SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 issue4Thermodilution assessment of vasoreactivity and microvascular function in the absence of obstructive coronary artery diseaseLeft atrial appendage occlusion vs oral anticoagulants in AF and coronary stenting. The DESAFIO registry author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


REC: Interventional Cardiology

On-line version ISSN 2604-7276Print version ISSN 2604-7306

Abstract

JURADO-ROMAN, Alfonso et al. Design of the ROLLERCOASTR trial: rotational atherectomy, lithotripsy or laser for the management of calcified coronary stenosis. REC Interv Cardiol ES [online]. 2023, vol.5, n.4, pp.279-286.  Epub Mar 04, 2024. ISSN 2604-7276.  https://dx.doi.org/10.24875/recic.m23000381.

Introduction and objectives:

Coronary calcification is one of the leading factors that affect negatively the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention. Several calcium modification techniques exist. However, there is a lack of randomized evidence on the therapy of choice in this scenario.

Methods:

The ROLLERCOASTR is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy profile of 3 plaque modification techniques in the moderate-to-severe coronary calcification setting: rotational atherectomy (RA), excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA), and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The study primary endpoint is stent expansion evaluated by optical coherence tomography. An intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted with an alpha coefficient of 0.05 between the reference group (RA) and the remaining 2 groups (ELCA and IVL). An analysis of the study primary endpoint per protocol will be conducted for consistency purposes. If the non-inferiority hypothesis is confirmed, a superiority 2-sided analysis will be conducted. Both the clinical events committee and the independent core laboratory will be blinded to the treatment arm. Assuming an α error of 0.05, an β error of 0.2 (80% power), a margin of irrelevance (ε) of 7, and losses of 10% due to measurement difficulty or impossibility to complete the intervention, we estimate a sample size of 56 cases per group. The study secondary endpoints are device success, procedural success, crossover rate among the different techniques used, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions:

The ROLLERCOASTR trial will evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of 3 plaque modification techniques: RA, ELCA, and IVL in patients with calcified coronary stenosis. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT04181268.

Keywords : Percutaneous coronary intervention; Calcified plaques; Laser; Lithotripsy; Rotational atherectomy; Optical coherence tomography.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )