SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue1Relationship between the level of critical nutrients and "light" nutritional claims in processed and ultra-processed products offered in a supermarket chain in Lima, Peru: an analytical cross-sectional studyFood additives added to packaged or canned foods in Mexico, reliable information? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética

On-line version ISSN 2174-5145Print version ISSN 2173-1292

Abstract

TENORIO, Danielle Mitchell; RODRIGUES, Isa Galvão; MONTEIRO JUNIOR, José Gildo de Moura  and  PINHO, Cláudia Porto Sabino. Phase angle for nutritional risk screening in cardiac critically ill patients. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet [online]. 2023, vol.27, n.1, pp.43-50.  Epub Mar 04, 2024. ISSN 2174-5145.  https://dx.doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.1.1760.

Introduction:

The phase angle has been listed as a nutritional marker and its useful role in critically ill patients, but its role as a patient-to-patient tool has not yet been tested. This study sought to evaluate the phase angle as a proposal to determine nutritional risk in critically ill patients hospitalized in cardiac intensive care units.

Methodology:

Transversal study, coupled to a prospective analysis variable (hospitalization outcome) and involving adult and elderly male and female patients in cardiac intensive care units. The nutritional risk was determined by using the NUTRICscore, the phase angle was obtained through bioelectrical impedance analysis and other data, through the clinical record. A significance level of p<0.05 was used for all statistical analysis.

Results:

79 patients were included and resulted in homogeneous distribution among the sexes and an average age of 67.2±13.7 years. Most of the sample had malnutrition according to the body mass index (BMI) (46.7%; CI: 36.0-57.8) and due to the adequacy of the arm circumference (40.8%; CI: 34.0-52.0). According to the NUTRIC score, 59.5% (CI: 48.5-69.3) had a high nutritional risk, and 68.4% (CI: 57.4-77.6) had a low phase angle (≤5.5 °). Correlation between the phase angle and age (p=0.010) and BMI (p=0.023) was verified. A good sensitivity (72%; CI: 55.6-81.9) and specificity (68%; CI: 42.5-77.5) of the low phase angle were obtained to detect nutritional risk by NUTRIC.

Conclusions:

The phase angle had good results of sensitivity and specificity but should be used with caution to determine the nutritional risk in critically ill cardiac patients..

Keywords : Nutritional Screening; Risk Factors; Bioelectrical Impedance; Critical Care; Intensive Care Units; Mortality.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )