SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.61 número4Experiencia inicial en el diagnóstico y tratamiento del tumor vesical superficial con Hexvix® índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Archivos Españoles de Urología (Ed. impresa)

versión impresa ISSN 0004-0614

Resumen

DIZ RODRIGUEZ, Ramón et al. Evaluation of the irrigation and drainage capacity of 3 bladder irrigation catheters. Arch. Esp. Urol. [online]. 2008, vol.61, n.4, pp.468-472. ISSN 0004-0614.

Objectives: To perform a comparative evaluation of three types of continuous bladder irrigation catheters with the aim of determining which of them allows greater irrigation solution inflow and bladder outflow. Methods: We compared three types of three-way catheters, 22F in caliber, being the material the main difference between them: latex, silicone, or polyvinyl. Results: The polyvinyl catheter showed significant differences both in inflow and outflow in comparison with the other two types of catheters (p =0,000, ANOVA test with Sheffe’s post hoc). Additionally, the latex catheter showed a significant outflow decrease with the insufflation of the self retentive balloon. Conclusions: The polyvinyl catheter, due to material rigidity, is the one that allows better bladder irrigation.

Palabras clave : Ureteral catheter; Bladder irrigation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons