SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue1Relationships between psychological skills and sports injuries in elite cuban softball playersThe detection of high capacities by parents, is their appreciation accurate? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Acción Psicológica

On-line version ISSN 2255-1271Print version ISSN 1578-908X

Abstract

LIMA-LEONARDO, Maria da Glória et al. Assessing the influence of reversed items and force-choice on the work and meaning inventory. Acción psicol. [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.1, pp.103-116.  Epub July 25, 2022. ISSN 2255-1271.  https://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ap.17.1.27330.

Response biases are issues in inventories in positive organizational psychology. The study aims to control the response bias in the assessment of meaning of work through two methods: reversed key items and forced-choice format. The sample consisted of 351 professionals; women constituted 60.0 % of the sample. The participants answered two versions of the instrument for meaning of work: Likert-type items and forced-choice. For both versions, the unifactorial model was the most appropriate for the data available. The results indicate that the random intercepts model fit the Likert data (CFI = .92), as well as the forced-choice model (CFI = .97). Besides, the latent dimension of the forced-choice version did not correlate with acquiescence index (r < .08; p > .05), and approximately 20 % of the variance of the items might be due to the method (Likert or forced-choice). The present study illustrates the importance of response bias control in self-report instruments.

Keywords : work; meaning at work; acquiescence; forced-choice items.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )