SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.110 número4Viabilidad de la enteroscopia monobalón realizada bajo sedación dirigida por endoscopistaEndoscopia y sedación: un binomio inseparable para el gastroenterólogo índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

versão impressa ISSN 1130-0108

Resumo

RUIZ-CURIEL, Ramón; BONILLA-H, Ydaly; BAPTISTA, Alberto  e  BRONSTEIN, Manuel. Sedation with propofol in digestive endoscopy administered by gastroenterologists. Experience in a Venezuelan hospital. Rev. esp. enferm. dig. [online]. 2018, vol.110, n.4, pp.246-249. ISSN 1130-0108.  https://dx.doi.org/10.17235/reed.2018.5185/2017.

Objetives:

propofol is a rapid acting hypnotic that is becoming the drug of choice for sedation in digestive endoscopy worldwide. There is some controversy with regard to the use of propofol by physicians who are not anesthesiologists. We present our experience of the administration of propofol by endoscopist and nursing personnel.

Methods:

this was a retrospective study of sedation in endoscopy. Propofol was exclusively used and administered by the endoscopist who performed the procedure and the nursing staff. All patients included were of a low and moderate surgical risk (ASA I, II and III). No complementary medication was used such as benzodiazepines or opiates.

Results:

a total of 70,696 digestive endoscopy procedures performed between 2002 and 2017 were included in the study. Propofol was administered in an induction bolus of 10 to 50 mg, continuing with intermittent boluses of 10 to 20 mg, according to the patients' response. The incidence of complications was very low, assisted ventilation with a mask was required on 78 (0.11%) occasions. Only one case required endotracheal intubation and two patients had significant hypotension that required the administration of ephedrine. The average recovery time of all neuropsychomotor functions after the procedure was 15 minutes; 98% of patients reported a good or excellent level of tolerance and clearly remembered the details of the interview one hour after the procedure.

Conclusions:

the use of propofol as a sedative in digestive endoscopy is a safe and effective technique, provided that it is administered and controlled by the endoscopist and nursing staff in properly selected patients. This allows gastroenterologists to achieve adequate sedation.

Palavras-chave : Sedation with propofol by non-anesthesiologists; Sedation in digestive endoscopy; Complications of sedation.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol | Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )