SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue6Simple bone cyst of spontaneous resolution: case report and literature reviewFlorid bone dysplasia: imaging signs reported in dental articles published between 2012 and 2021 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Avances en Odontoestomatología

On-line version ISSN 2340-3152Print version ISSN 0213-1285

Abstract

MACIAS HERNANDEZ, M; HIDALGO RIVAS, A  and  CELIS CONTRERAS, C. Epidemology and imaging of osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma in the craniofacial territory. Narrative review. Av Odontoestomatol [online]. 2023, vol.39, n.6, pp.260-271.  Epub Mar 18, 2024. ISSN 2340-3152.

Introduction:

Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma are malignant lesions which locate most frequently in extremities and less frequently in craniofacial territory. Concrete imaging features in craniofacial territory that identify each pathology have not been reported. The aim of the present narrative review is to analyze the epidemiological and imaging features of the craniofacial osteosarcoma (CFOS) and craniofacial chondrosarcoma (CFCS).

Materials and methods:

We analyzed the information on CFOS and CFCS published between 2011 and 2021, focused on imaging analysis.

Results:

CFOS and CFCS do not show sex preference. Whilst CFOS is usually located in bones of membranous origin and is commonly discovered between the third and fourth decade of life, CFCS is usually located in areas of endochondral origin and commonly appears between the third and sixth decade of life. Three radiological presentation patterns are observed in CFOS: sclerotic, lytic and mixed, unlike the CFCS, where only the lytic pattern has been observed. Both pathologies have infiltrated margins. The imaging study is performed with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy, single-photon computed tomography and positron emission tomography, among others. Local recurrence is more common than metastasis in both pathologies.

Conclusion:

CFOS and CFCS have different clinical and epidemiological features but similar imaging features. Stablishing differences between both pathologies is essential to achieve a correct presumptive diagnosis.

Keywords : craniofacial osteosarcoma; craniofacial chondrosarcoma; computerized tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; nuclear medicine.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )