SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 issue1High rate of uncovered struts in latest generation drug-eluting stents with durable, biodegradable polymer or lack of it 1 month after implantationCost-effectiveness of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low surgical mortality risk patients in Spain author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


REC: Interventional Cardiology

On-line version ISSN 2604-7276Print version ISSN 2604-7306

Abstract

NUCHE, Jorge et al. Ischemic postconditioning fails to reduce infarct size in pig models of intermediate and prolonged ischemia. REC Interv Cardiol ES [online]. 2023, vol.5, n.1, pp.29-37.  Epub Mar 18, 2024. ISSN 2604-7276.  https://dx.doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000330.

Introduction and objectives:

Ischemic postconditioning (iPost, coronary intermittent re-occlusion maneuvers immediately after PCI mediated reperfusion) has been proposed to limit infarct size (IS). However, a few experimental and clinical contradictory results have been reported. We hypothesized that iPost cardioprotection is affected by the duration of ischemia. Our objective was to assess IS in the presence/absence of iPost in a pig model of myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration.

Methods:

Large white pigs (n = 38) underwent angioplasty balloon-induced coronary ischemia followed by reperfusion. Two set of experiments were carried out: intermediate (30 min) and prolonged (40 min) ischemia. In both, pigs were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to receive iPost (4 cycles of “1 min balloon inflation followed by 1 min deflation” upon reperfusion) or control. Animals underwent contrast-enhanced multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance scan on day 7. Primary outcome measure was cardiac magnetic resonance based IS (% of left ventricular mass). The interaction between treatment allocation and ischemia duration was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA test.

Results:

iPost was not associated with smaller IS in any of the ischemia duration protocols (intermediate ischemia: 0.3% [0.0 – 3.9] vs 0.9% [0.0 – 2.6] in iPost and control, respectively; P = .378; long ischemia: 31.1% [27.3 – 32.8] vs 27.3% [25.1 – 27.5]; P = .248). When both ischemia-duration protocols were combined, iPost was not associated with smaller IS (3.9% [0.0 – 30.9] vs 4.6% [0.2 – 25.1]; P = .672). T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost compared to controls (1306.2 ms [1190.7 – 1492.7] vs 1240.7 ms [1167.1 – 1304.5]; P = .024).

Conclusions:

In a pig model of reperfused myocardial infarction of variable ischemia duration, iPost failed to reduce IS. T1 relaxation times were longer in animals undergoing iPost indicative of the potential harm involved in this procedure.

Keywords : Reperfusion injury; Ischemic postconditioning; Cardioprotection; Myocardial infarction.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )