SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número2Estudio de los efectos del anclaje en razonamientos judiciales en casos de disputa por la guardia y custodiaAnálisis de contenido de las declaraciones de testigos: evaluación de la validez científica y judicial de la hipótesis y la prueba forense índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Acción Psicológica

versão On-line ISSN 2255-1271versão impressa ISSN 1578-908X

Resumo

FARINA, Francisca; PARADA, Vanesa; NOVO, Mercedes  e  SEIJO, Dolores. Parenting coordinator: an analysis of Spanish judicial reasoning. Acción psicol. [online]. 2017, vol.14, n.2, pp.157-170.  Epub 11-Set-2023. ISSN 2255-1271.  https://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.1.21346.

A parenting coordinator (PC) is a professional who intervenes in judicial contexts involving high conflict parental litigation in order to safeguard the child's best interest, as well as dealing with issues concerning coparenting. This new role has been the object of specific directives from international professional associations such as the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC, 2006), and the American Psychological Association (APA, 2012), who have established guidelines for professional practice. The figure of the PC has been introduced only recently in Spain, with Catalonia being the first autonomous communities to do so. Bearing these circumstances in mind, this study aims to assess the impact of this new figure on judicial judgements by examining both the legal reasoning, and the judges' rationale guiding the professional practice of this figure. Judicial judgements from the CENDOJ database involving the figure of the Parenting coordinator were analysed. The results obtained shed light on the legal reasoning cited by judicial decision-makers in their judgements and the criteria employed to justify this new figure and its correspondence with international guidelines. Judgements were found to be grounded on legal reasoning and the criteria was essentially in accordance with guidelines proposed by international associations. Nevertheless, legal decisionmakers must further their understanding concerning the role of the CP in order to assist families with high conflict parents to ensure positive coparenting.

Palavras-chave : Parenting coordinator; Divorce; Couple breakdown; Child's best interest; Judicial judgements.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )