SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue2Oral floor schwannoma: systematic review and case reportDental implants in adults after dentoalveolar injuries: descriptive study author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial

On-line version ISSN 2173-9161Print version ISSN 1130-0558

Abstract

PEREZ, Hernán; BRAVO, Rodrigo; MARDONES, Marcelo  and  ARGANDONA, Juan. Comparative study on the use of post-extraction drainage of impacted third molars. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac [online]. 2016, vol.38, n.2, pp.70-75. ISSN 2173-9161.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maxilo.2014.06.008.

Objectives: To determine the effect of the use of drainage tubes in relation to the inflammatory response and postoperative pain in extractions of impacted lower third molars. Material and methods: An experimental, randomized study on the response of edema and pain was conducted on 20 patients in relation to the use of drainage. The patients included had to have underwent extraction of their 2 impacted lower third molars, which had to be in a similar position. The same surgical procedure was used. A surgical wound was sutured in order to achieve healing at first attempt, and was considered the control side. In the contralateral side, a drainage tube was installed for 48 h in the surgical wound, this being the experimental side. To compare the edema of both sides, a standardized clinical photography and a numerical measurement were taken for each patient, preoperative and 48 h after the surgery. The pain was then assessed using the visual analog scale, 48 h and one week after the surgery. Results: According to this study, the use of a drainage tube decreases, with a statistically significant difference, the postoperative edema compared to the wounds sutured without drainage in the extraction of impacted lower third molars. On the other hand, there were no significant differences regarding the pain response when comparing both sides. Conclusions: The use of drainage after removal of impacted third molars reduces the edema, improving patient comfort in the postoperative period.

Keywords : Drainage; Third molar surgery; Edema.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License