SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue5Complementary medicine use in cancer patients receiving intravenous antineoplastic treatmentEvaluation of standardized triple intrathecal therapy toxicity in oncohematological adult patients author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Farmacia Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 2171-8695Print version ISSN 1130-6343

Abstract

MORENO GUILLEN, Santiago et al. Cost-utility analysis of the fixed-dose combination of dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine as initial treatment of HIV+ patients in Spain. Farm Hosp. [online]. 2017, vol.41, n.5, pp.601-610. ISSN 2171-8695.  https://dx.doi.org/10.7399/fh.10808.

Objective:

Fixed-dose combinations of antiretroviral drugs have meant an important step forward in simplifying treatment and improving com-pliance and has led to an increased effectiveness of therapy, a viral load decrease and improving the quality of life of patients.

The single-table formulation of dolutegravir with abacavir and lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) is a highly efficacious and well -tolerated once-daily re-gimen for HIV-infected patients. The objective of the study was to assess the incremental cost-utility ratio of the fixed-dose combination of (DTG/ ABC/3TC) versus the combinations emtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz (FTC/TDF/EFV), and darunavir/r (DRV/r) or raltegravir (RAL) with emtrici-tabine/tenofovir (FTC/TDF) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) as initial antiretroviral therapy in patients infected with HIV-1 from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.

Method:

The ARAMIS model, which uses a microsimulation approach to simulate the individual changes in each patient from the start of treatment to death through a Markov chain of descriptive health states of the disease, was adapted to Spain. The alternatives used for comparison were the fixed- dose combination of emtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz (FTC/TDF/ EFV), and the fixed-dose combinations of emtricitabine/tenofovir (FTC/ TDF) or abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) with darunavir/r (DRV/r) or ral-tegravir (RAL). The probability of achieving virological suppression by the treatments included in the model was obtained from clinical trials SINGLE, SPRING-2 and FLAMINGO and the costs were expressed in € (2015). The model use the perspective of the Spanish National Health System, with a lifetime horizon and a discount rate of 3% was applied to cost and effectiveness.

Results:

Treatment initiation with DTG/ABC/3TC was dominant when it was compared with treatment initiation with all the comparators: vs. FTC/TDF/EFV (-67 210.71€/QALY), vs. DRV/r + FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (-1 787 341.44€/QALY), and vs. RAL + FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (-1 005 117.13€/QALY). All the sensitivity analyses performed showed the consistency of these findings.

Conclusions:

With the premises considered, treatment initiation with DTG/ABC/3TC STR appears to be the most cost-effective option in ART-naïve HIV infected patients from the Spanish Health System perspective.

Keywords : HIV treatment; Computer simulation; Cost-Utility analysis.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )