My SciELO
Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana
On-line version ISSN 1989-2055Print version ISSN 0376-7892
Abstract
RINCON, Linda; CEMBORAIN, Marisela; GIL, Bernardette and BOOKAMAN, Angelique. Intra-operative anatomical description of the submammary fold and its implications in the planning of breast surgery with or without implants. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam. [online]. 2022, vol.48, n.4, pp.395-404. Epub Mar 13, 2023. ISSN 1989-2055. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922022000400006.
Background and objective.
Plastic surgeons continue to search for measures to create perfect breasts and avoid complications and undesirable results in aesthetic breast surgeries. We set out to evaluate and describe the deep relationship of the clinical submammary fold of patients in the thorax, to establish its correct position and effectively recreate or reposition it in aesthetic breast surgery.
Methods.
A descriptive, prospective and longitudinal study was performed. The population consisted of 16 female patients (32 breasts) underwent primary aesthetic breast surgeries, mastopexy with or without implants. In all the breasts, during surgery, and as part of the surgical dissection necessary for the intervention, the internal anatomy of the clinical submammary fold was documented, describing its components (subcutaneous cellular tissue, mammary gland) and its relationship with the chest wall (muscle, ribs and intercostal space).
Results.
The clinical submammary fold was more closely related to the subcutaneous cellular tissue and projected more frequently towards the sixth rib. We found that it was composed of a single tissue in 43.8% (14 breasts), of which 92.84% (13 breasts) were subcutaneous cellular tissue and 7.14% (1 breast) was mammary glandular tissue. In 56.2% (18 breasts) it was the combination of subcutaneous cellular tissue and mammary glandular tissue. Regarding the relationships with deep structures of the clinical submammary fold, it was found in costal arches in 75% (24 breasts), more frequently the sixth costal arch, and in 25% (8 breasts) in intercostal spaces, more frequently in the fifth one.
Conclusions.
Based on our findings, we establish guidelines to locate the clinical or preexisting submammary fold in a more anatomically correct position and thus be able to couple it with the surgical submammary fold (retropectoral) in primary and secondary breast surgeries.
Keywords : Submammary fold; Anatomy; Breast reduction; Mastopexy; Breast augmentation; Breast implants.