SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 número1Tendencias de la morbilidad y letalidad hospitalaria por cáncerInfección de prótesis total de rodilla y cadera. Epidemiología descriptiva, terapéutica y evolución en un hospital de segundo nivel durante 10 años índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Anales de Medicina Interna

versión impresa ISSN 0212-7199

Resumen

DE LUIS, D. A. et al. Comparation of short term acceptability of three oral nutritional supplements. An. Med. Interna (Madrid) [online]. 2007, vol.24, n.1, pp.15-18. ISSN 0212-7199.

Background: Although liquid supplements are formulated to provide extra energy, minerals, vitamins and proteins, much of the success of supplementation depends upon the acceptability of the product and the ability of the patients to take large volumes over a period of time. Objective: This study was set up to evaluate the acceptability by haematological cancer patients of 3 commercially available nutritional supplements. Design: A population of 32 haematological cancer patients with reduced food intakes (minor than 50% of calory requirements by Harrist Benedict formula) was enrolled. Supplements were radomnly assigned to each patient. Patients could try the drinks over 2 days period. They were asked to rate the acceptability of supplement, rating the product with a visual scale from 1 to 5 points with five parameters (color, taste, smell, texture, and temperature). Results: Ten patients received first ONS (oral nutritional supplements), 12 second ONS, and 10 third ONS. No epidemiological differences were detected among three groups. Total calorie and macronutrient consumption improved with all supplements. Average values of color, taste, smell, temperature and texture were similar on three oral nutritional supplements (ONS). Analogic scale was analyze in a categoric way with frequencies, too. Frequencies of 1 and 2 points (very good and good responses) with taste were better with second ONS (85%; p < 0.05) than first ONS (50%) and third ONS (55.5%). Frequencies with smell were better with second ONS (83.3%; p < 0.05) than first (55.5%) and third ONS (62.5%). Frequencies with texture were higher in first ONS (90%; p < 0.05) and second ONS (100%; p < 0.05) than third ONS (66.7%). Temperature and color frequencies were similar in all ONS. Conclusions: Oral nutritional supplements had different acceptability in haematological cancer patients. Taste, smell and texture could be better in some ONS in these patients.

Palabras clave : Acceptability; Patients; Oral supplements.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons