SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número10 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Actas Urológicas Españolas

versión impresa ISSN 0210-4806

Resumen

TELLEZ MARTINEZ-FORNES, Miguel et al. A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2009, vol.33, n.10, pp.1088-1096. ISSN 0210-4806.

Background: Evidence comparing the effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) with Burch colposuspension (CS) over a long-term follow-up is scarce. Purpose: To compare TVT with CS as primary treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Design: Open randomised clinical trial with a three-year follow-up period. Participants: 49 consecutive women aged 35 to 70 with SUI demonstrated by a urodynamic study. Setting: Urology department of Severo Ochoa general hospital in Leganés, Madrid, Spain. Intervention: 24 random patients treated with TVT and 25 with CS. Measurements: Main variable: assessment before treatment and at six months, one year and three years after the operation using the incontinence severity symptoms index (SSI) and the incontinence impact symptoms index (SII). Secondary variable: three groups for assessing cure, improvement and failure rates. Results: Time in surgery, consumption of postoperative analgesics and length of the postoperative hospital stay were lower in the TVT group (41.1 ± 10.9 minutes; 6 [2.8-10.5] capsules and 1 [1-2] days vs. 57.1 ± 18.3 minutes, 23.5 [18.0-31.5] capsules and 3 [3-3] days [p < 0.0001]). There was a significant reduction in SSI and SII scores in both groups and no differences in surgical complications, urgency, obstruction, one-hour pad test, urine culture, flowmetry, costs and cure rates at any moment during follow-up (cured/improved 76.2%, 78.3% and 77.3% at six months, one year and three years for TVT vs. 87.5%, 87.5% and 91.3% for CS; p = 0.32, p = 0.4 and p = 0.19). Limitations: The trial is open, which can create observer bias. A study with a higher number of patients or a longer follow-up time could show differences between the procedures that we were unable to observe in this study, due to our budget and time limits. Discussion: Based on both short-term and long-term results, TVT is as effective as CS for the treatment of SUI, and has similar subjective cure and surgical complication rates. Time in surgery, consumption of analgesics and length of postoperative hospital stay are all lower in the TVT group. In our clinical setting, with a one-day postoperative stay for TVT, the two procedures have similar costs.

Palabras clave : Urinary incontinence; Stress incontinence; Tension-free vaginal tape; Colposuspension; Randomized clinical trial; Effectiveness; Cost.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )