SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue38Another me: the case of the human chimerasBioethical conflicts in the healthcare relation derived from work leaves author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Bioética y Derecho

On-line version ISSN 1886-5887

Abstract

PLANA, Maria José. How the European Court of Justice's judgement on Case 19/15i single-handedly changed the EU's food information policy. Rev. Bioética y Derecho [online]. 2016, n.38, pp.119-129. ISSN 1886-5887.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1344/rbd2016.38.17049.

The European Court of Justice is asked by the German courts to determine if the European Union's legal framework on the use of nutrition and health claims in the advertising of food products applies to commercial communication that is directly forwarded by food business operators to health professionals. According to this ruling, because these professionals are not in a position to review all upcoming scientific studies and because of the complexity of the claims, they need to be protected from misleading claims as much as the average consumer. It is the author's view that this Judgment opens the door for the European Commission to define clear rules on how food businesses can approach health professionals when advertising their products.

Keywords : food information; food safety; misleading claims; public health; Regulation 1924/2006; health claims; nutrition claims; health professionals.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License