Introduction
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematological disease involving the clonal proliferation of mature and immunoincompetent B lymphocytes. Clinical manifestations are derived from lymphocytic and progressive bone marrow infiltration, lymph nodes and other tissues. The main manifestations include: asthenia, anemia syndrome, thrombocytopenia and infections. B symptoms are also common (> 38 °C unexplained fever, night sweats and unexplained weight loss). Adult leukemia has the largest incidence in Western countries, accounting for 20-40% of all. A total of 70% of patients are diagnosed after age 65, and it is more prevalent in men1.
Venetoclax is one of the approved therapies for the treatment of CLL, a small molecule that acts as a BCL-2 antiapoptotic protein selective inhibitor2. One of serious adverse reactions that can produce is the autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), a rare disease that affects all ages. Autoerythrocyte sensitization (coated autoantibodies) hemolysis is its main feature. Those autoantibodies are eliminated by the macrophage system, especially in the spleen. Diagnostic confirmation is based on a positive Coombs3 test result. AIHA occurs because of medication, but it also may be secondary to systemic diseases, infections, primary immunodeficiencies or other autoimmune diseases3,4.
AIHA is characterized by a decrease in hemoglobin levels and in acute clinical or variable factors, depending on the patient. Initial treatment is based on corticosteroids for a long period. As a result, many patients develop resistance, thus the use of a second-line therapy with either rituximab, splenectomy or immunosuppressive drugs is required3.
Case description
Male patient, 74 years old, diagnosed in September 2010 with Type B LLC, stage I according to Rai classification1 (lymphocytosis and lymphade-nopathy) and stage B as rated by Binet1 (hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL; platelets ≥ 100,000 mm3/L and three or more affected lymphatic areas). Retired, active in rural life and no known drug allergies. As medical antecedents of interest, the patient presents prostate syndrome.
The patient received several treatment lines: alemtuzumab, six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) and ibrutinib. After progression of the disease to all lines received, the patient presented a good general condition (ECOG -PS 0-1), and as a fourth-line treatment, venetoclax was requested through the application of Special Situations of the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS by its Spanish acronym).
The drug’s administration requires a dose escalation from daily 20 mg to 400 mg in five weeks, close monitoring of analytical parameters and administration of concomitant medication for its high risk of tumor lysis syndrome.
The patient was hospitalized to start treatment in March 2017 to prevent tumor lysis syndrome, where he was administered with high hydration, allopurinol 100 mg/day and rasburicase 0.2 mg/kg/day. These measures help eliminate toxic metabolites such as uric acid, potassium or phosphorus more quickly.
After hospitalization, the patient was discharged with the maximum dose of venetoclax, highlighting as adverse event a febrile neutropenia that was resolved with the temporary suspension of the drug and administration of filgrastim.
In April 2018, the patient came to the hospital for minimal effort dyspnea, tachypnea and asthenia that prevented him the development of daily activities. The patient was tending to somnolence and high fatigue without edemas or oliguria. Analytical results of interest: hemoglobin 5.7 g/dL, hematocrit 17.4%, mean corpuscular volume 123.4 fL, 4.08 x 103 leucocytes/mm3, neutrophils 0.97 x 103/mm3.
Initially two packed erythrocytes were prescribed, and levels of hemoglobin decreased further. Peripheral blood smear was requested and Coombs test was performed, which was positive for AIHA.
AIHA treatment protocol was initiated with corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 1,000 mg every 24 hours) intravenously and avoided blood transfusions to prevent further hemolysis. Treatment with venetoclax was suspended as found to be related to cause AIHA.
After several days of treatment with corticosteroids without any hemoglobin levels improvement, intravenous rituximab as second line treatment was initiated, following the standard guidelines: weekly regimen of 375 mg/m2 for four weeks. Hemoglobin levels soared up to 9 g/dL, allowing hospital discharge and outpatient monitoring. AIHA was reported as a possible adverse reaction to venetoclax was reported to the Autonomic Pharmaco-vigilance Center.
Discussion
Venetoclax is a relatively new drug and the available scientific evidence regarding its safety is limited. Although not stated in the data sheet2, as AIHA being an adverse effect, it has been reported in studies such as the one published in 2016 by Stilgenbauer et al.5. Furthermore, the AEMPS positioning report reflects that 4.4% of patients included in venetoclax clinical trials experienced this reaction6. In EudraVigilance’s database of adverse effects throughout Europe, there are seven AIHA reports related to venetoclax (January, 2019).
The mechanism by which venetoclax can produce AIHA is poorly understood. There are two described main ways in which a drug can produce AIHA: by altering erythrocytes antigens, which produce antibodies that cross-react with unaltered antigens; and by the association of the drug with the erythrocyte structures, which generates an antigen that triggers an immune reaction7. Paradoxically, venetoclax is used to treat AIHA, when actually, it carries a known adverse reaction, as stated in the study published by Lacerda et al.8.
The adverse reaction appears to be related to the use of venetoclax, although it can not be ruled out to be a secondary underlying pathology for the patient. The development of secondary autoimmune cytopenias in CLL is frequently observed, especially AIHA (10-15%) and thrombocytopenia (2-15%)9.
The drug’s withdrawal and initiation of treatment achieved an improvement in the patient’s hemoglobin levels, as well as his clinical stability. For this reason, AIHA was mainly related to venetoclax. Naranjo algorithm10 was applied and the adverse reaction was reported as probable. This case reflects the possibility of developing AIHA with venetoclax and the importance of reporting adverse reactions to new drugs.