SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 issue62Mindfulness in Pediatrics: the "Growing with mindfulness" project author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Pediatría Atención Primaria

Print version ISSN 1139-7632

Abstract

MOLINA ARIAS, M.. Cheating with statistics. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [online]. 2014, vol.16, n.62, pp.181-186. ISSN 1139-7632.  https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1139-76322014000300012.

Huge quantities of medical papers are published every day in biomedical journals, but unfortunately, a high proportion of them have methodological errors that may question the validity of their results. These errors are usually due to the lack of knowledge about methodology by the authors, who are primarily clinical physicians, and the lack of adequately trained reviewers in scientific journals. Also, sometimes mistakes can be made deliberately to favor obtaining certain conclusions, as in the cases with conflict of interest. In this article we review the most common mistakes that can be observed in the use of statistical tests, either for lack of training of the authors, or to mask the data to show the desired conclusions.

Keywords : Conflict of interest; Statistics; Methodology.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License