SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número6Serología hepatitis C: estudio de prevalencia en población post mortemPrevalencia de infección nosocomial en hospitales universitarios de La Habana, Cuba índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Anales de Medicina Interna

versión impresa ISSN 0212-7199

Resumen

ALONSO MARTINEZ, J. L. et al. Utility of the clinical models for predicting pulmonary thromboembolism. An. Med. Interna (Madrid) [online]. 2006, vol.23, n.6, pp.264-268. ISSN 0212-7199.

Objective: We considered to evaluate the efectivity of the clinical models for predicting pulmonary thromboembolism (PE). Methods: Retrospective application of three published clinical models (Wells or Canadian model, Geneva model and Pisa model) to patients unequivocally diagnosed of acute PE. Results: We evaluate 120 patients [Mean age 71±13 years, males 63 (52%)]: Nineteen (16%) diagnosed with pulmonary arteriography and 101 (84%) diagnosed with helical computed tomography. In the Canadian model 24% patients were of high clinical probability, 59% intermediate and 17% low clinical probability. In Geneva model 21% patients belonged to high clinical probability, 69% intermediate and 10% low clinical probability. In Pisa model 49% patients were of high clinical probability, 45% intermediate and 6% of low clinical probability. Sensitivity was 0.59, 0.67 and 0.89 respectively. Factors associated with low probability were in Canadian model the heart rate, the absence of signs of deep venous thrombosis, the presence of an alternative diagnosis and the low rate of cancer. In Geneva model, age, normal heart rate and PaO2 higher 70 mm Hg were associated with low probability, while in Pisa model normal chest X-Ray and radiological signs of pulmonary oedema were also associated with low clinical probability. Conclusions: Although all three clinical model showed deficiencies Pisa model was the most suitable clinical model for predicting PE. An intermediate clinical probability in the three models, should not serve to rule out PE, besides it is remarkable that patients with low clinical probability still could have PE, providing for clinical models with a limited value.

Palabras clave : Pulmonary thromboembolism; Clinical models; Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons