SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número4Asociación entre determinantes socioeconómicos y exposición al humo ambiental del tabaco en niñosAsociación del tipo de vehículo con el riesgo de provocar una colisión entre vehículos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Gaceta Sanitaria

versão impressa ISSN 0213-9111

Resumo

MIRANDA-MENDIZABAL, Andrea et al. Knowledge and use of clinical coordination mechanisms in healthcare networks in Latin America. Gac Sanit [online]. 2020, vol.34, n.4, pp.340-349.  Epub 15-Fev-2021. ISSN 0213-9111.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.009.

Objective

To analyze the level of knowledge and use, and the characteristics of use, of care coordination mechanisms in public healthcare networks of six Latin America countries.

Method

Cross-sectional study based on a survey using the COORDENA® questionnaire with primary and secondary care doctors (348 doctors/country) of public healthcare networks in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay (May-October 2015). Analyzed variables: degree of knowledge and use of information coordination (referral/reply letter, discharge report, phone, e-mail) and of clinical management coordination (shared clinical guidelines, joint meetings) mechanisms. Descriptive analyses were conducted.

Results

Knowledge of clinical information coordination mechanisms was high in both care levels and analyzed networks as was the use of referral/reply letter. There was greater variability in the use of discharge reports (from 40.0% in Brazil to 79.4% in Mexico) and, except for Argentina, a low reception reported by primary care doctors stands out (12.3% in Colombia and 55.1% in Uruguay). In contrast, knowledge of clinical management coordination mechanisms was limited, especially among secondary care doctors. It is noteworthy, however, that adherence to clinical guidelines was high (from 83.1% in Mexico to 96.8% in Brazil), while participation in joint meetings varied widely (from 23.7% in Chile to 76.2% in Brazil). The difficulties reported in the use of the mechanisms are related to structural and organizational factors.

Conclusions

The limited knowledge and use of coordination mechanisms shows insufficient diffusion and implementation. Strategies to increase its use are needed, including the related factors.

Palavras-chave : Clinical coordination; Clinical coordination mechanisms; Primary health care; Integrated health care; Latin America.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )