SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número9Discrepancias entre el diagnóstico clínico y el diagnóstico anatomopatológico en la mortalidad temprana del trasplante pulmonar índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Medicina Intensiva

versión impresa ISSN 0210-5691

Resumen

ESCUDERO, D.  y  RED/CONSEJO IBEROAMERICANO DE DONACION Y TRASPLANTE et al. Brain death in Latin America. Med. Intensiva [online]. 2009, vol.33, n.9, pp.415-423. ISSN 0210-5691.

Objective: To examine the diagnosis of brain death (BD) in Latin America. Background: The term BD has long been used to define the death of an individual despite legal differences and variations in the diagnostic criteria applied in each country. Method: A survey was conducted to gain information on the medical and legal diagnosis of BD in the 21 countries that make up the Latin American Network/Council of Donation and Transplant. Results: All the Latin American countries except for Nicaragua legally recognize BD as the death of the person. To declare a person dead, 2 or 3 doctors are required in most countries. In all the countries, the requirements that must be fulfilled are unresponsive coma, lack of brainstem reflexes and of spontaneous breathing. Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide levels required in the apnea test vary from 50-60mm Hg. The minimum temperature required for a neurological examination ranges from 32°-35°C. The atropine test is mandatory in 7 (35%) countries. The most recommended observation period is 6h, but there is great variation and can be up to 24h. In 8 countries (40%), an instrumental test is obligatory, while in the remaining countries this is only undertaken under special circumstances. In some countries, when organs are not donated for transplant, support measures are not withdrawn, this being more frequent in children. Conclusions: There seems to be some uniformity in the main diagnostic criteria applied, with differences observed in clinical prerequisites, neurological exams, observation time, instrumental tests and the clinical decisions made following a declaration of BD. It is recommended that diagnostic criteria be standardized.

Palabras clave : Brain death; Organ donor; Legislation; Diagnosis; Transplantation.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons