SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número6Calidad de la dieta, sobrepeso y obesidad en estudiantes universitariosEfecto de la leptina en el tratamiento de la obesidad e influencia de la dieta en la secreción y acción de la hormona índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versão On-line ISSN 1699-5198versão impressa ISSN 0212-1611

Resumo

VALERO ZANUY, M.ª A. et al. Should hydration and artificial nutrition be accepted as a palliative care?. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2006, vol.21, n.6, pp.680-685. ISSN 1699-5198.

Background: Ethical considerations are becoming more and more common in clinical practice. There is no unanimous agreement on which measures should be deemed as basic care, specially regarding hydration and artificial nutrition. Aim: To know the opinion of lay people and health professionals, stratified according to their university degree, about which palliative measures, including hydration and artificial nutrition, should be judged as palliative care. Methods: A descriptive transversal study has been designed to know the opinion of 256 subjects: 91 users of the National Health System (NHS), 80 nurses, 47 pharmacists and 38 physicians. A questionnaire examined which of the following measures should be considered as palliative care: hygiene, analgesia, pressure ulcer care, position change, sedation, oxygen administration, urinary catheter, hydration, enteral and parenteral nutrition. Results: More than 50% of the participants think that all the proposed measures can be considered as a palliative care, except parenteral nutrition. There is unanimous agreement to accept analgesia, pressure ulcer care, position change and enteraL nutrition as basic care, but there is disagreement in relation to hygiene (p = 0.000),sedation (p = 0.005), oxygen administration (p = 0.007), urinary catheter (p = 0.011) and parenteral nutrition (p = 0.000). There were not differences of opinion after adjusting for age, sex, religious beliefs, and length of professional experience among the individuals that answered the questionnaire. Conclusion: There is no agreement on which measures should be considered as palliative care. Opinions differ regarding hygiene, sedation, oxygen administration, urinary catheterisation and parenteral nutrition. In comparison to enteral nutrition, many responders believe that parenteral nutrition is a therapeutic option. The opinions shown in this questionnaire were independent from the demographic characteristics of the subjects that answered it.

Palavras-chave : Hydration; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition; Artificial nutrition; Palliative care.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons