SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número9Fístulas vesicouterinas: Nuestra experiencia tras 25 añosNefroma multilocular quístico: Presentación de un caso índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Actas Urológicas Españolas

versión impresa ISSN 0210-4806

Resumen

MOYANO CALVO, J.L.  y  CASTINEIRAS FERNANDEZ, J.. Ureteroenteric anastomoses: Our experience. The simpliest, the best. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2003, vol.27, n.9, pp.713-717. ISSN 0210-4806.

INTRODUCTION: There are many techiques describe for ureteroenteric anastomoses. We present our experience with three of them inorder to reduce the stenosis rate. METHOD AND MATERIAL: We have done radical cystectomy in 77 patients. Urinary diversion with small bowel in 20 patients (Paduana ileal neobladder) and dstubulized ureterosigmoidostomy (MainzII) in 55. Initialy, we used Le Duc technique, afterward Ricard technique and actually bivalva technique (direct). RESULTS: We have performed Le Duc in 38%, Ricard in 31% and "bivalva" in 27%. Median follow-up are 37,7 months, 19,9 months and 10 months respectivily. Stenosis: 16,7% with Le Duc; 20,5% with Ricard and 9,1% with bivalva technique. Renal anulation: 10,4% with Le Duc; 10,3% with Ricard and 0% with bivalva (p .000). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the less stenosant anastomose is BivalvaIn one. The simpliest technique, the best results. The rate of stenosis is higher when the upper urinary tract is dilatated pre-surgery, independently of the anastomosis technique.

Palabras clave : Stenosis; Ureteroenteric anasatomose; Noebladder.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons