SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número4Validación de una escala de creencias sobre la adherencia al tratamiento con suplementos de hierro en madres de niños con anemiaUna descripción matemática del ecosistema de terapia nutricional índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 1699-5198versión impresa ISSN 0212-1611

Nutr. Hosp. vol.39 no.4 Madrid jul./ago. 2022  Epub 31-Oct-2022

https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.03944 

Original Papers

Effect of voluntary wheel running on gut microbiota composition in developing mice

Efecto de la rueda voluntaria que gira sobre la composición de la microbiota intestinal en ratones en desarrollo

Changjian Wan, data collection and analysis, manuscript reading and approvement1  2  ; Zhi-Bin Liu, data collection and analysis, manuscript reading and approvement2  ; Haoyuan Tan, data collection and analysis, manuscript reading and approvement3  ; Zhuyu Zhang, data collection and analysis, manuscript reading and approvement2  ; Qiong Zhou, manuscript revision, manuscript reading and approvement2  ; Li-Hua Yao, manuscript revision, manuscript reading and approvement4  ; Wei Meng, experiments conception and design, manuscript reading and approvement1  2  ; Songhua Wang, experiments conception and design, writing, manuscript reading and approvement1  2 

1School of Sport Science. Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. Nanchang, China

2Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Organic Chemistry. Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. Nanchang, China

3Clinical School of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation. Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Guangzhou, China

4School of Life Science. Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. Nanchang, China

Abstract

Background:

exercise can increase the species and quantity of beneficial gut microbiota, enrich the diversity of microflora, and promote the development of symbiotic bacteria, especially in the stage of ontogeny. However, there is little evidence of the short-term voluntary exercise effect on the gut microbiota in developing mice.

Material and method:

therefore, we used short-term voluntary wheel running model to study the gut microbiota of developing mice (1 month old), and detected the fecal samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results:

the results showed that after 4 weeks of voluntary wheel running, the body weight of the running group was significantly lower than that of the control group.

Conclusion:

there was a significant separation between the running group and the control group in beta diversity measures. At the family level, the clostridiales flora of the running group was higher than that of the control group. Compared with the control group, the abundance of parabacteroides flora and anaerovorax flora increased significantly, and the abundance of anaerotruncus flora and odoribacter flora decreased significantly in the running group. These results showed that gut microbiota be affected after short-term voluntary wheel running in developing mice.

Keywords: Gut microbiota; Excise; Voluntary wheel running; Mice

Resumen

Introducción:

el ejercicio puede aumentar las especies y la cantidad de microbiota intestinal beneficiosa, enriquecer la diversidad de la microflora y promover el desarrollo de bacterias simbióticas, especialmente en la etapa de ontogenia. Sin embargo, hay poca evidencia del efecto del ejercicio voluntario a corto plazo sobre la microbiota intestinal en ratones en desarrollo.

Material y método:

por lo tanto, utilizamos un modelo de carrera de ruedas voluntario a corto plazo para estudiar la microbiota intestinal de ratones en desarrollo (1 mes de edad) y detectamos las muestras fecales mediante la secuenciación del gen 16S rRNA.

Resultados:

los resultados mostraron que después de 4 semanas de carrera voluntaria con ruedas, el peso corporal del grupo de carrera fue significativamente más bajo que el del grupo de control.

Conclusión:

hubo una diferencia significativa entre el grupo de corredores y el grupo de control en las medidas de diversidad beta. A nivel familiar, la flora de clostridiales del grupo de corredores fue mayor que la del grupo de control. En comparación con el grupo de control, la abundancia de flora parabacteroides y flora anaerovorax aumentó significativamente, y la abundancia de flora anaerotruncus y flora odoribacter disminuyó significativamente en el grupo de carrera. Estos resultados mostraron que la microbiota intestinal se ve afectada después de la carrera voluntaria a corto plazo en ratones en desarrollo.

Palabras clave: Microbiota intestinal; Extirpar; Marcha voluntaria de la rueda; Ratones

INTRODUCTION

When vertebrates are born, a large number of microbiota parasite to the body through exposing external environment (mouth, vagina, skin, gut, etc.) (1). After a long time of evolution, a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship has been formed between microorganisms and the host, in which gut microbiota are one of the most complex micro ecosystems (2). There are more than 100 trillion bacteria in the distal intestine, which are composed of thousands of microbiota, including two main category, Phyla Bacteroidea (60-65 %), Firmicutes (20-25 %) and some less Phyla Actinomycetes, Verrucous Microflora and Proteus, forming an interactive complex community (3). The main nutritional source of gut microbiota is the indigestible carbohydrate in the diet. Its fermentation produces acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid, called short chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs are secreted into the intestinal cavity and then enter the blood through epithelial cells, so as to reach various organs and play a role as the substrate of energy metabolism (4).

Gut microbiota have the functions of metabolism, immunity and intestinal protection. They are strong metabolic capacity and functional plasticity and this functional plasticity of gut microbiota depend on the development stage at a great extent (5). Studies have found that the microbial function promoted by exercise during the developmental period (6). The significant of microbial development in this period has also been revealed in the study of Germ-free (GF) mice. It was found that the anxiety behavior of developing GF mice in the elevated maze could be weakened by transplanting gut microbiota of normally fed developing mice, but not in adult mice (7). In addition, early administration of antibiotics can lead to an increase in body weight and fat in adulthood (8). The gut microbiota during development period play an important role through the host life and have high plasticity (9). Therefore, the developmental stage may be the key regulation stage of gut microbiota. It is very important to intervene the gut microbiota in the developmental stage, so as to have an effect on the whole organism.

Campbell et al. found that exercise has a unique effect on gut microbiota independent of diet in mice (10). In the study of human, it is found that the populations of Prevotella and Brevibacterium of professional cyclists are significantly higher than those of amateur cyclists, and are closely related to the training frequency (11). In addition, in the study of obese and thin people, it was found that 6 weeks of continuously exercise increased the concentration of SCFAs in thin people, but had no effect on obese people. After the exercise stopped, the changes of gut microbiota were reversible, indicating that this change is related to obesity, independent of diet, but depends on the continuously exercise (12). Evans et al. also confirmed that exercise can prevent obesity and induce changes in the percentage of major bacteria in obese mice fed with high fat (13). It was found that six weeks of voluntary wheel running also significantly increased the butyrate concentration in the cecum of rats, resulting in changing in the composition of gut microbiota (14). Other study found that even four weeks of voluntary wheel running can increase the number of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus, both of which are related to emotion and lean body components (15). A large amount of evidences showed that exercise has a significant impact on gut microbiota in adult, but the evidence of the impact of exercise on gut microbiota in the development stage did not be well studied. Therefore, in order to reveal the effect of short-term exercise on gut microbiota in developing animals, we designed the following experiments with voluntary wheel running exercise. In this study, we used 1-month-old mice with voluntary wheel running exercise. After 4 weeks of voluntary wheel running exercise, 16S rRNA was used to sequence the feces of developing mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SUBJECTS AND HOUSING

Male KM mice (1-month-old) from Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. were selected. With the approval of the animal ethics committee of Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. All mice were weighed weekly, and had ad libitum access to food and water. The feed was dried national rodent feed and fed in a naturally ventilated animal room. The temperature was 24.0 ± 1.0 ºC and the humidity was 40 %-60 %.

VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING

One-month-old male mice born on the same day were selected for the experiment, and the mice were randomly assigned to the control group and the running group at the beginning of the experiment, 15 mice in the control group and 15 mice in the running group, a total of 30 mice, were raised in 6 polyethylene cages (270 mm × 260 mm × 200 mm), each 5 mice, and a total of three batches of experiments were performed to ensure that the mice were not separated from each other at the beginning of the experiment. No significant difference. In order to reduce the impact of running wheels on the environment, running wheels were placed in the cages of two groups of rats, and the runners that could move freely were placed in the running group of rats in one cage, while the control group and runners could not move freely. Normal feeding (16) 4 weeks after sampling and testing.

FECAL SAMPLE COLLECTION

After 4 weeks of normal feeding, a stool sample was collected at 9 am on the first day after the exercise. During sampling, mice were placed in sterile glass cages. After defecation, mice were collected with sterilized tweezers at the first time, and feces were placed in 1.5 ml sterile spiral cap tube (USA scientific, FL), put it into liquid nitrogen for rapid freezing and store it at -80 ºC (16).

16S rRNA GENE SEQUENCING AND MICROBIAL COMPOSITION ANALYSIS

Samples were prepared for sequencing using established protocols (17). The previously stored stool samples were extracted with DNA using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After sample preparation, variable region (V3-V4) of 16S rRNA genes present in each sample was PCR-amplified with forward and reverse primers (F515/R806). The reverse primer is barcoded with an error-correcting 12-base Golay code to facilitate demultiplexing of up to 30 samples (18). Following purification and precipitation to remove PCR artifacts, samples were subjected to multiple sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were picked using a “closed reference´ approach” (19). In brief, this approach takes sequenced reads and compares them to a reference database. A sequence is considered a “hit” if it matches some- thing in the reference database at greater than 97 % sequence identity. If an experimental sequence failed to match any member of the reference collection, it was discarded. Closed-reference picking is preferable to “de-novo” or “open-reference” picking in well characterized mice gut communities because the curated reference database acts as a filter; low quality or noisy sequences which get past the quality control steps, but do not actually represent novel OTUs, are eliminated. GreenGenes May 2013 version was the reference database used (20), and all sequence processing was done with QIIME v 1.8.0 using the UCLUST algorithm. Taxonomy and phylogeny were taken from the GreenGenes reference collection. The sequence was spliced by FLASH (Fast Length Adjustment of Short reads, v1.2.11), and the quality was further controlled by Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME). Rarefaction is a conservative approach that normalizes library size to prevent type I errors in a variety of techniques applied by QIIME. Recent literature has questioned the “statistical admissibility” of rarefaction in the context of differential abundance testing (e.g. ANOVA), but provide a superior method for only the basic two-way comparison. PCoA, supervised learning, and other methods perform poorly without rarefaction when sequencing depth differs between samples. To check that our selected rarefaction depth was not responsible for erroneous conclusions, these data were also rarefied at higher levels to check that patterns were not artifacts of low sequence coverage. The sparse curve and the species distribution bar graph were constructed by QIIME, the alpha diversity measures and beta diversity measures of the two experimental groups were calculated (16).

RESULTS

VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING AFFECTED THE BODY WEIGHT OF MICE

The figure 1A showed that the weight of mice in the control group and the running group presented an upward trend. There was no significant difference in the weight of mice in the running group and the control group at the first three weeks. At the end of the fourth week, the running group weighed less than the control group (p < 0.05).

Figure 1. Comparison of exercise degree and mouse weight. A. There was no significant difference in body weight between the running group and the control group at 3 weeks, but there was a significant difference in body weight at the fourth week. B. The amount of exercise in the running group increased gradually in the first three weeks and decreased gradually from the fourth week. 

EFFECT OF VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING ON OUT STATISTICS OF GUT MICROBIOTA

To determine the composition of gut microbiota, the 16S rRNA sequencing technology were used. A total of 30 fecal samples (15 in the control group and 15 in the running group) were collected. Under 97 % similarity, 638 OUT were obtained and determined as the core microbiota of the running group and the control group. Through the rapid visualization of species composition and abundance, the microbiota was further analyze. At the same time, the number of OUT shared by the two groups of mice is 602, 25 were specific to the control group and 11 were specific to the running group (Fig. 2A). To evaluate the adequacy of sample number and species richness, the species accumulation box diagram was used. The number of samples reaches 30, the observed number curve of species in the figure tends to be flat, indicating that the experimental sample size is sufficient (Fig. 2B). The width and flatness of RANK curve reflected the higher richness and uniformity of species composition in this experimental sample (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. Comparison of abundance of gut microbiota between running group and control group. A. The two groups of mouse samples share the Venn diagram of OTU. B. Species accumulation box diagram shows species richness. C. Rank curves represent species richness and evenness. The curve width indicates that the species composition is more abundant. The flat curve indicates that the species composition is relatively uniform. 

EFFECT OF VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING ON OF GUT MICROBIOTA IN THE PHYLUM AND GENUS LEVEL

The species composition and proportion are intuitively displayed through the species column chart. In the phylum level, Firmicutes (55.80 %), Bacteroidetes (42.63 %) and Proteus (0.69 %) are the main flora of the gut microbiota in the running group. These three dominant flora account for 99.12 % of the total sequence, and unclassified gut flora only accounts for 0.88 %. In the control group, Firmicutes (54.02 %), Bacteroidetes (44.2 %) and Proteus (0.86 %), and unclassified intestinal flora accounted for 0.92 % (Fig. 3A). In the genus level, the most abundant genus in the running group included Clostridium Xlva (19.86 %), Barnesiella (18.05 %), Parabacteroides (5.59 %), Alistipes (5.21 %) and Intestinimonas (1.34 %).The most abundant genus in the control group included Barnesiella (23.02 %) and Clostridium XlVa (18.18 %), Alistipes (4.92 %), Bacteroides (4.15 %) and Intestinimonas (2.26 %). Although the gut microbes in the running group were slightly different from those in the control group among the 10 genus, but the significant difference caused by voluntary exercise was only found in Intestinimonas (p < 0.05).

Figure 3. Comparison of gut microbial composition between running group and control group. A. Microbiota classification at the phylum level of running group and control group. B. Microbiota classification at the genus level of running group and control group (less than 0.5 % is classified to others). 

EFFECTS OF VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING ON GUT MICROBIOTA IN ALPHA DIVERSITY MEASURES

In order to further analyze the differences of microbial community structure between the two groups of mice, we carried out alpha diversity measures analysis, the sparse curve is flat. This indicated that the number of out clusters is reasonable (Fig. 4A). At the same time, through the comparison of various indexes, the Shannon index of gut microbial diversity in the running group is higher than that in the control group, but there is no significant difference (p = 0.14). At the same time, the ace index of the running group was also higher than that of the control group. In terms of gut microbial richness, there are trends in the sob index (p= 0.12), ACE index (p = 0.30), coverage index (p = 0.08) and Chao index (p= 0.74) of the running group were higher than those of the control group, but there was no significant difference between groups (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4. Comparison of gut microbiota between running group and control group in alpha diversity measures. A. The sparse curve is flat, indicating that the number of out clusters is reasonable. B. The comparison of alpha diversity, including species richness index (sob index, ACE index, coverage index, Chao index) and evenness index (Shannon index), all indexes of mice in the running group were higher than those in the control group. 

EFFECTS OF VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING ON GUT MICROBIOTA IN BETA DIVERSITY MEASURES

In order to visualize the similarity and uniqueness of gut microbiota in the running group and the control group, we used OTU principal component analysis based on unweighted UniFrac distance (PCA: PCa1 18.35 % vs. pca2 15.78 %) and weighted distance principal coordinate analysis (PCoA: pcoa1 17.34 % vs. pcoa2 13.33 %). In our study of gut microbiota in beta diversity measures. It showed that the significant separation (p < 0.01) between the gut microbiota of mice in the running group and in the control group (Fig. 5D). The non-metric multidimensional scale (NMDS) showed that there is difference of gut microbiota between running group and control group based on the Bray Curtis distance (Fig. 5C). Each component of circulating PCA is reached to maximize the interval between them. Therefore, in the analysis using PLS-DA, there is a significant difference between the running group and the control group. The two groups tend to aggregate separately from each other, indicating that each group has a unique microbial population (Fig. 5D). UPGMA cluster analysis was conducted according to the unweighted UniFrac distance matrix, and the relative abundance of species at the gate level was integrated. On the left was the result of UPGMA cluster tree and on the right was the species abundance histogram. It was found that the OTU of gut microbiota in the running group was in the same branch and close to each other. The gut microbiota of mice in the control group are in another branch and far away, indicating that there is a difference in the OTU composition of gut microbiota between the running group and the control group (Fig. 5E).

Figure 5. Comparison of gut microbiota between running group and control group in beta diversity measures. A: OTU principal component analysis (PCA: PCa1 18.35 % vs. pca2 15.78 %). B: Partial least squares discriminant analysis. C: Non metric multidimensional scaling. D: Principal coordinate analysis (PCA: PCa1 18.35 % vs. pca2 15.78 %), each point represents a sample, and there is a significant difference between the running group and the control group. E: Do UPGMA cluster analysis according to the unweighted UniFrac distance matrix, integrate the cluster results with the species relative abundance of each sample at the gate level, and show the species composition and differences. 

EFFECTS OF VOLUNTARY WHEEL RUNNING ON FLORA OF GUT MICROBIOTA

In order to further determine whether specific individual bacterial taxa are rich in differences between the running group and the control group, we conducted Lefse analysis, which combines LDA with effect size measurement (Fig. 5A). The following five taxa show the differential distribution of LDA score > 2: parabactoids flora in the running group (p < 0.05) compared with the control group, the clostridiales flora (p < 0.01) and anaerovorax flora (p < 0.01) were more abundant in running group. Anaerotruncus flora (p< 0.05) and odoribacter flora (p < 0.01) were more abundant in the control group (Fig. 6A).

Figure 6. Ratio of LDA effect size of significantly different microbial groups derived from lefse analysis. A. Cladogram illustrates the phylogenetic relationship between the taxonomic groups of intestinal microbiota in the samples of mice in the running group and the control group. B. The absolute value of LDA is 2. The original p value of Kruskal Wallis test is used for discriminant analysis. The greater the score, the greater the difference. 

The differential enrichment of specific bacteria was shown by the branching diagram based on LDA = 2. For pairwise comparison, two genera in the control group and one family and two genera in the running group play an important role. These results suggested that voluntary wheel running may have a significant impact on the shaping of gut microbiota in developing mice (Fig. 6B).

DISCUSSION

Exercise has a significant impact on gut microbiota (21), and may have a unique positive impact on the stage of development. In this study, we used voluntary wheel running for the first time to study the effect of voluntary wheel running on gut microbiota in the development stage of mice, so as to determine the effect of voluntary wheel running on gut microbiota in developing mice. The body weight, the statistics of OUT, the composition of microbiota and a and b diversity were measured. The weight of developing mice was decreased significantly, the gut microbiota b diversity was increased, and some microbial flora at the genus level and family level were changed after 4 weeks of voluntary wheel running compare to control group. These data showed that the development stage has a significant impact on gut microbiota after voluntary wheel running, and may have a series of positive effects.

Voluntary running is not only one of the more effective ways to affect the body in external stimulation, but also avoids the stress effects caused by other forced exercise (22). A recent study showed that there was a high correlation between physical and emotional stress during exercise and the changes of gastrointestinal microbial composition (23). For example, Clark and Mach had shown that exercise induced stress reduces the level of Turicibacter spp in the cecum and increases the level of Ruminococcus gnavus, which have a clear role in intestinal mucus degradation and immune function (24). In addition, exercise induced stress leads to the release of catabolic hormones, inflammatory cytokines and microbial molecules, and can affect the composition of gut microbiota through the brain gut axis (25). Therefore, the experiment selects voluntary exercise as the form of exercise to explore the effect of voluntary exercise on gut microorganisms in developing mice.

At the phylum level, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the main flora. Firmicutes is an important source of butyrate and plays an important role in the metabolism, digestion and absorption of protein and other nutrients (26). It can not only act on energy metabolism and increase islet sensitivity, but also increase the expression of leptin gene. Bacteroides mainly produces acetate and propionate. Propionate had been shown to reduce the expression of fatty acid initial synthase, while acetate can promote the secretion of insulin and auxin releasing peptide (27). In a recent study, it was found that exercise not only prevented weight gain caused by high-fat diet, but also increased the proportion of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (28). The proportion of Firmicutes/ Bacteroidetes has been found to be related to animal models and human obesity status and predict obesity (29). Therefore, Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes is often regarded as a marker of obesity (30). However, the correlation between obesity characterization and proportion cannot be directly proved (31). This result has not been obtained in many studies, and even the opposite result has appeared, that is, the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes decreases with the appearance of obesity characterization (32). In this study, it is found that when the weight measurement of developing mice is completed at the end of the experiment, The weight of mice in the running group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Fig. 1A), but the proportion of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes in the control group was lower than that in the running group (Fig. 3A), which may be due to the large difference in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the same population (31).

At the family level, Lefse analysis showed that the clostridiales flora in the running group was significantly increased compared with the control group, and the decrease of clostridiales flora was related to the physiological imbalance of Crohn's disease, Crohn's disease is a disease of the digestive tract (33). In previous studies, it was found that regular and moderate running can have beneficial effects on gut microbiota, symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease (34). In this experiment, after the effect of voluntary wheel running on developing mice, the abundance of clostridiales flora was improved (Fig. 6A). The results suggested that the effect of voluntary wheel running on developing mice may be caused by the changes of gut microbiota.

At the genus level, Lefse analysis showed that voluntary wheel running led to a significant increase in the abundance of parabacteroides flora and anaerovorax flora, and a significant decrease in the abundance of anaerotruncus flora and odoribacter flora. Parabacteroides flora, as one of the core flora of human body, is abundant in non-obese individuals (35), and some parabacteroides flora can produce propionic acid and succinic acid to prevent various metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance and obesity caused by diet, which is negatively correlated with body weight (36). This relationship was also reflected in our experiment, that is, the weight of mice in the voluntary wheel running group decreased and the parabactoids flora increased. In addition, anaerovorax flora has therapeutic effects on a variety of diseases, such as the significant reduction of anaerovorax flora in patients with depression (37). In this experiment, exercise increased the abundance of parabacteroides flora and anaerovorax flora (Fig. 6A), indicating that voluntary wheel running may enhance physical immunity during development by increasing the abundance of parabacteroides flora and anaerovorax flora. Previous studies supported our experimental results and found that the abundance of anaerotruncus flora increased in obese mice (64) and humans (65). This suggests that anaerotruncus may be a marker of obesity. In this experiment, the anaerotruncus flora of mice in the control group was significantly more than that in the running group (Fig. 6A), and the weight of mice in the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group. In addition, voluntary wheel running may lead to inflammation through the increase of anaerotruncus flora abundance. The abundance of odoribacter flora is also related to a variety of diseases. The study found that the abundance of odoribacter flora in patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was significantly higher than that in healthy people, and the pathogenesis of ADHD was related to the decrease of dopamine secretion in the central nervous system, suggesting that it may be that odoribacter flora caused ADHD by regulating the secretion of dopamine (67). In this experiment, exercise reduces the abundance of odoribacter flora (Fig. 6A), which indicates that voluntary exercise may regulate the secretion of neurotransmitters in developing children, so as to prevent ADHD.

In this study, we found the effects of four weeks voluntary exercise on gut microbiota in developing mice and a series of beneficial effects. Through the changes of some families and genera of gut microbiota in developing mice, we can further understand how voluntary exercise has beneficial effects on gut microbiota in developing mice. It was found that short-term voluntary exercise had a specific effect on gut microbiota in the development stage. This experiment provides a theoretical basis and research basis for the effect of voluntary exercise on gut microbiota to promote health in the development stage, but the mechanism of action between exercise and gut microbiota and the beneficial effects of gut microbiota still need to be further explored.

Acknowledgements:

we thank the BGI-Shenzhen for the analysis of data.

REFERENCES

1. Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease. Nature 2007;449(7164):811-8. DOI:10.1038/nature06245 [ Links ]

2. Hooper LV. Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development. Trends Microbiol 2004;12(3):129-34. DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2004.01.001 [ Links ]

3. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012;486(7402):207-14. DOI:10.1038/nature11234 [ Links ]

4. Samuel BS, Shaito A, Motoike T, Rey FE, Backhed F, Manchester JK, et al. Effects of the gut microbiota on host adiposity are modulated by the short-chain fatty-acid binding G protein-coupled receptor, Gpr41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(43):16767-72. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0808567105 [ Links ]

5. Sonnenburg JL, Xu J, Leip DD, Chen CH, Westover BP, Weatherford J, et al. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science 2005;307(5717):1955-9. DOI:10.1126/science.1109051 [ Links ]

6. Stilling RM, Ryan FJ, Hoban AE, Shanahan F, Clarke G, Claesson MJ, et al. Microbes &neurodevelopment--Absence of microbiota during early life increases activity-related transcriptional pathways in the amygdala. Brain Behav Immun 2015;50:209-20. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.009 [ Links ]

7. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Björkholm B, Samuelsson A, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(7):3047-52. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1010529108 [ Links ]

8. Ajslev TA, Andersen CS, Gamborg M, Sørensen TI, Jess T. Childhood overweight after establishment of the gut microbiota: the role of delivery mode, pre-pregnancy weight and early administration of antibiotics. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35(4):522-9. DOI:10.1038/ijo.2011.27 [ Links ]

9. Wall R, Ross RP, Ryan CA, Hussey S, Murphy B, Fitzgerald GF, et al. Role of gut microbiota in early infant development. Clin Med Pediatr 2009;3:45-54. DOI:10.4137/cmped.s2008 [ Links ]

10. Campbell SC, Wisniewski PJ, Noji M, McGuinness LR, Häggblom MM, Lightfoot SA, et al. The Effect of Diet and Exercise on Intestinal Integrity and Microbial Diversity in Mice. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0150502. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0150502 [ Links ]

11. Petersen LM, Bautista EJ, Nguyen H, Hanson BM, Chen L, Lek SH, et al. Community characteristics of the gut microbiomes of competitive cyclists. Microbiome 2017;5(1):98. DOI:10.1186/s40168-017-0320-4 [ Links ]

12. Allen JM, Mailing LJ, Niemiro GM, Moore R, Cook MD, White BA, et al. Exercise Alters Gut Microbiota Composition and Function in Lean and Obese Humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018;50(4):747-57. DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001495 [ Links ]

13. Clark A, Mach N. Exercise-induced stress behavior, gut-microbiota-brain axis and diet: a systematic review for athletes. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2016;13:43. DOI:10.1186/s12970-016-0155-6 [ Links ]

14. Boutron-Ruault MC, Marteau P, Lavergne-Slove A, Myara A, Gerhardt MF, Franchisseur C, et al.;Eripolyp Study Group. Effects of a 3-mo consumption of short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides on parameters of colorectal carcinogenesis in patients with or without small or large colorectal adenomas. Nutr Cancer 2005;53(2):160-8. DOI:10.1207/s15327914nc5302_5 [ Links ]

15. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Björkholm B, Samuelsson A, et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(7):3047-52. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1010529108 [ Links ]

16. Mika A, Van Treuren W, González A, Herrera JJ, Knight R, Fleshner M. Exercise is More Effective at Altering Gut Microbial Composition and Producing Stable Changes in Lean Mass in Juvenile versus Adult Male F344 Rats. PloS One 2015;10(5):e0125889. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125889 [ Links ]

17. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Costello EK, Berg-Lyons D, González A, Stombaugh J, et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol 2011;12(5):R50. DOI:10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50 [ Links ]

18. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011;108 (Suppl 1):4516-22. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1000080107 [ Links ]

19. Navas-Molina JA, Peralta-Sánchez JM, González A, McMurdie PJ, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Xu Z, et al. Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME. Methods Enzymol 2013;531:371-444. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-407863-5.00019-8 [ Links ]

20. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 2012;6(3):610-8. DOI:10.1038/ismej.2011.139 [ Links ]

21. Allen JM, Berg Miller ME, Pence BD, Whitlock K, Nehra V, Gaskins HR, et al. Voluntary and forced exercise differentially alters the gut microbiome in C57BL/6J mice. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2015;118(8):1059-66. DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.01077.2014 [ Links ]

22. Eadie BD, Redila VA, Christie BR. Voluntary exercise alters the cytoarchitecture of the adult dentate gyrus by increasing cellular proliferation, dendritic complexity, and spine density. J Comp Neurol 2005;486(1):39-47. DOI:10.1002/cne.20493 [ Links ]

23. Goehler LE, Park SM, Opitz N, Lyte M, Gaykema RP. Campylobacter jejuni infection increases anxiety-like behavior in the holeboard: possible anatomical substrates for viscerosensory modulation of exploratory behavior. Brain Behav Immun 2008;22(3):354-66. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2007.08.009 [ Links ]

24. Clark A, Mach N. Exercise-induced stress behavior, gut-microbiota-brain axis and diet: a systematic review for athletes. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2016;13:43. DOI:10.1186/s12970-016-0155-6 [ Links ]

25. Ulrich-Lai YM, Herman JP. Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10(6):397-409. DOI:10.1038/nrn2647 [ Links ]

26. Berry D. The emerging view of Firmicutes as key fibre degraders in the human gut. Environ Microbiol 2016;18(7):2081-3. DOI:10.1111/1462-2920.13225. Epub 2016 Feb 4. Erratum in: Environ Microbiol 2016;18(12):5305. [ Links ]

27. Kong LC, Tap J, Aron-Wisnewsky J, Pelloux V, Basdevant A, Bouillot JL, et al. Gut microbiota after gastric bypass in human obesity: increased richness and associations of bacterial genera with adipose tissue genes. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98(1):16-24. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.113.058743 [ Links ]

28. Evans CC, LePard KJ, Kwak JW, Stancukas MC, Laskowski S, Dougherty J, et al. Exercise prevents weight gain and alters the gut microbiota in a mouse model of high fat diet-induced obesity. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92193. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0092193 [ Links ]

29. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006;444(7122):1027-31. DOI:10.1038/nature05414 [ Links ]

30. De Bandt JP, Waligora-Dupriet AJ, Butel MJ. Intestinal microbiota in inflammation and insulin resistance: relevance to humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2011;14(4):334-40. DOI:10.1097/MCO.0b013e328347924a [ Links ]

31. Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P, et al. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 2020;12(5):1474. DOI:10.3390/nu12051474 [ Links ]

32. Jumpertz R, Le DS, Turnbaugh PJ, Trinidad C, Bogardus C, Gordon JI, et al. Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94(1):58-65. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.110.010132 [ Links ]

33. Joossens M, Huys G, Cnockaert M, De Preter V, Verbeke K, Rutgeerts P, et al. Dysbiosis of the faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn's disease and their unaffected relatives. Gut 2011;60(5):631-7. DOI:10.1136/gut.2010.223263 [ Links ]

34. Diduch BK. Gastrointestinal Conditions in the Female Athlete. Clin Sports Med 2017;36(4):655-69. DOI:10.1016/j.csm.2017.06.001 [ Links ]

35. Kasai C, Sugimoto K, Moritani I, Tanaka J, Oya Y, Inoue H, et al. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between obese and non-obese individuals in a Japanese population, as analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next-generation sequencing. BMC Gastroenterol 2015;15:100. DOI:10.1186/s12876-015-0330-2 [ Links ]

36. Chang CJ, Lin CS, Lu CC, Martel J, Ko YF, Ojcius DM, et al. Ganoderma lucidum reduces obesity in mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota. Nat Commun 2015;6:7489. DOI:10.1038/ncomms8489 [ Links ]

37. Yu M, Jia H, Zhou C, Yang Y, Zhao Y, Yang M, et al. Variations in gut microbiota and fecal metabolic phenotype associated with depression by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and LC/MS-based metabolomics. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2017;138:231-239. DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2017.02.008 [ Links ]

38. Shin NR, Lee JC, Lee HY, Kim MS, Whon TW, Lee MS, et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut 2014;63(5):727-35. DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303839 [ Links ]

39. Xu P, Wang J, Hong F, Wang S, Jin X, Xue T, et al. Melatonin prevents obesity through modulation of gut microbiota in mice. J Pineal Res 2017;62(4). DOI:10.1111/jpi.12399 [ Links ]

40. Leclercq S, Mian FM, Stanisz AM, Bindels LB, Cambier E, Ben-Amram H, et al. Low-dose penicillin in early life induces long-term changes in murine gut microbiota, brain cytokines and behavior. Nat Commun 2017;8:15062. DOI:10.1038/ncomms15062 [ Links ]

Funding:this work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31860605,32160123,31660292, 31960193), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20212BAB205003,20212ACB205002,20202BABL205022), the Key project of Science and Technology Program of Department of Education of Jiangxi Province (GJJ190579) and the Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University (2016QNBJRC005). Jiangxi “Double Thousand Plan” Cultivation Program for Distinguished Talents in Scientific and Technological Innovation (jxsq2019201011).

Availability of data and materials:all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval:all experimental procedures used in this study were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. The care and use of all animals were performed according to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of the Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University.

Wan C, Liu Z, Tan H, Zhang Z, Zhou Q, Yao L, Meng W, Wang S. Effect of voluntary wheel running on gut microbiota composition in developing mice. Nutr Hosp 2022;39(4): 896-904

Received: November 10, 2021; Accepted: April 03, 2022

Correspondence: Songhua Wang and Wei Meng. Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Organic Chemistry. Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University. e-mails: wangsonghua18@126.com; meng7883@163.com

Conflict of interest:

the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors´ contribution:

Changjian Wan, and Zhi-Bin Liu contribute to this work equally. SW and WM conceived and designed the experiments. CW, ZL, HT, ZZ performed the experiments, collected and analyzed the data. SW wrote the article and QZ, LY revised the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License