SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 número2Validación de la herramienta de tamizaje nutricional para el cáncer infantil SCAN. Versión en españolValidez y fiabilidad de la escala de evaluación de riesgos para la alimentación y la nutrición (SCREEN II) en la sociedad turca índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 1699-5198versión impresa ISSN 0212-1611

Resumen

GUEVARA-CRUZ, Martha et al. Validation of the instrument "Infant Malnutrition and Feeding Checklist for Congenital Heart Disease", a tool to identify risk of malnutrition and feeding difficulties in infants with congenital heart disease. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2023, vol.40, n.2, pp.303-311.  Epub 05-Jun-2023. ISSN 1699-5198.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.04388.

Introduction:

currently, various tools have been designed to timely detect the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized children. In those with a diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD), there is only one tool developed in Canada: Infant Malnutrition and Feeding Checklist for Congenital Heart Disease (IMFC:CHD), which was designed in English.

Objective:

to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Spanish adaptation of the IMFC:CHD tool in infants with CHD.

Methods:

cross-sectional validation study carried out in two stages. The first, of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the tool, and the second, of validation of the new translated tool, where evidence of reliability and validity were obtained.

Results:

in the first stage, the tool was translated and adapted to the Spanish language; for the second stage, 24 infants diagnosed with CHD were included. The concurrent criterion validity between the screening tool and the anthropometric evaluation was evaluated, obtaining a substantial agreement (κ = 0.660, 95 % CI: 0.36-0.95) and for the predictive criterion validity, which was compared with the days of hospital stay, moderate agreement was obtained (κ = 0.489, 95 % CI: 0.1-0.8). The reliability of the tool was evaluated through external consistency, measuring the inter-observer agreement, obtaining a substantial agreement (κ = 0.789, 95 % CI: 0.5-0.9), and the reproducibility of the tool showed an almost perfect agreement (κ = 1, CI 95 %: 0.9-1.0).

Conclusions:

the IMFC:CHD tool showed adequate validity and reliability, and could be considered as a useful resource for the identification of severe malnutrition.

Palabras clave : Congenital heart disease; Malnutrition; Nutritional evaluation; Screening; Validation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )