SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue4Norton scale modified by INSALUD and its differences in clinical practicePressure ulcer in heel, in fragile patient multiresistant to antibiotics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Gerokomos

Print version ISSN 1134-928X

Abstract

ROA DIAZ, Zayne Milena; PARRA, Dora Inés  and  CAMARGO-FIGUERA, Fabio Alberto. Validity and Quality indices of Braden and Norton scales. Gerokomos [online]. 2017, vol.28, n.4, pp.200-204. ISSN 1134-928X.

Aim:

To determine the construct and criterion validity, quality indices of sensitivity, specificity and efficiency of the Braden and Norton Scales in adult patients hospitalized.

Methods:

Validation of diagnostic technologies nested in a prospective cohort. Inclusion criteria: be 18 years old or older and do not have pressure ulcer at admission. Criterion validity was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, quality indices and AUC, relative risk.

Results:

938 people tested, 5.1% (95% CI 3.6 - 6.4) had at least one pressure ulcer. It was calculated for the cutoffs ≤18 Braden and ≤17 Norton sensitivities of 89.8 and 83.7% and quality indices of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively; quality indices of specificity showed values below 0.20.

Conclusion:

The Braden scale presented a better balance in its psychometric properties for individual risk assessment of developing UPP; however, the quality indices for the specificity of both scales reveal poor performance.

Keywords : risk assessment scales; Braden Scale; Norton Scale; pressure ulcers; validity.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )