SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número1Percepciones de los profesionales sobre la atención prestada, obstáculos y dilemas éticos relacionados con el final de la vida en hospitales, centros de Atención Primaria y residencias de ancianosEvaluación y mejora de la calidad asistencial en fisioterapia a pacientes con cefalea índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra

versión impresa ISSN 1137-6627

Resumen

MIRA, J.J. et al. Level of knowledge of Quality Commitment Campaign and of “do not do” recommendations amongst general practitioners, pediatricians and nursing Primary Care. Anales Sis San Navarra [online]. 2018, vol.41, n.1, pp.47-55. ISSN 1137-6627.  https://dx.doi.org/10.23938/assn.0228.

Background

To evaluate if the Quality Commitment Campaign (QCC) was sufficiently known among primary care professionals (PC), and second, to evaluate the knowledge about certain recommendations of what should not be done in PC.

Methods

A observational study was conducted. General practitioners (GP), pediatricians (PED) and nursing (NUR) participated. A direct question was asked about whether QCC was known and a set of dichotomous questions based on the “do not do” recommendations to assess their knowledge. A sample size of 288 professionals from each group was the minimum required for a sampling error of 5%, 95% confidence level and p=0.75. The field study was conducted with the collaboration of health services and professional and scientific organizations. Data were described by frequencies and mean (standard deviation), and compared by means of χ2/Fisher or ANOVA and t-test.

Results

A total of 1,904 professionals (936 GP, 682 PED and 286 NUR) answered. The QCC initiative was known by 828 (43.5%) professionals: 524 (56.0%) GP, 234 (34.3%) PED and 70 (24.5%) NUR (p<0.001). All the questions were correctly answered by 652 (69.7%) GP, 631 (92.5%) PED and 116 (40.6%) NUR. Significantly more mistakes (p<0.001) were made by those who did not know the QCC, worked in the private sector or were not considered responsible for overuse. Despite not knowing the QCC, 60% GP and 90% PED answered all the questions of the test correctly.

Conclusions

NUR and GP could benefit from a greater diffusion of the QCC. As could those working in the private sector and those who believe that professionals have little responsibility for unnecessary overuse.

Palabras clave : Overuse; Quality assurance; Scientific societies; Primary care; “Do not do” recommendations.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )