SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue6Is there an association between sperm normal morphology and their kinetic displacement?Primary vesicoureteral reflux and extravesical ureteral reimplantation in chidren author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Actas Urológicas Españolas

Print version ISSN 0210-4806

Abstract

MARTINEZ JABALOYAS, J.M.; QUEIPO ZARAGOZA, A.; GIL SALOM, M.  and  CHUAN NUEZ, P.. Evaluation of an immunoassay kit to measure free testosterone. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2006, vol.30, n.6, pp.598-601. ISSN 0210-4806.

Introduction and objetives: The best indicators to the diagnosis of hypogonadism are free and bioavailable testosterone circulating levels. Free and bioavailable testosterone measurements are complex. However, simple kits for direct measurement of free testosterone by analog immunoassay are available. We examined the utility of an enzymoimmunoassay kit for free testosterone measurement. Material and method: One hundred thirty-three healthy males were included. Total testosterone, SHBG, albumin and free testosterone was measured. We used two different methods to free testosterone estimation: direct measurement by enzymoimmunoassay and mathematical calculation with Vermeulen's formula, which uses albumin concentration, total testosterone and SHBG to calculate free testosterone (method recommended by the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male). We compared the two methods means values and a linear regression study was performed. Results: Mean age was 37 ± 11 years. Mean serum concentration for total testosterone was 21.43 ± 6.8 nm ol/L. The mean value for free testosterone measured by direct and mathematical method was 0.0508 ± 0.0118 nmol/L and 0.474±0.123 nmol/L respectively. In linear regression study exists a positive correlation between both methods (p< 0.05), although correlation coefficient is very low (r = 0.25). Conclusions: There are significant statistical differences between the measurements of free testosterone by direct and mathematical methods. Although certain correlation is observed, this is very low. In conclusion, free testosterone measurement by enzymoimmunoassay is not reliable.

Keywords : Andropause; Androgens; Testosterone; Immunoassay.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License