SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue6Eating behavior and its association with nutritional status and physical activity in a general Chilean populationAnthropometry and performance of top youth international male basketball players in Spanish national academy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Nutrición Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 1699-5198Print version ISSN 0212-1611

Abstract

SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Eduardo; LOPEZ-ALIAGA, Inmaculada  and  MUNOZ ALFEREZ, Mª José. Analysis of three methods of nutritional screening in oncologic patients. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2018, vol.35, n.6, pp.1324-1330.  Epub Feb 03, 2020. ISSN 1699-5198.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.1878.

Background:

malnutrition is one of the complications that appears most frequently in oncological patients and causes serious consequences such as loss of lean mass.

Objective:

to know which nutritional screening method is most useful in predicting the loss of lean mass in cancer patients.

Methods:

a descriptive study was carried out evaluating three methods of nutritional screening, Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening (MUST) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), in oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. Each method was analyzed by ROC curves with AUC calculation.

Results:

loss of lean mass is present in 48.73% of the patients. Of them, 29.44% present a loss of lean mass between 0-2%; 10.66% of patients, between 2-5%; and 8.13% of patients present a loss of lean mass > 5%. The results show that when taking a loss of lean mass > 5% as a cut-off point, the MST method has a higher AUC than the one presented by the MUST and the NRS-2002 (0.596, CI: 0.444-0.747), with significant statistics (p = 0.041). In addition, it presents high sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value.

Conclusions:

MST is a more valid nutritional screening method than MUST and NRS-2002 to predict the loss of lean mass > 5% in oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment. Its routine use is recommended in patients under radiotherapy treatment.

Keywords : Lean mass loss; Nutritional assessment; Oncology; Malnutrition.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )