psychological symptoms, for the detection of minor psychiatric disorders (anxiety, depression, psychosomatic reactions, irritability, and mental fatigue). Each affirmative answer corresponds to a score of 1 in the final score (sum of all scores). The scores obtained indicate the probability of the presence of non-psychotic disorders, and may range from 0 (in probability) to 20 (extreme probability). The instrument has a Cronbach's alpha of .86 and a cutoff point of 7/8, regardless of gender (Gonçalves, Stein, & Kapczinski, 2008). In the current sample the Cronbach's alpha was .88.

Battery of Psychosocial Risk Assessment (Unidad de Investigación Psicosocial de la Conducta Organizacional- UNIPSICO), by Gil-Monte (2005), evaluating: Role Ambiguity (5 items, α = .78), Social Support (5 items, α = .75), Self-efficacy (8 items, α = .79), Autonomy (5 items, α = .76), Role Conflict (5 items, α = .76), and Overload (6 items, α = .79). All items are assessed on a five-point Likert scale of frequency, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (every day). The Cronbach's alpha obtained in the present study was: Role Ambiguity (α = .77), Social Support (α = .84), Self-efficacy (α = .89), Autonomy (α = .76), Role Conflict (α = .76), and Overload (α = .71).

Procedures

First, we contacted the City's Educational Department and presented the object of the study in order to obtain authorization and support to implement the instruments. Teachers answered the instruments at their workplace. The instruments were collected after they were filled out. The application occurred from September to November 2013. The first author of this study collected the data. Research ethics committees of the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil (PUCRS) approved the study.

The statistical software PASW, version 17 (SPSS/PASW, Inc., Chicago, IL), was applied to conduct the data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate frequencies, mean scores, and standard deviations. The data analysis began with bivariate analyses between the outcome and the study factors. The multivariate logistic regression included the variables that originally presented p-values < .20. The logistic regression was performed according to a three-stage hierarchical model. The demographic variables were introduced in the first stage, and only those with p < .10 were kept in the model. The working variables were introduced in the second stage, using the same criterion to keep them in the regression. The third stage included psychosocial variables. Significant associations were defined as those with p-values < .05 in the stage in which they were introduced in the model.

 

Results

Table 1 shows the results of the descriptive analyses according to categories of symptoms for items of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20). The most prevalent symptoms were feeling nervous, tense or worried, followed by having frequent headaches and sleeping badly, and the less prevalent symptoms were thinking about ending life and feeling like a worthless person.

 

Table 1 - Frequency of symptoms into categories according to affirmative answers.

 

Results showed a 34.8% prevalence of CMDs (n = 236). Results regarding the association between CMDs and sociodemographic, occupational and psychosocial variables are found in Tables 2-4.

 

Table 2 - Sociodemographic characteristics of teachers with
CMDs (n = 236) and without CMDs (n = 443), RS/Brazil, 2013.

 

Table 3 - Work characteristics of teachers with CMDs
(n = 236) and without CMDs (n = 443), RS/Brazil, 2013.

 

Table 4 - Psychosocial characteristics of teachers with CMDs
(n = 236) and without CMDs (n = 443), RS/Brazil, 2013.

 

Table 2 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of teachers with and without CMDs. No significant differences were found in terms of gender, marital status, children, wages, and academic training. There was a predominance of women with regular partners and with children. In most cases, income ranged between three and six minimum wages, followed by three minimum wages or less. Concerning academic education, most interviewees had postgraduate degrees. In relation to age, teachers with CMDs are younger (p < .05).

Regarding occupational characteristics, only the weekly workload and the number of students the teachers work with per day were associated with CMDs (Table 3).

In terms of psychosocial characteristics, all six studied variables were associated with CMDs (Table 4).

In the model of hierarchical logistic regression, the variables that presented a p < .10 level of significance in the stage in which they were introduced remained in the regression, so as to control possible confounding factors. The final model (Table 5) showed that only psychosocial variables presented a significant association with CMDs (p < .05).

 

Table 5 - Hierarchical model of sociodemographic, occupational and
psychosocial variables associated with CMDs (n = 679), RS/Brazil, 2013.

 

Teachers who perceive ambiguity in their role at work had 95% more chances to develop CMDs. Similarly, those who perceive excessive workload had twice as much chance to develop CMDs. Those who think they have little social support at work and think they have low self-efficacy in the occupational context, in turn, present 74% and 96% more chances of CMDs than their peers, respectively.

 

Discussion

Prevalence of CMDs

The findings of this study showed that out of the Brazilian teachers of the sample 236 (34.8%) met with criteria for CMDs. This prevalence rate is within the 7%-26% range for the prevalence reported in different studies with Western populations (WHO, 2003). When compared to the same functional category, namely, teachers, the percentage identified in this study is lower than that in a study conducted by Gasparini et al. (2006), which found a 50.3% prevalence.

Factors associated with CMDs

Findings from the block models show that demographic factors and working variables were not associated with CMDs. Psychosocial variables, such as role ambiguity, overload, low level of social support and low perceived self-efficacy were significantly associated with the increase in the odds ratio for CMDs. All these factors had a moderate impact by increasing the odds twofold, except for social support. Those with low levels of social support had 1.74 times higher odds ratio for CMDs compared to those with high levels.

Psychosocial risks have been associated with numerous mental and physical health problems. Common mental disorders are among them (Leka & Jain, 2010). Work-related stress, depression, and anxiety can be directly associated with the exposure to psychosocial hazards at work (Cox, Griffiths, & Leka, 2005). Studies on workers' health have shown similar results regarding psychosocial stressors, such as role ambiguity (Jamal, 1990; Sobrinho, Carvalho, Bonfim, Cirino, & Ferreira, 2006), overload (Sobrinho et al., 2006), low level of social support (Lakey & Orehek, 2011; Stansfeld, Clark, Caldwell, Rodgers, & Power, 2008), and low perceived self-efficacy (Luszczynska, Gutiérrez-Dońa, & Schwarzer, 2005).

Role ambiguity and overload have been identified as important causes of work-related stress (Vanishree, 2014). Ambiguity arises in those situations when expectations in relation to the role the individual will play are not clear (Jones, 1993). Overload happens when there is too much work to be developed in a short period of time and the individual has scarce resources to do it. According to Maslach and Leiter (1997), this is one of the most notable indications of imbalance between people and their work.

Social support involves empathy, identification, cooperation, and harmonious interaction with others (Crandall, 1984). Thus, dividing individual difficulties with coworkers and supervisors, within an environment of respect and emotional comfort, helps professionals to distance themselves from problems directly related to their target audience, that is, their students. Self-efficacy, in the perspective of the social cognitive theory, is defined as the set of beliefs that people have about their ability to organize their cognitive, affective, and motivational resources, in order to implement the required actions to achieve certain goals, perform certain tasks, or manage specific situations (Bandura, 1997).

In a study with teachers, conducted by Brouwers, Tomic, and Boluijt (2011), support from coworkers had a moderating effect in the relation between work requirements and professional fulfillment, while support from leaders had a moderating effect in self-efficacy belief, work requirements, and professional fulfillment. In this regard, the impact of the lack of social support and low self-efficacy represents significant risk factors for the health conditions of teaching professionals. A successful adaptation to stressful demands contributes to better levels of health (Brouwers et al., 2011; Schwerdtfeger, Konermann, & Schönhofen, 2008).

It is important to highlight that out of the three blocks of variables being studied only the psychosocial variables presented risk factors for CMDs. One might think that in the context of illness at work, psychosocial variables represent the dynamics of the organization of the teaching work. These results revealed a risk profile formed by psychosocial variables, demonstrating the importance of environmental/contextual factors for the development of CMDs, as Goldberg and Huxley (1992) state. Therefore, the study suggests the need to deepen the relation of CMDs according to the social conditions in which the work is performed. Identifying the profile of illness in populations is important to plan and develop public policies (Borrell & Artazcoz, 2008).

One of the strengths of the present study is that data about teachers was extracted from a probabilistic sample. In what concerns the size of the sample, this was sufficient to provide power to the significant effect size in statistical analysis (Cohen, 1988). Additionally, this study used reliable and valid instruments to collect data.

The results of this study should be considered in light of some limitations, such as the cross-sectional design. Another limitation of the study is the utilization of self-reported measures, which may increase the possibility of response bias.

Overall, this study contributes to the development of theoretical knowledge in the area of CMDs among teachers, since this professional category has been poorly investigated concerning this type of harm. Furthermore, the findings have important implications for occupational psychology, applied practitioners, and principals and school administrators.

Psychosocial risks are present in all occupational contexts, representing a constant threat to workers' health. In the school context these threats have increased considerably in recent decades (Carlotto, 2012). Acknowledging this is essential to develop actions to prevent occupational diseases (Leka & Jain, 2010).

Thereby, the results should be used to shed light on possible applied interventions among teachers, such as increasing self-efficacy and social support, resizing activities aimed at reducing the workload, and defining professional assignments in order to reduce role ambiguity.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors of this article declare no conflict of interest.

 

References

1. Araújo, T. M, Silvany Neto, A.M., Reis, E. J. F. B., Dutra, F. R. D., Azi, G.R., & Alves, R. L. (2003). Trabalho docente e sofrimento psíquico: Um estudo entre professores de escolas particulares de Salvador (Teaching and psychological distress: a study among teachers from private schools of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil). Revista da FAEE-BA, 12, 485-495.         [ Links ]

2. Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman, (1997).         [ Links ]

3. Bauer J., Unterbrink T., Hack A., Pfeifer R., Buhl-Grießhaber V., Müller U., Wirsching M. (2007). Working conditions, adverse events and mental health problems in a sample of 949 German teachers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2007;80:442-9.         [ Links ]

4. Bhui K., Stansfeld S., McKenzie K., Karlsen S.Nazroo, Scott J.S. (2001). Racial/ethnic discrimination and common mental disorders among workers: findings from the empiric study of ethnic minority groups in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;95:496-501.         [ Links ]

5. Borrell C., Artazcoz L. (2008). Las desigualdades de género en salud: Retos para el futuro. Revista Espanhola de Salud Pública. 2008;82:245-9.         [ Links ]

6. Broadhead W.E., Blazer D.G., George L.K., Tse C.K. (1990). Depression, disability and days lost from work. JAMA. 1990;264:2524-8.         [ Links ]

7. Brouwers A., Tomic W., Bolujit H. (2011). Job demands, job control, social support, and self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of burnout among physical education teachers. Europe's Journal of Psychology. 2011;7:17-39.         [ Links ]

8. Carlotto M.S. (2012). Síndrome de Burnout em professores: Avaliação, fatores associados e intervenção (Burnout in teachers: Assessment, associated factors and intervention). Porto, Portugal: LivPsic, (2012).         [ Links ]

9. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, (1988).         [ Links ]

10. Cox T., Griffiths A., Leka S. (2005). Work organization and work-related stress. Occupational Hygiene, 3rd ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.         [ Links ]

11. Crandall J.E. (1984). Social interest as a moderator of life stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984;47:164-74.         [ Links ]

12. Delcor N.S., Araújo T.M., Reis E.J.F.B., Porto L., Carvalho F.M., Silva M.O., Andrade J.M. (2004). Condições de trabalho e saúde dos professores da rede particular de ensino de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil (Labor and health conditions of private school teachers in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2004;20:187-203.         [ Links ]

13. García M.M.A., Anadon S.B. (2009). Reforma Educacional, intensificação e autointensificação do trabalho docente (Educational reform, intensification of teacher's work and self-exploitation). Educacaço & Sociedade. 2009;30(106):63-85.         [ Links ]

14. Gasparini S.M., Barreto S.M., Assunção A.A. (2006). Prevalência de transtornos mentais comuns em professores da rede municipal de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil (Prevalence of common mental disorders among schoolteachers in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Cadernos de Saúde Publica. 2006;22:2679-91.         [ Links ]

15. Gil-Monte P.R. (2005). El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo ("burnout"). Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar (Burnout: An occupational illness in the wellbeing society). Madrid: Pirámide, (2005).         [ Links ]

16. Goldberg D., Huxley P. (1992). Common mental disorders: A bio-social model. London: Tavistock, (1992).         [ Links ]

17. Gonçalves, D. M., Stein, A. T., & Kapczinski, F. (2008). Avaliação de desempenho do Self-Reporting Questionnaire como instrumento de rastreamento psiquiátrico: Um estudo comparativo com o Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (Performance of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire as a psychiatric screening questionnaire: A comparative study with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR). Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 24, 380-390.         [ Links ]

18. Hilton M.F., Whiteford H.A. (2010). Interacting with the public as a risk factor for employee psychological distress. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(435).         [ Links ]

19. Hymel P.A., Loeppke R.R., Baase C.M., Burton W.N., Hartenbaum N.P., Hudson T.W., Larson P.W. (2011). Workplace health protection and promotion. A new pathway for a healthier-and safer-workforce. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2011;53:695-702.         [ Links ]

20. Jamal M. (1990). Relationship of job stress and type-a behavior to employees' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychosomatic health problems, and turnover motivation. Human Relations. 1990;43:727-38.         [ Links ]

21. Jones M.L. (1993). Role conflict: Cause of burnout or energizer?. Social Work. 1993;38:136-41.         [ Links ]

22. Juncá D.C. de M, Cordeiro A.P.P., Moraes E.C.G., da J.H., Oliveira M.A.C. de (2010). Voz que cala, corpo que fala: Uma discussão sobre trabalho e saúde de professores de escolas municipais. Servicço Social & Realidade. 2010;19(1):69-90.         [ Links ]

23. Koopmans P.C., Bultmann U., Roelen C.A., Hoedeman R., van J.J.L., Groothoff J.W. (2011). Recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2011;84:193-201.         [ Links ]

24. Lakey B., Orehek E. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review. 2011;118:482-95.         [ Links ]

25. Leão R.F. de, Oliveira D.A. de, Aparecida N. (2012). A saúde do profissional e as condições de trabalho (The health professional and working conditions). Revista Retratos da Escola. 2012;6:301-13.         [ Links ]

26. Leka S., Jain A. (2010). Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: An overview. Geneva: World Health Organization, (2010).         [ Links ]

27. Lopes C.S., Faerstein E., Chor D. (2003). Eventos de vida produtores de estresse e transtornos mentais comuns: Resultados do Estudo Pró-Saúde (Stressful life events and common mental disorders: Results of the Pro-Saude Study). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2003;19:1713-20.         [ Links ]

28. Luszczynska A., Gutiérrez-Dońa B., Schwarzer R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology. 2005;40:80-9.         [ Links ]

29. Mari J.J., Williams P. (1986). Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1986;39:371-7.         [ Links ]

30. Maslach C., Leiter M.P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organization cause, personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1997).         [ Links ]

31. Ministério da Previdência Social do Brasil - MPS, 2011. Anuário Estatístico da Previdência Social. Brasília: DIIE/DATAPREV, (2011).         [ Links ]

32. Mykletun A., Overland S., Dahl A.A., Krokstad S., Bjerkeset O., Glozier N., Prince M. (2006). A population-based cohort study of the effect of common mental disorders on disability pension awards. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;163:1412-8.         [ Links ]

33. Porto L.A., Carvalho F.M., Oliveira N.F.de, Silvany A.M., Araújo T.M. de, Reis E.J., Serre N. (2006). Associação entre distúrbios psíquicos e aspectos psicossociais do trabalho de professores (Association between mental disorders and work-related psychosocial factors in teachers). Revista de Saúde Pública. 2006;40:818-26.         [ Links ]

34. Rai D., Skapinakis P., Wiles N., Lewis G., Araya R. (2010). Common mental disorders, subthreshold symptoms and disability: Longitudinal study. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;197:411-2.         [ Links ]

35. Risal A. (2011). Common mental disorders. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2011;35:213-7.         [ Links ]

36. Sanderson K., Andrews G. (2006). Common mental disorders in the workforce: Recent findings from descriptive and social epidemiology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;51:63-75.         [ Links ]

37. Santos É.G. dos, Siqueira M.M. de. (2010). Prevalência dos transtornos mentais na população adulta brasileira: Uma revisão sistemática de 1997 a 2009 (Prevalence of mental disorders in the Brazilian adult population: a systematic review from 1997 to 2009). Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria. 2010;59:238-46.         [ Links ]

38. Schwerdtfeger A., Konermann L., Schönhofen K. (2008). Self-Efficacy as a health-protective resource in teachers?. A biopsychological approach. Health Psychology. 2008;27:358-68.         [ Links ]

39. Sobrinho C.L.N., Carvalho F.M., Bonfim T.A.S., Cirino C.C.S., Ferreira I.S. (2006). Condições de trabalho e saúde mental dos médicos de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil. (Work conditions and mental health among doctors from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2006;22:131-40.         [ Links ]

40. Stansfeld S., Candy B. (2006). Psychosocial work environment and mental health: A meta-analytic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2006;32:443-62.         [ Links ]

41. Stansfeld S.A., Clark C., Caldwell T., Rodgers B., Power C. (2008). Psychosocial work characteristics and anxiety and depressive disorders in midlife: The effects of prior psychological distress. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008;65:634-42.         [ Links ]

42. Stansfeld S.A., North F.M., White I., Marmot M.G. (1995). Work characteristics and psychiatric disorder in civil servants in London. Journal Epidemiology Community Health. 1995;49:48-53.         [ Links ]

43. Steel Z., Marnane C., Iranpour C., Chey T., Jackson J.W., Patel V., Silove D. (2014). The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-2013. The International Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;         [ Links ].

44. Vanishree P. (2014). Impact of role ambiguity, role conflict and role overload on job stress in small and medium scale industries. Research Journal of Management Sciences. 2014;3(1):10-3.         [ Links ]

45. Vos T., Flaxman A.D., Naghavi M., Lozano R., Michaud C., Ezzati M., Memish Z.A. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163-96.         [ Links ]

46. World Health Organization, 2001. ATLAS: Mental health resources in the world 2001. Geneva: WHO, (2001).         [ Links ]

47. World Health Organization, 2003. Investing in mental health. Geneva: WHO, (2003).         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Mary Sandra Carlotto
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia.
Av. Ipiranga, 6681 - Prédio 11 - Sala 933.
Porto Alegre/RS - Brasil - CEP: 90619-900.
mscarlotto@pesquisador.cnpq.br
mscarlotto@gmail.com

Received 14 April 2014
Accepted 13 April 2015