SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número3Programa educativo afecta positivamente el consumo de grasa, frutas, verduras y actividad física en escolares MexicanosInfluencia de magnesio en la bioquímica del hierro y el estrés oxidativo en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versión On-line ISSN 1699-5198versión impresa ISSN 0212-1611

Nutr. Hosp. vol.30 no.3 Madrid sep. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2014.30.3.7540 

ORIGINAL / Sindrome metabólico

 

The impact of serum uric acid on the diagnostic of metabolic syndrome in apparently healthy Brazilian middle-aged men

El impacto del ácido úrico sérico en el diagnóstico del síndrome metabòlico en brasileños de mediana edad aparentemente saludables

 

 

Alessandro de Oliveira1,2, Helen Hermana Miranda Hermsdorff1, Paula Guedes Cocate1, Josefina Bressan1, Alexandre Azevedo Novello1, Eliziaria Cardoso dos Santos3 y Antônio José Natali4

1Department of Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
2Department of Physical Education Science and Health, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
3Department of General Biology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
4Department of Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

This study was supported by Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FA-PEMIG, Brazil).

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Background: Hyperuricemia is related to Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular diseases, but the use of serum uric acid (UA) to diagnose MetS is currently ignored in clinical practices.
Objectives: To examine the impact of serum UA on the diagnostic of MetS and the relationship of serum UA with cardiometabolic risk factors in apparently healthy Brazilian middle-aged men residents in a city of Minas Gerais.
Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, 289 apparently healthy middle-aged men underwent anthropometric, clinical, sociodemographic and blood serum biochemical evaluation. By using receive operating curve the internal cutoff of serum UA was determined (5.25 mg/dL).
Results: Subjects with two or more components of MetS exhibited higher serum UA as compared to those with one or none component. The inclusion of serum UA ≥ 5.25mg/dL as an additional component of MetS increased the occurrence of this syndrome by 13%. Subjects with UA ≥ 5.25mg/dL showed high prevalence for MetS and association with its components (central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidemia and hypertension) as well as atherogenic risk.
Conclusions: Serum UA has an important impact on the diagnostic of MetS and is related to cardiometabolic risk factors in apparently healthy Brazilian middle-aged men. Its use in clinical practices could aggregate accuracy to diagnose MetS.

Key words: Cardiovascular disease. Hyperuricemia. Aging.


RESUMEN

Introducción: La hiperuricemia viene sido asociada con el síndrome metabòlico (SM) y las enfermedades cardiovasculares, pero el uso del ácido úrico (AU) en el diagnòstico del SM es comúnmente ignorado en la práctica clínica.
Objetivos: Investigar el impacto de las concentraciones de AU en el diagnòstico del SM y la asociaciòn del AU sérico con los factores de riesgo cardiometabòlico en brasileños de mediana edad aparentemente saludables residentes en una ciudad de Minas Gerais.
Métodos: Por medio de un análisis transversal, 289 hombres de mediana edad aparentemente saludables fueron sometidos a evaluaciones para determinaciones de variables antropométricas, clínicas, sociodemograficos y bioquímicas. Para determinar el mejor punto de corte para la concentraciòn del AU sérico con respecto al diagnóstico del SM (5.25 mg/dL) fue utilizada la curva ROC.
Resultados: Sujetos con dos o más componentes del SM han demostrado mayores concentraciones séricas de AU cuando comparados con individuos con uno o ninguno componente. Además, la inclusión del AU > 5.25 mg/dL como un componente adicional en el diagnòstico del SM aumentó la ocurrencia de este síndrome en un 13%. Finalmente, los hombres con AU ≥ 5.25mg/dL presentaron una asociación positiva con componentes del SM (obesidad central, hipertrigliceridemia, dislipemia e hipertensión arterial), así como un mayor riesgo aterogénico.
Conclusión: AU serico tiene un relevante impacto en la ocurrencia del SM, asi como es asociado a reconocidos factores de riesgo cardiometabólico en brasileños de mediana edad aparentemente saludables y, su uso en la práctica clínica podría añadir en la exactitud del diagnóstico del SM.

Palabras clave: Enfermedades cardiovasculares. Hiperuricemia. Envejecimiento.


Abbreviations
MetS: Metabolic Syndrome.
pre-MetS: pre Metabolic Syndrome.
UA: uric acid.
CVD: cardiovascular diseases.
CI: confidence interval.
UFV: Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
ECHR: Ethnic Committee Human Research.
SBP: Systolic blood pressure.
DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.
HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
hs-CRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment.
IR: insulin resistance.
TC: HDL-c: total cholesterol to HDL-c ratio.
TG: HDL-c: triacylglycerol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.

 

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been investigated in the view of its relationship with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and mortality1. Acording to Alberti et al.2, individuals exhibiting three or more of the following components: central obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia (i.e. high triglycerides and/or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) are diagnosed with MetS. As of the accuracy of MetS diagnostic in clinical practices3, recent studies indicated the inclusion of other factors/components to diagnose MetS, such as the levels of cortisol and uric acid (UA)4-5.

In this sense, previous studies showed that serum UA is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and MetS in different populations5-8 In Brazil, such association was observed in adult men of different ages (i.e. from 20 to 82 years) residents in the states of Säo Paulo9,10, Espirito Santo11 and Rio de Janeiro12. Taking into consideration that in Brazil the increase of MetS, CVD and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged individuals is notorious11, it is noteworthy that only the study of Desai et al.10 reported the association of UA and MetS in this specific stage of life. In addition, although previous studies were carried out in the Brazilian southeast region, the most populated and urbanized in this country, no studies were performed in the state of Minas Gerais, where the second largest Brazilian middle-age and elderly population live14. Moreover, the impact of serum UA on the diagnostic of MetS in Brazilian middle-aged men is not known. Such finding could help the early diagnostic of MetS in this population and then improve detection and prevention of related diseases.

Therefore, the aims of this cross-sectional study were, first, to examine the impact of serum UA on the diagnostic of MetS, and then, to verify the relationship of serum UA with cardiometabolic risk factors in a sample of apparently healthy Brazilian middle-aged men residents in a city of Minas Gerais.

 

Methods

Study population

This cross-sectional study was carried out between March and December 2011, in the city of Viçosa (East Region of Minas Gerais) - Brazil. Sample size was calculated by the total number of men in the staff board of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), in February 2011 with ages between 40 and 59 years (1,774 individuals), confidence level of 95%, 21.6 % expected prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian middle-aged men15 and 4.5 % sampling error resulting in 273 participants as a minimal sample size required. The program Epi Info, version 6.04 for cross-sectional studies was used to estimate sample size. Subjects were selected by systematic sampling and replaced if they did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Among 884 interviewees, 586 subjects were excluded according to the following exclusion criteria: body weight alterations ≥ 3kg (n=58), increase or decrease in daily physical activities (i.e. engagement or dropout in regular programs) and/or food intake (i.e. special diet) in the three months preceding the study; occurrence of heart or cerebrovascular diseases, infectious and/or inflammatory diseases, diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver and chronic kidney and/or history of kidney stones, or cancer in the previous ten years (n=63), treatment using diuretics or drugs that could alter food intake and/or metabolism of nutrients (n=459), pacemaker and/or prosthetic limb users (n=2) and elite athletes (n=1) and, throughout the data collection, 14 subjects did not complete all phases. Thus, two hundred eighty-nine subjects concluded all steps of the present study.

The study is in accordance with the resolution 196/1996 from the Brazilian Ministry of Health regarding research involving human subjects and was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Research of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (protocol 069/2010/ECHR). All participants included in the study gave informed written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Anthropometric, blood pressure and hemodynamic measurements

Anthropometric measures (i.e. weigh, height, and waist circumference) were performed using standard procedures, as previously described16. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood (DBP) pressures were measured using an automatic inflation blood pressure monitor (BP3AA1-1, G-Tech, OnboElectronicCo, Schenzen, China), registered at ANVISA (No. 80275310004), following the VI Brazilian Guidelines on Hypertension17.

Blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein and the serum was separated by centrifugation at 2.225 g for 15 min (Sigma 2-3, Sigma Laborzentrifuzen, OsterodeamHarz, Germany) at room temperature and serum aliquots were frozen at - 80 oC to further analyses.

Glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triacylglycerol were determined by standard protocols as previously described16. The atherogenic index was calculated as the total cholesterol to HDL-c ratio (CT:HDL-ratio)18 and triacylglycerol to HDL-c ratio (TG:HDL-c ratio)19.

The serum UA and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were determined by an enzymatic colorimetric and immunoturbidimetric method, respectively, with commercially available kits (Quibasa Química Básica LTDA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil).

Determination of metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk factors

The MetS was diagnosed in individuals who exhibited three or more of the following components: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm (specific value for South American men), fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL, HDL-c < 40 mg/dL, triacylglycerol ≥ 150mg/dl and/or high blood pressure (systolic ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 85 mmHg), according to the criteria and cutoff points suggested by Alberti et al.2.

The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to detected insulin resistance (IR) using an equation proposed by Matthews et al.20 and cutoff value suggested by Genoleze et al.21 (HOMA-IR ≥ 2.71). The following values were set as cardiometabolic risk factors22 : total cholesterol ≥ 200mg/dl and; atherogenic indexes, estimated as the total cholesterol to HDL-c ratio (TC:HDL-c) and triacylglycerol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG:HDL-c) with cutoffs of ≥ 518 and ≥ 3.523, respectively.

Lifestyle

The subjects who participated in this study occupied technical administrative positions, classified as levels A, B, C, D, and E, or professor (high school and college) positions. To evaluate how lifestyle and occupation influenced the serum UA they were grouped according to their education level and positions: Group 1 was composed of technical and administrative staff members, classified as A, B and C, with an education level up to high school. Group 2 was composed of technical and administrative staff members levels D and E and professors, all college-educated.

Participants were asked about smoking (yes / no) and excessive alcohol consumption was defined as intake of over 21 units/wk24.

The habitual physical activity was estimated by the mean number of daily steps (7 consecutive days) measured by the digital pedometer (Digiwalker SW-200, Yamax Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)25. The number of 10,000 steps/day was considered an adequate cutoff point, since it was associated with health-related parameters as well as it was proposed to classify participants as "active"14, 25.

A quantitative food frequency questionnaire validated for the Brazilian population was used to assess the usual dietary intake of the participants26. For each item in the food frequency questionnaire participants reported the frequency of regular intake (daily, weekly or monthly) and the portion size (small, medium or large), which were converted to grams of food intake per day. The energy intake and the consumption of macronutrients were assessed using the software Diet Pro® version 5.5i (AS Systems, Viçosa, Brazil), using two Brazilian nutritional composition table27, 28, for necessary nutritional information not found in the national tables.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive data are presented as mean values and standard deviation or median and interquartile range for continuous variables and frequency for categorical variables, as appropriate. Normal distribution of the data was determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-normally distributed variables were log-transformed before statistical analyses.

Area under curve-receiver operating curve was used to determine the serum UA concentration cutoff that could be used as an additional criterion in the diagnostic of MetS. The UA concentration of 5.25 mg/dL was the best internal cutoff value according to the Youden Index (58.3 % Sens; 70.2 % Spec; 40.6 % and 80.2 % of positive and negative predictive values, respectively - Figure 1). In this sense, the participants of the study were categorized in two groups: high UA and low UA, according to the UA internal cutoff value (5.25 mg/dL) to analyze MetS occurrence as well as metabolic data variation. Such methodological procedure of distributing participants into groups of risk has been previously used in cross-sectional studies16,29. Therefore, to examine the impact of serum UA on the prevalence of MetS, we included the serum UA (≥ 5.25 mg/dL) as an additional component of MetS and recalculated the MetS prevalence as mentioned above.

 

 

Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed by the parametric Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test or McNemar test as appropriate. For comparisons among three or more groups, ANOVA one-way followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test was applied. The prevalence ratio was determined by Poisson regression with a confidence interval of 95 % to assess the associations of UA cutoff value found in the present study with the occurrence of MetS and with cardiometabolic risk factors (hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, coronary risks, and high blood pressure). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS,Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows 7 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and STATA 9.1. The results were considered statistically significant at the .05 level.

 

Results

The participants presented the following prevalence: 87.7% for dyslipidemia; 27.1 % for hypertriglyceridemia, 42 % for pre-hypertension, 21.1% for hypertension, 18.2 % for hyperglycemia and 29.1 % for MetS. In addition, 34.6 % and 31.2 % of subjects showed elevated TC:HDL-c ratio and TG:HDL-c ratio, respectively.

To analyze the study population mean serum UA concentration according to the presence of components of MetS the individuals were subdivided into four groups: no component; one component; two components or pre-MetS; and three or more components or MetS. Subjects in the MetS group showed higher concentrations of UA as compared to those in the other groups and individuals in the Pre-Mets group exhibited higher UA than those in the group with no component (Figure 2).

 

 

We used the internal serum cutoff as the serum UA concentration to be used as an additional criterion in the diagnostic of MetS. The MetS group showed more individuals with UA ≥ 5.25 mg/dL than the other groups (Figure 3) and the Pre-Mets and 1 component groups had more individuals with ≥ 5.25 mg/dL as compared to no component group (p < .05). In addition, as mentioned above, when using the Alberti et al.2 criteria, the prevalence of MetS was 29.1 % among the study participants. However, when we included serum UA (≥ 5.25 mg/dL) as an additional component for MetS diagnosis, there was a significant increase of 13.0 % in the occurrence of MetS (p < .05; figure 4).

 

 

 

We also observed that those individuals with high serum UA concentration (≥ 5.25 mg/dL) exhibited higher values for body mass index, waist circumference, glucose and lipid biomarkers, blood pressure, atherogenic and IR indexes (table I). The high UA group presented a tendency for more alcohol consumption (p=0.079) (table II) while no between group differences in physical activity level, habitual dietary intake, smoking and work position were observed.

Finally, subjects with high UA (> 5.25 mg/dL) showed significantly high prevalence for central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, atherogenic risk, insulin resistance and MetS, regardless their age, alcohol consumption (model 1) and body mass index (model 2; table III).

 

Discussion

In the present study, we found that higher serum UA values were observed in middle-aged individuals categorized as pre-MetS (i.e. two components) and MetS (i.e. three or more components) groups. In addition, by adding serum UA (> 5.25 mg/dL) to the criteria of Alberti et al., the occurrence of MetS increased by 13%. Moreover, serum UA was significantly associated with MetS and cardiometabolic risk factors, but insulin resistance, in this population.

The internal serum UA value of 5.25 mg/dL was a good cutoff to predict MetS and the prevalence of individuals with UA ≥ 5.25 mg/dL in MetS group was higher than others and, as expected, these individuals had high values for anthropometry as well as for cardiometabolic and inflammatory biomarkers than those in the low UA group. Recent studies have discussed possible explanations for the relationship of increased serum UA with MetS, even in normal range (< 7.0 mg/dL)7, 30. The sustained increase of fatty acids in the liver, which raises the level of serum triacylglycerol and insulin resistance, associated with the de novo synthesis of purine lead to decreases in the UA renal excretion capacity resulting in elevated serum UA6, 31. It is noteworthy that such increase in the urate crystals would result in a low grade inflammation and arteriosclerosis as well as endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress8. In contrast, some studies indicated UA as one important antioxidant element in human biological fluids which is responsible for decreasing over 50% of the free radicals in human blood32. Thus, the high serum UA found in the present study might be working as a protective response against cardiometabolic disorders. Nevertheless, the precise physiological function for UA in this context is not completely understood33.

As of the internal cutoff (≥ 5.25 mg/dL) in our study population, in concert, a previous Brazilian population-based study11 including men aged 25 to 60 years in a seaside town (Vitöria /ES) suggested a similar internal cutoff point (5.3 mg/dL). Of note, in the present study, the internal cutoff point of serum UA was not influenced by lifestyles and eating habits. Thus, the higher prevalence of individuals with UA ≥ 5.25 mg/dL in the MetS group observed here ratify the importance of this parameter in the diagnostic of MetS.

Given the increasing impact of MetS in mortality our results may be helpful and of clinical relevance inasmuch as individuals with serum UA ≥ 5.25 mg/ dL had altered blood pressure, lipid and glycemic parameters (i.e. dyslipidemia; insulin resistance). More importantly, the inclusion of serum UA as an additional component to diagnose MetS showed a significant increase (13%) in the number of individuals diagnosed with MetS such that its prevalence reached 48% in this population. This outcome highlights the usefulness of such component to diagnose MetS and could enable the prevention of acute events due to cardiovascular diseases or glucose disorders in individuals previously undiagnosed.

Along with the above mentioned, as expected, our results demonstrated significant relationship of serum UA with pre-hypertension and hypertension. In this case, it seems that high levels of serum UA activates the renin-angiotensin system and inhibits the endothelial nitric oxide actions resulting in systemic and renal vasoconstriction34. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that high serum UA could be associated with the activation of a defense mechanism against an inflammatory condition35.

Despite the evidence that a serum UA ≥ 5.25mg/ dL could be an independent factor to diagnose MetS and cardiometabolic disorders, this cutoff value did not show significant relationship with HOMA-IR index. It is possible that the small number of subjects above the cutoff for insulin resistance proposed by Genoleze et al.21 made unpractical the statistical analyses. However, we observed that high serum UA was strongly associated with TAG:HDL-c. In fact, recent studies demonstrated that this index is a surrogate for insulin resistance diagnose in the South American population23.

Finally, when we related serum UA with lifestyle and eating habits, it showed positive association with alcohol consumption (> 21 units) only. Although our results support those from previous study7, we did not specify the purine source30 which unable us to explain these findings and it suggests further studies.

The present study has a limitation. Because of the limited value of cross-sectional designs, it is not possible to affirm that the reported associations are causal. Although we have controlled several potential covariates, additional evidence from prospective studies is necessary before a firm conclusion in this issue.

 

Conclusions

In conclusion, serum UA has an important impact on the diagnostic of MetS and is associated to cardio-metabolic risk factors in apparently healthy Brazilian middle-aged men. Its use in clinical practices could aggregate accuracy to diagnose MetS.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the nursing staff for technical assistance and the students who helped in the fieldwork of the study. A.J.N. and J.B. are CNPq fellows.

 

Disclosure Statement

Authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest. The authors wish to thank Bioclin/ Quibasa Quimica Básica LTD® Laboratory for the uric acid and hs-CRP kits.

 

References

1. Grundy SM, Brewer HB, Jr., Cleeman JI, Smith SC, Jr., Lenfant C. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004 Feb;24(2):e13-8.         [ Links ]

2. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1640-5.         [ Links ]

3. Hsieh SD, Muto T, Tsuji H, Arase Y, Murase T. Clustering of other metabolic risk factors in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Metabolism 2010 May;59(5):697-702.         [ Links ]

4. Stalder T, Kirschbaum C, Alexander N, Bornstein SR, Gao W, Miller R, et al. Cortisol in hair and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013 Jun;98(6):2573-80.         [ Links ]

5. Kim ES, Kwon HS, Ahn CW, Lim DJ, Shin JA, Lee SH, et al. Serum uric acid level is associated with metabolic syndrome and microalbuminuria in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):309-13.         [ Links ]

6. Bhole V, Choi JW, Kim SW, de Vera M, Choi H. Serum uric acid levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study. Am J Med 2010 Oct;123(10):957-61.         [ Links ]

7. Osgood K, Krakoff J, Thearle M. Serum uric Acid predicts both current and future components of the metabolic syndrome. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2013 Jun;11(3):157-62.         [ Links ]

8. de Carvalho Vidigal, F, Rosado LEFPL, Rosado GP, Ribeiro RCL, Franceschini SCC. Serum uric acid can predict higher C-reactive protein levels in apparently healthy men. Nutr Hosp, 2014;29(4) 935-40.         [ Links ]

9. de Oliveira EP, Moreto F, Silveira LV, Burini RC. Dietary, anthropometric, and biochemical determinants of uric acid in free-living adults. Nutr J 2013;12:11.         [ Links ]

10. Desai MY, Santos RD, Dalal D, Carvalho JA, Martin DR, Flynn JA, et al. Relation of serum uric acid with metabolic risk factors in asymptomatic middle-aged Brazilian men. Am J Cardiol 2005 Apr 1;95(7):865-8.         [ Links ]

11. Rodrigues SL, Baldo MP, Capingana P, Magalhaes P, Dantas EM, Molina M del C, et al. Gender distribution of serum uric acid and cardiovascular risk factors: population based study. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012 Jan;98(1):13-21.         [ Links ]

12. Barbosa MC, Brandao AA, Pozzan R, Magalhaes ME, Campana EM, Fonseca FL, et al. Association between uric acid and cardiovascular risk variables in a non-hospitalized population. Arq Bras Cardiol 2011 Mar;96(3):212-8.         [ Links ]

13. Mansur Ade P, Favarato D. Mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in Brazil and in the metropolitan region of Sao Paulo: a 2011 update. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012 Aug;99(2):755-61.         [ Links ]

14. Brasil. Censo Demográfico 2010. Brasilia/DF: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística; 2010 (cited 2014 04 de Abril); Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm.         [ Links ]

15. Velasquez-Melendez G, Gazzinelli A, Correa-Oliveira R, Pimenta AM, Kac G. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a rural area of Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J 2007 May 3;125(3):155-62.         [ Links ]

16. Cocate PG, de Oliveira A, Hermsdorff HH, Alfenas RD, Amorim PR, Longo GZ, et al. Benefits and relationship of steps walked per day to cardiometabolic risk factor in Brazilian middle-aged men. J Sci Med Sport 2013 Jun 3.         [ Links ]

17. VI Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensao. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 2010;95:I-III.         [ Links ]

18. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The Framingham Study. JAMA 1986 Nov 28;256(20):2835-8.         [ Links ]

19. Gaziano JM, Hennekens CH, O'Donnell CJ, Breslow JL, Buring JE. Fasting triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation 1997 Oct 21;96(8):2520-5.         [ Links ]

20. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985 Jul;28(7):412-9.         [ Links ]

21. Geloneze B, Tambascia MA. Avaliação laboratorial e diagnóstico da resistência insulínica. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia 2006;50:208-15.         [ Links ]

22. Sposito AC, Caramelli B, Fonseca FA, Bertolami MC, Afiune Neto A, Souza AD, et al. IV Brazilian Guideline for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis prevention: Department of Atherosclerosis of Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007 Apr;88 Suppl 1:2-19.         [ Links ]

23. Salazar MR, Carbajal HA, Espeche WG, Leiva Sisnieguez CE, Balbin E, Dulbecco CA, et al. Relation among the plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration ratio, insulin resistance, and associated cardio-metabolic risk factors in men and women. Am J Cardiol 2012 Jun 15;109(12):1749-53.         [ Links ]

24. Duncan B, Schmidt M, Giugliani E, Duncan MS, C. G. Medicina ambulatorial: condutas de atenção primária baseada em evidências. 4o ed. Porto Alegre/RS: Artmed; 2013.         [ Links ]

25. Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med 2005 Mar;40(3):293-8. 25.         [ Links ]

26. Ribeiro AB, Cardoso MA. Development of a food frequency questionnaire as a tool for programs of chronic diseases prevention. Rev Nutr 2002(15):239-45.         [ Links ]

27. Brazilian Table of Food Composition (TACO) Version IV. Campinas - Brazil2011 18 Sep 2013). Available from: http://www.unicamp.br/nepa.         [ Links ]

28. Philippi ST. Table of food composition: support for nutritional decision. 3rd ed. Barueri, Brazil: Manole; 2012.         [ Links ]

29. Zulet MA, Puchau B, Hermsdorff HH, Navarro C, Martinez JA. Dietary selenium intake is negatively associated with serum sialic acid and metabolic syndrome features in healthy young adults. Nutr Res 2009 Jan;29(1):41-8.         [ Links ]

30. Rho YH, Zhu Y, Choi HK. The epidemiology of uric acid and fructose. Semin Nephrol 2011 Sep;31(5):410-9.         [ Links ]

31. Matsuura F, Yamashita S, Nakamura T, Nishida M, Nozaki S, Funahashi T, et al. Effect of visceral fat accumulation on uric acid metabolism in male obese subjects: visceral fat obesity is linked more closely to overproduction of uric acid than subcutaneous fat obesity. Metabolism 1998 Aug;47(8):929-33.         [ Links ]

32. Glantzounis GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Kappas AM, Galaris DA. Uric acid and oxidative stress. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(32):4145-51.         [ Links ]

33. Torralba KD, De Jesus E, Rachabattula S. The interplay between diet, urate transporters and the risk for gout and hyperuricemia: current and future directions. Int J Rheum Dis 2012 Dec;15(6):499-506.         [ Links ]

34. Mazzali M, Kanbay M, Segal MS, Shafiu M, Jalal D, Feig DI, et al. Uric acid and hypertension: cause or effect? Curr Rheumatol Rep 2010 Apr;12(2):108-17.         [ Links ]

35. Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008 Jun;27(6):608-19.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Alessandro de Oliveira.
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei.
Department of Physical Education Science and Health.
Visconde do Rio Preto Avenue, São João del-Rei,
Minas Gerais, Brazil.
E-mail: alessandro@ufsj.edu.br

Recibido: 24-IV-2014.
Aceptado: 1-VI-2014.

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons