Mi SciELO
Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Archivos de Zootecnia
versión On-line ISSN 1885-4494versión impresa ISSN 0004-0592
Arch. zootec. vol.62 no.239 Córdoba sep. 2013
https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922013000300009
Identification of insulin-like growth factor-I in boar seminal plasma and its influence on sperm quality
Identificação do fator de crescimento semelhante à insulina I no plasma seminal de varrões e sua influência na qualidade espermática
Zangeronimo, M.G.1*; Silva, D.M.2; Murgas, L.D.S.1A; Sousa, R.V.1B; Rocha, L.G.P.1C; Pereira, B.A.1D; Faria, B.G.1E and Veras, G.C.3
1Departamento de Medicina Veterinária. Universidade Federal de Lavras. Lavras, Minas Gerais. Brasil. *zangeronimo@prpg.ufla.br; Alsmurgas@dmv.ufla.br; Brvsousa@dmv.ufla.br; Clgvetp@yahoo.com.br; Dbarbaraap.vet@gmail.com; Ebrunofaria13@hotmail.com
2Departamento de Zootecnia. Universidade Federal de Lavras. Lavras, Minas Gerais. Brasil. daninemoreira@hotmail.com
3Faculdade de Engenharia de Pesca. Universidade Federal do Pará. Campus Bragança, Pará. Brasil. galiveras@hotmail.com
The authors would like to thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Brazil, protocol number 556056/2010-8); FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado de Minas Gerais, Brazil) and MINITUBE do Brazil for financial support of this investigation.
SUMMARY
The present research was carried out to investigate the relationships between spermatozoal parameters and concentrations of IGF-I in the seminal plasma of boar. Semen samples (duplicates) were collected from mature boars (n=27). In each ejaculate, the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics were determined. After centrifugation to separate sperm cells from seminal plasma, concentrations of IGF-I in seminal plasma samples were determined by a human-specific immunoassay kit. The mean concentration of the boar seminal plasma (n=54 samples) IGF-I was 1.5±0.2 ng/mL. There was no correlation (p>0.05) between IGF-I with most of the evaluated parameters. There was only a low negative correlation (-0.29; p=0.0331) between the concentration of IGF-I in seminal plasma and the motility degradation rate. This study suggests that IGF-I in the seminal plasma of boars is not related to initial fresh semen parameters. However, the hormone did increase the duration of sperm motility.
Key words: Boar spermatozoa. Functional membrane integrity. Male sexual function. Spermatic motility.
RESUMO
A presente pesquisa foi realizada para investigar as relações entre os parâmetros dos espermatozóides e as concentrações de IGF-I no plasma seminal de varrões. Amostras de sêmen (duplicatas) foram coletadas de machos maduros (n=27). Em cada ejaculação, as características macroscópicas e microscópicas foram determinadas. Após a centrifugação para separar espermatozóides do plasma seminal, as concentrações de IGF-I em amostras de plasma seminal foram determinadas por kit de imunoensaio humano específico. A concentração média de IGF-I do plasma seminal de varrões foi de 1,5±0,2 ng/mL (n=54 amostras). Não houve correlação (p>0,05) entre IGF-I com a maioria dos parâmetros avaliados. Houve apenas uma correlação baixa negativa (-0,29, p=0,0331) entre a concentração de IGF-I no plasma seminal e a taxa de degradação da motilidade. Este estudo sugere que o IGF-I no plasma seminal de varrões não está relacionado com os parâmetros seminais iniciais do sêmen in natura. No entanto, o hormônio aumentou a duração da motilidade espermática.
Palabras chave: Espermatozóide de varrão. Integridade funcional da membrana. Função sexual do macho. Motilidade espermática.
Introduction
Components of male reproductive function are controlled by endocrine and local regulatory factors. Investigation of fertility in some species has been focused on local regulators of reproductive events, including growth factors and differentiation factors (Wang and Hardy, 2004; Miah et al., 2008; Selvaraju et al., 2009).
Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is a potent mitogenic, metabolic and differentiating polypeptide that is becoming widely recognized as an important regulator of reproductive functions. In the male reproductive tract, IGF-I has been identified in the testis (Hess and Roser, 2001), where it is secreted by Sertoli and Leydig cells (Roser, 2001) under the control of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), respectively (Lejeune et al., 1996). Receptors for IGF-I have also been identified in these cells (Wang and Hardy, 2004; Vanelli et al., 1998). Additionally, these receptors have been identified in other cells such as secondary spermatocytes, spermatids (Vanelli et al., 1998) and spermatozoa (Henricks et al., 1998).
IGF-I has been suggested to be an important factor for germ cell development, maturation and motility of the spermatozoa (Henricks et al., 1998; Glander et al., 1996; Vickers et al., 1999). Furthermore, IGF-I is believed to be involved in spermatogenesis (Tsutura and O'Brien, 1995) and steroidogenesis (Saez, 1994).
The role of IGF proteins as post-testicular regulators of reproductive function has also been examined and an effect of the IGF system on sperm physiology and function in some species has been demonstrated. The concentration of IGF-I in human seminal plasma was correlated (r= 0.75, p=0.00001) to sperm concentration and morphology in one study (Glander et al., 1996). In animals, in vitro addition of IGF-I at physiological concentrations stimulates spermatozoal motility in bovine, stallion and buffalo semen (Selvaraju et al., 2009).
In boars, there was no observed correlation between IGF levels and semen parameters (Hirai et al., 2001). However, more recently it was verified that progressive motility and the induction rate of capacitation and acrosome reaction were increased by IGF-I (Miah et al., 2008). Thus, the relationship between the IGF system and characteristics of semen still remains unclear, especially in production animals, and the role of this hormone on reproductive function must be investigated. Therefore, the present investigation was carried out to investigate the relationships between spermatozoal parameters and concentrations of IGF-I in the seminal plasma of these animals.
Material and Methods
ANIMALS AND SEMEN COLLECTION
The boars used in this study (18 Agroceres-PIC, 8 DB-Danbred and 1 Genetic Pork) were 7-34 months old and were housed in a commercial farm. Whole ejaculates (without the gelatinous fraction) were collected once a week during routine farm operations in January 2010 (2 ejaculates per boar, totalling 54 ejaculates). All ejaculates fulfilled the minimum requirements for use in artificial insemination (>70 % motile spermatozoa, <20 % cytoplasmatic droplets, total sperm number >10x109). Immediately after semen collection and semen analysis, sample of fresh semen was centrifuged at 3360 g for 10 minutes and the supernatant was removed and stored at -20 oC until IGFI analysis.
SPERM ANALYSIS
The ejaculate appearance was visually determined and classified as 1 for aqueous, 2 for serum-milky and 3 for milky aspect. The total ejaculate was weighed on a digital scale. Motility was determined by the amount of moving spermatic cells after putting one drop of semen between a slide and coverslip under optical microscopy and 100x magnification. Sperm vigor was observed under the same conditions by the progressive forward motility of the spermatozoids from 0 (low) to 5 (high). The live and dead test (%) was conducted by counting the number of live cells (without colour) and dead (pink) under optical microscopy (400x) using one drop of semen colour with one drop of eosine-nigrosine (Mies Filho, 1982). The sperm concentration (spermatozoa/mL) was determined by spectrophotometry (Sperma-Cue, Minitub, Germany). The motility degradation rate was determined by incubating 2.0 mL of semen at 37 oC for 2 hours. The rate was observed at the beginning and at the end, and the motility difference between the two moments was divided by the initial motility (Salgueiro et al., 2003). The osmotic resistance was evaluated by adding 100 mL of semen to 1.0 mL of a 100 mOsm/L solution (two parts of distilled water in one part of BTS diluent Beltsville Thawing Solution). The samples were incubated at 37 oC for 40 minutes. Then the amount of spermatozoa (percentage) with twisted (stable membrane) and straight tails (disrupted membrane) were evaluated under optical microscopy (400x). The spermatic morphology (%) was evaluated using a mix of semen and formol-citrate (2.94 %) using a phase contrast microscope (100x). The percentages of acrosome and tail abnormalities, the presence of proximal cytoplasmatic droplets and the total amount of morphological abnormalities were calculated.
In this study, all samples were evaluated by the same operators (three) and sample handling followed the same protocol throughout the study.
QUANTIFICATION OF IGF-I IN SEMINAL PLASMA
Immediately after collection, the semen samples were centrifuged (3 oC, 3360 g for 10 minutes) to remove the supernatant containing the seminal plasma. The seminal plasma was further centrifuged twice to remove more spermatozoa. The separated seminal plasma was stored at -10 oC until assayed for free IGF-I concentration. The IGF-I concentration in seminal plasma was determined by a specific immunoassay kit (Human IGF-I ELISA RayBiotek-USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. This kit was used to assess boar seminal plasma IGF-I because the homology of the amino acid sequence of human and swine IGF-I has been reported to be 100 % (Tavakkol et al., 1998). Concentrations of free IGF-I were expressed as nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) of seminal plasma. The assay had a sensitivity of 0.2 ng/mL, as determined by the manufacturer.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis was performed with SAS System for Windows. The relationships between free IGF-I concentrations in seminal plasma (n=54 ejaculates) and the semen parameters were examined using the Spearman's correlation coefficient because the IGF-I data were not normally distributed (as determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test). Values of p>0.05 were considered significant.
Results
As shown in table I, the mean boar seminal plasma IGF-I concentration (mean ± SD) was 1.50 ± 0.20 ng/mL, ranging from 1.39 to 2.44.
Levels of IGF-I in seminal plasma were not related (p>0.05) to the majority of semen parameters. Only a low negative correlation (p<0.05) was observed between the IGF-I concentration in seminal plasma and the motility degradation rate.
Discussion
In this research, all values of seminal parameters were technically acceptable, confirming that the boars had normal sexual characteristics and were adequate and sound for reproduction.
The concentrations of free IGF-I in seminal plasma of the boars were low, ranging from 1.39 to 2.44 ng/mL, with a mean of 1.5±0.20 ng/mL. Other previous studies (Hirai et al., 2001) obtained total values ranging from 8.4 to 22.2 ng/mL in Pietrain boars, aged 22-44 months, whereas Lackey et al. (2002) showed values ranging from 5.0 to 25 ng/mL in Duroc and Yorkshire boars. The variability in results may be related to the presence in the semen of IGFBP (insulin-like growth factor binding protein), that represent a family of proteins that help to modulate IGF action in complex ways that involve inhibiting it by preventing its binding to the IGF-I receptor (Hwa et al., 1999).
The IGF's are known to bind the IGF-I receptor, the insulin receptor, the IGF-II receptor, the insulin-related receptor and possibly other receptors. The IGF-I receptor is the main physiologic receptor for IGFI, having significantly higher affinity for this hormone. Thus, measuring free IGF-I concentration is important to determine some physiological functions in spermatozoa (Cohen et al., 1991). In other studies, total IGF-I was measured. For instance, in buffaloes, Selvaraju et al. (2009) observed values from 41.41 to 198.95 ng/mL. The values ranged from 116 to 144 ng/mL (Henricks et al., 1998) in bovine seminal plasma, and in stallion from 10.2 to 10.4 ng/mL (Macpherson et al., 2002). These values show that the levels in boars and stallions are similar to those in humans (Lackey et al., 2002), but much lower than those found in cattle and buffaloes. According to these authors, differences in ejaculate volume, levels of growth hormone or steroids and nutritional factors may contribute to the variation in semen IGF-I concentrations.
IGF-I in seminal plasma is primarily of testicular or epididymal origin (Glander et al., 1996). IGF-I production is under the control of the gonadotropins FSH and LH (Lejeune et al., 1996) and depends on testicular development. Hence, several factors affecting gonadotropin secretion and testicular growth may influence IGF-I levels in the seminal plasma, such as genetics and nutrition. Nutrition is the most powerful factor that acts on the neuroendocrine system and controls testicular activity in ruminants (Blache et al., 2000; Brito et al., 2007). In the present study, no difference was observed between the genetic backgrounds (data not shown). In stallions, differences in IGF-I concentrations were not detected between samples from individual animals at different levels of sexual activity, but substantial variation in IGF-I concentrations occurred between stallions (Macpherson et al., 2002).
In the present study, no correlation (p>0.05) was observed between the free IGF-I concentration in the seminal plasma of boars and most of the evaluated seminal parameters, except for the motility degradation rate. The low negative correlation for this parameter (-0.29, p=0.0331) suggests that IGF-I may have some relation with the duration of motility but not with the intensity of movement of sperm cells right after ejaculation. This result suggests that this hormone maintains the movement of sperm for longer periods of time, which is an important role in male fertility. Macpherson et al. (2002) also observed inconsistent results between bovine seminal plasma IGFI and sperm parameters (sperm numbers, morphology and motility). However, these authors observed that sperm morphology and motility were better in some samples that displayed high IGF-I concentrations.
Possible sources of seminal plasma IGF proteins include the testis, epididymis and accessory glands. The source of seminal plasma IGF-I production in men was either the testicular/epididymal tissue or the accessory glands (Glander et al., 1996). These authors observed that the seminal plasma IGF-I concentrations dropped to approximately one-third after vasectomy, thus implicating an IGF-I production in the testis, epididymus or both. A similar occurrence may be true for pigs; however, specific research has not been performed to determine the origin of seminal plasma IGFI in this species. The accessory glands of boars contribute with a significant fluid fraction to the final ejaculate, therefore secretions from these organs could likely include IGF-I.
In growth hormone (GH)-deficient dwarf rats, Vickers et al. (1999) observed that IGFI treatment increased the IGF-I concentration in the seminal vesicle fluid but not in the epididymal fluid, suggesting a role for this hormone in the post-testicular metabolism of the spermatozoa after ejaculation. These authors also observed an improvement in sperm motility and morphology mainly due to changes in the IGF-I levels in seminal plasma. It is important to emphasize that in this case, the authors worked with GH-deficient animals, reinforcing the idea of improvement in sperm quality with increa-sing concentrations of IGF in seminal plasma.
The supplementation of IGF-I above physiological concentrations in buffalo semen was shown to increase total and progressive motility when compared with controls during the incubation period (Selvaraju et al., 2009). Similar results were found in previous research using bovine (Henricks et al., 1998), human (Miao et al., 1998), equine (Chanpion et al., 2002) and swine (Miah et al., 2008) samples. IGF-I might act as a chemokinetic factor involved in the regulation of cell movement, because IGF-I receptors have been reported to be found on spermatozoa (Henricks et al., 1998). Spermatozoal motility and velocity indirectly reflect their mitochondrial function. IGFs in neuronal cells prevent mitochondrial dysfunction when exposed to glutathionedepleting agents, maintain calcium homeostasis and increase cell survival (Sortino and Canonico, 1996). If IGFs act as antioxidants, this would then result in increased sperm viability. Thus, it is conceivable that the effect of IGF-I in increasing spermatozoal motility during incubation in the present study might be due to the direct effect through the IGF-I receptor on the spermatozoa.
It was suggested that IGF-I might maintain motility through energy uptake or due to its antioxidant effect in these species, with these effects being linked to spermatozoal metabolism, capacitation and acrosomal reaction (Selvaraju et al., 2009), which would be related to the attachment and penetration of the oocyte. These authors observed that IGF-I increased the fructose uptake and decreased the lipid peroxidation level of buffalo spermatozoa. This latter effect suggests a positive effect of IGF-I on functional membrane integrity due to spermatozoal membrane stability.
Both the spermatozoal motility and functional membrane integrity had a direct correlation with the reduction in lipid peroxidation (Suleiman et al., 1996). A direct effect of IGF-I on superoxide dismutase activity and total antioxidant status in rodent (bank vole) testis has been reported (Gancarczyk et al., 2006). Hence, it is possible that higher IGF-I concentrations would improve the spermatozoal membrane integrity during the incubation period. In addition, there are indications that IGFs induce increased ion transport (Miah et al., 2008), which may result in increased intracellular calcium levels. Hyperactivation is known to require extracellular calcium (Suarez et al., 1993) and may therefore be partially regulated by growth factors. This also partially explains the higher duration of motility in samples with a higher IGF-I concentration in the present study.
Based on IGF-I levels, fertile bulls can also be selected for artificial insemination (Yilmaz et al., 1999). Nevertheless, no information is available on the role of IGFI in boars with low semen fertility. Moreover, the in vivo quantity of IGF-I binding protein in the boar spermatozoal membrane is not known. In bovine semen, an average of 1000 receptors per cell was estimated (Henricks et al., 1998). The knowledge of the number of receptors in different species may help to elucidate the true role of IGF-I in spermatozoal metabolism and the usefulness of this hormone in the improvement of artificial insemination programs. Pregnancy rates were higher for horses with high seminal plasma IGF-I levels (Macpherson et al., 2002), which is suggestive of the effects of IGF-I on sperm function.
Conclusion
The concentrations of IGF-I in seminal plasma of boars were not related to initial fresh semen parameters, but this hormone may increase the duration of sperm motility.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Veterinary Medicine Department from Federal University of Lavras for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work.
References
1. Blache, D.; Chagas, L.M.; Blackberry, M.A.; Vercoe, P.E. and Martin, G.B. 2000. Metabolic factors affecting the reproductive axis in male sheep. J Reprod Fertil, 120: 1-11. [ Links ]
2. Brito, L.F.; Barth, A.D.; Rawlings, N.C.; Wilde, R.E.; Crews, D.H. Jr.; Boisclair, Y.R.; Ehrhardt, R.A. and Kastelic, J.P. 2007. Effect of nutrition during calfhood and peripubertal period on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotropins and testosterone concentrations, and on sexual development in bulls. Domest Anim Endocrin, 33: 1-18. [ Links ]
3. Champion, Z.J.; Vickers, M.H.; Gravance, C.G.; Breier, B.H. and Casey, P.J. 2002. Growth hormone or insulin-like growth factor-I extends longevity of equine spermatozoa in vitro. Theriogenology, 57: 1793-1800. [ Links ]
4. Cohen, P.; Peehl, D.M.; Lamson, G. and Rosenfeld, R.G. 1991. Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF receptors, and IGF-binding proteins in primary cultures of prostate epithelial cells. J Clin Endocr Metab, 73: 401-407. [ Links ]
5. Gancarczyk, M.; Kukliñska, M.; Sadowska, J.; Strzezek, J. and Biliñska, B. 2006. Aromatization and antioxidant capacity in the testis of seasonally breeding bank voles: effects of LH, PRL and IGF-I. Theriogenology, 65: 1376-1391. [ Links ]
6. Glander, H.J.; Kratzsch, J.; Weisbrich, C.H. and Birkenmeier, G. 1996. Insulin-like growth factor-I and α-2-macroglobulin in seminal plasma correlate with semen quality. Hum Reprod, 11: 2454-2460. [ Links ]
7. Henricks, D.M.; Kouba, A.J.; Lackey, B.R.; Boone, W.R. and Gray, S.L. 1998. Identification of insulin-like growth factor I in bovine seminal plasma and its receptor on spermatozoa: influence on sperm motility. Biol Reprod, 59: 330-337. [ Links ]
8. Hess, M.F. and Roser, J.F. 2001. The effects of age and fertility status on plasma and intratesticular insulin-like growth factor-I concentration in stallions. Theriogenology, 56: 723-733. [ Links ]
9. Hirai, M.; Boersma, A.; Hoeflich, A.; Wolf, E.; Foll, J.; Aumüller, T.R. and Braun, J. 2001. Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl, 22: 104-110. [ Links ]
10. Hwa, V.; Oh, Y. and Rosenfeld, R.G. 1999. The insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Endocr Rev, 20: 761-787. [ Links ]
11. Lackey, B.R.; Gray, S.L. and Henricks, D.M. 2002. Measurement of leptin and insulin-like growth factor-I in seminal plasma from different species. Physiol Res, 51: 309-3121. [ Links ]
12. Lejeune, H.; Chuzel, F.; Thomas, T.; Avallet, O.; Habert, R.; Durand, P. and Saez, J. 1996. Paracrine regulation of Leydig cells. Ann Endocrinol-Paris, 57: 55-63. [ Links ]
13. Macpherson, M.L.; Simmen, R.C.M; Simmen, F.A.; Hernandez, J.; Sheerin, B.R.; Varner, D.D.; Loomis, P.; Cadario, M.E.; Miller, C.D.; Brinsko, S.P.; Rigby, S. and Blanchard, T.L. 2002. Insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 and -5 in equine seminal plasma: association with sperm characteristics and fertility. Biol Reprod, 67: 648-654. [ Links ]
14. Miao, Z.R.; Lin, T.K.; Bongso, T.A.; Zhou, X.; Cohen, P. and Lee, K.O. 1998. Effect of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins on in vitro sperm motility. Clin Endocrinol, 49: 235-239. [ Links ]
15. Miah, A.G.; Salma, U.; Takagi, Y.; Kohsaka, T.; Hamano, K.I. and Tsujii, H. 2008. Effects of relaxin and IGF-I on capacitation, acrosome reaction, cholesterol efflux and utilization of labeled and unlabeled glucose in porcine spermatozoa. Reprod Med Biol, 7: 29-36. [ Links ]
16. Mies Filho, A. 1982. Reprodução dos animais e inseminação artificial. 5.a ed. Sulina. Porto Alegre. 783 pp. [ Links ]
17. Roser, J.F. 2001. Endocrine and paracrine control of sperm production in stallions. Anim Reprod Sci, 68: 139-151. [ Links ]
18. Saez, J.M. 1994. Leydig cells: endocrine, paracrine, autocrine regulation. Endocr Rev, 15: 574-626. [ Links ]
19. Salgueiro, C.C.M.; Mateos-Rex, E.; Sampaio Neto, J.C. and Nunes, N.F. 2003. Utilization of different extenders and methods for the freezing of Murciano-Granadina buck semen. Braz J Anim Reprod, 27: 625-630. [ Links ]
20. Selvaraju, S.; Reddy, I.J.; Nandi, S.; Rao, S.B.N. and Ravindra, J.P. 2009. Influence of IGF-I on buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) spermatozoa motility, membrane integrity, lipid peroxidation and fructose uptake in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci, 113: 60-70. [ Links ]
21. Sortino, M.F. and Canonico, P.L. 1996. Neuroprotective effects of insulin-like growth factor-I in immortalized hypothalamic cells. Endocrinology, 37: 1418-1425. [ Links ]
22. Suarez, S.S.; Varosi, S.M. and Pai, X. 1993. Intracellular calcium increases with hyperactivation in intact, moving hamster sperm and oscillates with the flagellar beat cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 90: 4660-4664. [ Links ]
23. Suleiman, S.A.; Ali, M.E.; Zaki, Z.M.; El-Malik, E.M. and Nasr, M.A. 1996. Lipid peroxidation and human sperm motility: protective role of vitamin E. J Androl, 17: 530-537. [ Links ]
24. Tavakkol, A.; Simmen, F.A. and Simmen, R.C. 1998. Porcine insulin-like growth factor-I (pIGF-I): Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning and uterine expression of messenger ribonucleic acid cloning evolutionarily conserved IGFI peptides. Mol Endocrinol, 2: 674-681. [ Links ]
25. Tsutura, J.K. and O'Brien, D.O. 1995. Sertoli cell-spermatogenic interactions: insulin-like growth factor II/cation-independent mannose-6phosphate receptor mediates changes in spermatogenic cycle gene expression in mice. Biol Reprod, 53: 1454-1464. [ Links ]
26. Vanelli, B.G.; Barni, T.; Orlando, C.; Natali, A.; Serio, M. and Balboni, G. 1998. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the IGF-I receptor in the human testis: an immunohistochemical study. Fertil Steril, 49: 666-669. [ Links ]
27. Vickers, M.H.; Casey, P.J.; Champion, Z.J.; Gravance, C.G. and Breier, B.H. 1999. IGF-I treatment increases motility and improves morphology of immature spermatozoa in the GH-deficient dwarf (dw/dw) rat. Growth Horm IGF Res, 9: 236-240. [ Links ]
28. Wang, G. and Hardy, M.P. 2004. Development of Leydig cells in the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) knockout mouse: effects of IGF-I replacement and gonadotropic stimulation. Biol Reprod, 70: 632-639. [ Links ]
29. Yilmaz, A.; Davis, M.E. and Simmen, R.C.M. 1999. Reproductive performance of bulls divergently selected on the basis of blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration. J Anim Sci, 77: 835-839. [ Links ]
Recibido: 22-6-12.
Aceptado: 13-2-13.