SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 número3Medicamentos termolábiles: intervención farmacéutica como garantía del mantenimiento de la cadena del fríoAnálisis de las causas de suspensión de tratamiento con triple terapia antiviral en pacientes con hepatitis C índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Farmacia Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 2171-8695versión impresa ISSN 1130-6343

Resumen

MARTINEZ BERNABE, E. et al. Clinical decision-making support systems in renal failure. Farm Hosp. [online]. 2014, vol.38, n.3, pp.216-222. ISSN 2171-8695.  https://dx.doi.org/10.7399/FH.2014.38.3.753.

Introduction: Support systems in clinical decision-making use individual characteristics of the patient to generate recommendations to the clinician. Objective: To assess the impact of a tool for adjusting drug dosing in renal failure as a support system in clinical decision-making regarding the level of acceptance of the interventions as well as the time invested by the pharmacist. Method: Non-randomized, prospective and hospital interventional study comparing pre- and post-implementation phases of an automated renal function alert system, carried out at two county hospitals. Forty drugs were monitored before the intervention (2007). The blood work of the patients receiving any of these drugs was reviewed. In case of impaired renal function, an adjustment recommendation was inserted in the medical prescription. If the physician accepted it, it was rated as success. The average time was 1 minute per blood work reviewed and 3 minutes per recommendation. An automated adjustment recommendation system according to renal function with alert pop-ups was implemented in 2008 for 100 drugs. Later (2009), the number of interventions and the success rate for this tool were assessed and compared. Results: Pre-implementation phase: 28,234 electronic medical prescriptions corresponding to a mean number of 205 hospitalized patients/day were validated and 4,035 blood works were reviewed. One hundred and twenty-one pharmaceutical interventions (0.43% of the medical prescriptions) were inserted. A success rate of 33.06% of the interventions was obtained. The time invested by the pharmacist for consulting the blood works and making the recommendations was 73.3 hours (67.25 hours corresponding to patients without renal function impairment and in whom no intervention was made). Post-implementation phase: 26,584 electronic medical orders corresponding to 193 hospitalized patients/day were validated and 1,737 automated interventions were performed (6.53% of total medical orders), of which 65.69% were accepted (success). Conclusions: The implementation of clinical decision-making support systems allows extending the number of patients and drugs monitored, optimizing the time invested by the pharmacist. Simultaneous occurrence of an alert during prescription may have contributed to the greater success rate observed.

Palabras clave : Clinical decision-making support systemas; Automated alert; Renal failure.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons