SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Facilitadores de la participación e implementación de la subcohorte PELFI de familias inmigrantesComparación de modelos predictivos para la selección de pacientes de alta complejidad índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Gaceta Sanitaria

versión impresa ISSN 0213-9111

Resumen

CRUZ PIQUERAS, Maite; RODRIGUEZ GARCIA DE CORTAZAR, Ainhoa; HORTAL CARMONA, Joaquín  y  PADILLA BERNALDEZ, Javier. Vaccine hesitancy: discourse analysis of parents who have not fully or partially vaccinated their children. Gac Sanit [online]. 2019, vol.33, n.1, pp.53-59.  Epub 28-Oct-2019. ISSN 0213-9111.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.07.004.

Objective

To analyse and understand vaccination hesitancy discourses, particularly those of people who have decided not to vaccinate their sons and daughters.

Methods

Qualitative study of five individual interviews and two focus groups with people who chose not to vaccinate their children in the province of Granada (Spain).

Results

Mothers and fathers manifest a system of health beliefs different to the biomedical paradigm. From an ethical point of view, they justify their position based on the right to autonomy and responsibility for their decisions. Alleged specific reasons: they doubt administration of several vaccines simultaneously at an early age in a systematic way and without individualising each case; they fear adverse effects and do not understand the variations of the vaccination schedule.

Conclusions

These vaccination hesitancy discourses respond to the individual vs collective conflict; parents defend their right to bring up their children without any interference from the state and focus their responsibility on the individual welfare of their sons and daughters, regardless of the consequences that their actions might have on the collective. In their management of risks, they consider those derived from vaccination more relevant than the individual or collective consequences of not doing so. The vaccines generating most doubts are the more controversial ones within the scientific world. Transparency in communication of adverse effects; authorities respect for other health/disease concepts; banishment of the term “anti-vaccines” from the media and scientific vocabulary, and developing spaces for dialogue are bridges to be built.

Palabras clave : Vaccines; Vaccination hesitancy; Ethics; Public health; Health policy; Qualitative research.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )