SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.61 issue2Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in the previously reimplanted ureter: technical aspects and resultsLaparoscopic anti-reflux plasty: experience of the university of São Paulo author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Archivos Españoles de Urología (Ed. impresa)

Print version ISSN 0004-0614

Abstract

CAPOZZA, N.  and  CAIONE, P.. Modification of the sting procedure for vesicoureteral reflux: ureteral repositioning and injection. Arch. Esp. Urol. [online]. 2008, vol.61, n.2, pp.254-257. ISSN 0004-0614.

Objetive: Over the past 20 years endoscopic treatment (ET) of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has changed the algorithm of reflux management. We describe a modification of the standard subureteral injection (STING) that has contributed to the increased success rate of this procedure. Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2006 192 children, 5 months to 10 years old (mean age 2.8 years) underwent endoscopic treatment for VUR, with injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA). Standard STING procedure was used in 165 patients (235 ureters). A modified STING procedure, here described as "ureteral repositioning and injection" (URI) was used in 27 patients (38 ureters). In the URI technique, the needle was inserted as for standard STING; subsequently the distal part of the ureter was raised and levered towards the lumen of the bladder; Dx/HA was then injected. Renal/bladder ultrasound was performed 1 month after treatment and a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) at 4-6 months. Results: After a single injection the VCUG showed no reflux in 203 ureters of STING group (86%) and in 34 ureters of URI group (91%). Mean injected volume of Dx/HA was 0.7 ml (0.3 - 1.8 ml) for STING and 0.4 ml (0.3 - 0.8 ml) for URI. Conclusion: The modified STING we have proposed, presents some advantages. It is very easy to perform and needs less material to inject. The ureteral repositioning into the bladder, with the support of the implanted material, may reconstruct a true flap-valve mechanism, without the risk of ureteral obstruction.

Keywords : Vesicoureteral reflux; Endoscopy; Pediatrics; Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License