SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 número1Daño renal agudo debido a inyección intramuscular excesiva y prolongada de suplementos veterinarios con vitaminas A, D y E: serie de 16 casosUso de C4d como herramienta diagnóstica para clasificar la glomerulonefritis membranoproliferativa índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Nefrología (Madrid)

versão On-line ISSN 1989-2284versão impressa ISSN 0211-6995

Resumo

ESTEVE, Vicent et al. The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle strength, functional capacity and body composition in haemodialysis patients. Nefrología (Madr.) [online]. 2017, vol.37, n.1, pp.68-77. ISSN 1989-2284.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2016.05.010.

Introduction:

Haemodialysis (HD) patients are characterised by significant muscle loss. Recently, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has emerged as a new therapeutic alternative to improve these patients’ physical condition. To date, no studies on the effects of NMES on body composition in HD patients have been published.

Objective:

To analyse the effect of NMES on muscle strength, functional capacity and body composition in our HD patients.

Material and methods:

A 12-week, single-centre, prospective study. The patients were assigned to an electrical stimulation (ES) or control (CO) group. The ES group was subjected to intradialytic electrical stimulation of the quadriceps (Compex® Theta 500i), while the CO group received standard HD care. We analysed the following: 1) nutritional parameters; 2) muscle composition of the quadriceps; 3) maximum quadriceps extension strength (mes) and hand-grip (HG); 4) «sit to stand to sit» (STS10) and «six-minute walking test» (6MWT); 5) body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis).

Results:

Of 20 patients, 55% were men. Mean age 67.7 years, 30.3 months in HD. Main aetiology: DM (35%). In the ES group were 13 patients, and 7 in the CO group. At the end of the study, an improvement was only observed in the ES group (* P < .05): MES* (11.7 ± 7.1 vs. 13.4 ± 7.4 kg), STS10 (39.3 ± 15.5 vs. 35.8 ± 13.7 s) and 6MWT*(9.9%, 293.2 vs. 325.2 m). Furthermore, increased quadriceps muscle area (QMA*: 128.6 ± 30.2 vs. 144.6 ± 22.4 cm2) and lowered quadriceps fat area (QFA*: 76.5 ± 26.9 vs. 62.1 ± 20.1 cm2) were observed. No relevant changes in body composition, nutritional parameters and dialysis adequacy were found.

Conclusions:

1) NMES improved muscle strength, functional capacity and quadriceps muscle composition in our patients. 2) Based on the results obtained, NMES could be a new therapeutic alternative to prevent muscle atrophy and progressive physical deterioration. 3) However, future studies are necessary to establish the potential beneficial effects of NMES in HD patients.

Palavras-chave : Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Body composition; Haemodialysis.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )