SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número5Asociación de los ingresos económicos con la utilización y la accesibilidad de los servicios sanitarios en España al inicio del siglo XXI índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Gaceta Sanitaria

versión impresa ISSN 0213-9111

Resumen

SAMPIETRO-COLOM, Laura et al. Prioritizing patients on waiting list for cataract surgery: preference differences among citizens. Gac Sanit [online]. 2006, vol.20, n.5, pp.342-351. ISSN 0213-9111.

Objectives: To estimate and compare citizen preferences regarding patient prioritization for cataract surgery. Method: A conjoint analysis was performed. Priority criteria were identified and selected using 4 focus/nominal groups consisting of the general public, patients/relatives, allied health-professionals and specialists from Catalonia (n = 36). Preferences elicitation (score of criteria): representative sample survey of the above mentioned groups (n = 771) and rank-ordered logit model application. Differences were assessed by group analysis and their comparison. Results: The criteria selected and their relative importance were: visual impairment (45%), difficulty in performing activities of daily living (ADL) (15%), limitation of ability to work (14%), being looked after by someone (11%), being a caregiver (8%), and recovery probability (7%). Differences in scores were observed among groups. Visual impairment was scored more highly by the general public and patients/relatives than by other groups (p < 0.001). These two groups also assigned less importance to difficulty in performing ADL (p < 0.001). The probability of recovery was the least scored criterion by most groups. Correlations among the order of hypothetical patient scenarios were high (r > 0.9). However, the final order of patients on the waiting list could differ by up to 27 positions when different group scores were applied. Conclusions: Social and clinical criteria were considered important. The observed differences among citizens regarding how to prioritize patients on the waiting lists indicates the need to take into account the preferences of all groups of citizens.

Palabras clave : Priority setting; Elective surgery; Cataract; Conjoint analysis; Preferences; Social participation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons