SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue1Experiences and changes in parents of children with infant cerebral palsy: a qualitative studyDevelopment and validation of a scale on sense of suffering: The «Humanizar» Scale author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

Print version ISSN 1137-6627

Abstract

ESCUDERO-CARRETERO, M.J. et al. Elaboration and validation of an informative document on adenoamigdalectomy for patients. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2013, vol.36, n.1, pp.21-33. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000100003.

Background. Access to up-to-date and understandable health information is a growing citizen demand, as well as an ethical duty and a legal regulation. Written information reinforces information transmitted orally during the consultation and improves recall capacity. Adenoamigdalectomy is an intervention that affects a high number of patients, the majority from the child population that has a high emotional sensitivity, and it is experienced by parents with considerable anxiety. An informative guide on adenoamigdalectomy was elaborated and validated. The aim of this article is to describe the process of elaborating the document, emphasizing its validation and results. Material and methods. The document was validated in three phases: A) Clinical content validated by professionals with a checklist and a consensus meeting; B) Analysis of grammatical legibility according to the Flesch index; C) Validation of lexical legibility with citizens by means of a validation guide and interviews. Results. The validation by professionals and citizens was highly positive. The professionals stressed the accuracy of the content and corrected some imprecisions. They made suggestions concerning format, writing style and length. The citizens stressed understandable language, resolution of doubts, respectful tone and their satisfaction with the initiative. They also differed on aspects such as their opinion of the document's length. Conclusions. The validation of informative documents by both professionals and patients is a process of great interest. Lack of agreement in their analyses makes it clear why it is important to include both sectors. The document was improved by their contributions.

Keywords : Information; Health communication; Health education; Informative pamphlet for patients.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License