SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número3La importancia de los lácteos en la dieta: más allá del huesoDesplazamiento accidental de la sonda de alimentación enteral con el uso de un dispositivo de fijación de sonda de alimentación dedicado versus cinta adhesiva como método de aseguramiento: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Nutrición Hospitalaria

versão On-line ISSN 1699-5198versão impressa ISSN 0212-1611

Nutr. Hosp. vol.36 no.3 Madrid Mai./Jun. 2019  Epub 10-Fev-2020

https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.2348 

Trabajos Originales

Nutritional profile and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Perfil nutricional y mortalidad en pacientes sometidos a gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea

Marcelo Campos Appel da Silva1  , Priccila Zuchinali3  , Rogério Fleck de Oliveira2  , Caroline Schardong Boligon3  , Caroline Riella3  , Gabriela Soranço Salazar3 

1Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit-Multidisciplinary Nutrition Support Team. Hospital Mãe de Deus. Porto Alegre, RS. Brazil.

2Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit. Hospital Mãe de Deus. Porto Alegre, RS. Brazil.

3Clinical Nutrition Unit-Multidisciplinary Nutrition Support Team. Hospital Mãe de Deus. Porto Alegre, RS. Brazil.

Abstract

Background:

malnutrition is a common problem in hospitalized patients, being associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. Multiple factors contribute to a deficient nutritional status, making malnutrition the cause or consequence of severe diseases. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for long-term administration of enteral nutrition in patients with limited ability for oral intake who have an intact, functional gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine the profile of patients undergoing PEG in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil.

Methods:

single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent PEG from January 1st to December 31st, 2016, in a private tertiary hospital located in southern Brazil. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records, including nutritional status, indications, complications and outcomes.

Results:

one hundred and thirty-three patients underwent PEG at our institution and were eligible for inclusion in the study. Median patient age was 82 years, and 57.9% were females. The main indication for PEG was dementia syndrome, followed by stroke. As much as 68.4% were diagnosed as severely malnourished and 23.0% had procedure-related complications.

Conclusions:

PEG tubes are being increasingly used for enteral nutrition in patients with dysphagia or inability to maintain adequate nutritional intake. The findings of the present study highlight the importance of regular nutritional risk screening by a multidisciplinary team, paying special attention to the patient's nutritional status and conditions that may place the patient at risk of developing dysphagia, with the implementation of measures to minimize malnutrition in hospitalized patients.

Key words: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; Enteral nutrition; Nutritional support; Complications

Resumen

Introducción:

la desnutrición es común en pacientes hospitalizados y se está convirtiendo en causa o consecuencia de enfermedades graves, asociándose a morbilidad, mortalidad y costos aumentados. Múltiples factores contribuyen a un estado nutricional deficiente. La gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea (PEG) es un procedimiento mínimamente invasivo para la administración de nutrición enteral en pacientes con capacidad limitada de ingesta oral que tengan el tracto gastrointestinal intacto y funcional. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar el perfil de pacientes sometidos a PEG en un hospital terciario del sur de Brasil.

Métodos:

estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de todos los pacientes sometidos a PEG del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de 2016 en un hospital terciario privado del sur de Brasil. Se recolectaron los datos retrospectivamente en los registros médicos, incluyendo estado nutricional, indicaciones, complicaciones y evolución.

Resultados:

ciento treinta y tres pacientes se sometieron a PEG en nuestra institución y fueron elegibles para el estudio. La edad mediana fue de 82 años y el 57,9% eran mujeres. Las principales indicaciones para PEG fueron demencia y accidente cerebrovascular. El 68,4% fueron diagnosticados con desnutrición grave y el 23,0% presentaron complicaciones relacionadas al procedimiento.

Conclusiones:

se utilizan cada vez más tubos de PEG para nutrición enteral en pacientes disfágicos o incapaces de mantener una ingesta nutricional adecuada. Nuestros hallazgos señalan la importancia del cribado para riesgo nutricional por un equipo multidisciplinario, con atención especial al estado nutricional del paciente y a condiciones que pueden ponerlo en riesgo para disfagia y la implementación de medidas para minimizar la desnutrición.

Palabras clave: Gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea; Nutrición enteral; Apoyo nutricional; Complicaciones

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition is a common problem in hospitalized patients, being associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs 1,2. Multiple factors contribute to a deficient nutritional status, making malnutrition the cause or consequence of severe diseases. In the hospital setting, the suboptimal prescription of oral, enteral or parenteral nutrition as well as its recognition by the care team have become a matter of concern. Critical clinical conditions predispose individuals to a variety of metabolic and immune responses, leading to lean mass loss, delayed healing, immobility, susceptibility to infections and cognitive impairment 3.

In addition to critical illness, there has been a progressive increase in the age of hospitalized patients, as well as an increase in the diagnosis of neurological diseases and their complications. In 2010, the worldwide prevalence of dementia was estimated at 35.6 million people, and this number is expected to double every 20 years. It is estimated that 4.4 million people live with dementia in the United States, and one million people in Brazil 4. Loss of appetite and dysphagia are characteristics of advanced dementia, placing these patients at increased risk of dehydration, malnutrition, and aspiration of food and liquids, thus requiring intervention 5,6.

Furthermore, besides dementia syndrome, cases of stroke are commonly reported in hospitalized patients. Despite the advances in medical therapies and rehabilitation programs, stroke remains a leading cause of disability in these patients, requiring extensive care. Dysphagia is a common consequence in stroke patients, increasing the risk of malnutrition, which is directly related to increased morbidity and mortality 7,8,9.

In addition to the complex debate over the terminal nature of dementia and other advanced diseases, there are moral, ethical, religious and medical issues related to the risks and benefits of alternative feeding methods in these patients. In selected cases, maintaining oral nutrition may be the option of choice for comfort care. However, for patients with longer life expectancy and at increased risk of aspiration pneumonia or other complications, enteral feeding may be an option 10,11,12.

Regular nutritional risk screening allows early identification of patients who are unable to meet their nutritional needs by oral intake alone, thus guiding nutritional support measures. Patients with inadequate oral intake (< 60% of the energy and protein requirements for two days) should be monitored and referred for complementary diagnosis. The interaction between members of multidisciplinary nutrition support teams has proven highly valuable in the assessment, diagnosis and prevention of complications in hospitalized patients 13,14.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for long-term administration of enteral nutrition in patients with limited ability for oral intake, who have an intact, functional gastrointestinal tract 15.

The aim of this study was to determine the profile of patients undergoing PEG in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent PEG from January 1st to December 31st, 2016, at a private tertiary hospital located in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records. Patients with a PEG tube who underwent the procedure during the study period for tube replacement were excluded.

The PEG technique used in all patients was the pull method described by Gauderer-Ponsky in 1980 16. Commercially available PEG kits from different manufacturers were used. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis with first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin 1 g intravenously), given up to 30 minutes prior to the procedure, except when patients were already receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of other infections 17.

The following data were collected for analysis: length of hospital stay, subjective global assessment (SGA) of nutritional status, indication for PEG, assessment by a speech therapist prior to the indication for the PEG procedure, previous use (and duration of use if applicable) of nasoenteric feeding tubes, time to start enteral feeding after the PEG procedure, occurrence (and time to the development if applicable) of complications, and outcome (discharge or death).

Complications occurring until the outcome (discharge or death) were evaluated and classified as major (buried bumper syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis, peritonitis, bronchoaspiration, metastatic implantation at the stoma site, perforation of hollow viscera or solid organs, major bleeding, extensive or massive hematomas of the gastric or abdominal wall, gastrocutaneous fistula, and early accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube) or minor (peristomal infection, puncture site pain, extravasation of gastric contents, stoma enlargement, dermatitis, overgranulation, minor bleeding, small hematomas, temporary ileus, gastric outlet obstruction, late accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube, and persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after removal of the PEG tube), and as early (within 15 days of PEG) or late (after 15 days of PEG).

All collected data were stored in a password-protected database accessible only to the researchers in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to assess potential associations between categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant for all analyses.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent was waived due to the non-interventional design of the study and retrospective nature of data collection.

RESULTS

During the study period, 133 patients underwent PEG at our institution and were eligible for inclusion in the study. Median patient age was 82 years (IQR, 76-89 years), and most participants (57.9%) were females. The main indication for PEG was dementia syndrome, followed by stroke (Table 1).

A total of 91 (68.4%) patients were diagnosed as severely malnourished, i.e., were classified as SGA-C, and 39 (29.3%) were diagnosed as mildly malnourished (SGA-B).

Table I. Characteristics of patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy 

PEG: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; SGA: subjective global assessment.

The median time from hospital admission to the PEG procedure was < 30 days both for severely malnourished patients and for mildly malnourished or well-nourished patients. Patients developed procedure-related complications in 23.0% of cases, most of which (77.0%) within 15 days of PEG. The most common complication was peristomal infection (23.0%), followed by extravasation of gastric contents (20.0%) and accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube (17.0%) (Fig. 1). Only seven patients had major complications: two cases of aspiration of gastric contents, four cases of buried bumper syndrome, and one case of necrotizing fasciitis. None of these cases resulted in death. There was no difference in the rate of complications between patients who started feeding within four hours and after four hours of the PEG procedure.

Figure 1. Complications of the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy 

The median follow-up was 45 days (IQR, 24-104 days). There were 28 deaths, which were secondary to complications of the underlying disease. When severely malnourished (SGA-C) patients were compared with all others, there was a significant difference in mortality: 26.0% of patients classified as SGA-C died, against 9.5% of patients classified as SGA-A or SGA-B (p = 0.04) (Table I). Time from the PEG procedure to death did not differ between the groups.

DISCUSSION

PEG tubes are being increasingly used for enteral nutrition in patients with dysphagia or inability to maintain adequate nutritional intake. However, despite this perception, there is a paucity of data from the Brazilian population 18,19,20,21.

Although it is known that aging causes varying degrees of anorexia, resulting from the cumulative effects of comorbidities, medications, lifestyle changes, and social and environmental factors 23, we observed that the process of malnutrition in older patients has not been given the same attention as that given to the treatment of other organic diseases. Because not all outpatients are routinely assessed by a nutritionist and their nutritional status is a poorly explored topic in medical evaluations, there is a delay in the identification of insufficient dietary intake in most cases, which also delays the initiation of nutritional intervention. Likewise, malnutrition identified in the hospital setting is often neglected and may adversely affect the outcome of hospitalization, worsening the immune response, delaying the healing process, and increasing the risk of surgical complications 32.

In the present study, 68.4% of patients were severely malnourished before the PEG procedure, while 29.3% were mildly malnourished. In a recent systematic review of 66 studies on disease-related malnutrition in Latin America, the prevalence of malnutrition was 40-60% on hospital admission, with increases in this rate during the course of hospitalization 33. In Brazil, data from the Brazilian National Survey on Hospital Nutritional Assessment (IBRANUTRI), a large multicenter, cross-sectional study assessing the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized patients, show rates similar to those of worldwide studies, with 48.1% of patients diagnosed as malnourished and 12.5% as severely malnourished 36. Older adults, as well as critically ill and surgical patients, are at increased risk of malnutrition, which also increases the costs of care, thus underscoring the need for early nutritional intervention and supporting the suggestion that the timing of introduction of enteral nutrition via PEG should be revisited 34,35.

In our sample, dysphagia secondary to dementia syndrome was the main indication for PEG, accounting for 47% of cases, followed by stroke in 26% of cases. These results are similar to those reported in two other Brazilian cohorts 21,22. This is also consistent with national and international research, which identifies these two conditions as the main indications for PEG, although the representativeness of each condition may vary according to the study population 15,18,19,20.

Dysphagia, whether transient or persistent, is a common manifestation during the natural course of dementia and following a stroke. In both settings, it represents an important risk factor for the aggravation of malnutrition, reducing the chances of rehabilitation and survival 9. In dementia syndromes, patients show progressive difficulty in swallowing, becoming more evident in the advanced stages of the disease 12. Although international guidelines do not recommend the placement of feeding tubes for artificial administration of nutrition in patients with advanced dementia 24,25, this issue remains controversial in clinical practice. In Brazil, the family decision to place or not to place a PEG tube in the patient usually involves cultural, social and religious issues and outweighs the lack of scientific evidence of clinical benefit or improvement in survival.

The PEG tube placement is considered as a safe procedure with a low rate of complications, which are usually of low morbidity and can be easily resolved 26. The rate of minor complications varies widely in the literature, ranging from 2 to 55%, while major complications (aspiration, peritonitis, bleeding and pneumoperitoneum) occur in 5 to 25% of cases 32. In our sample, 23% of patients developed complications. Similar to international studies, peristomal infection, extravasation of gastric contents and accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube were the main complications in our sample 28.

Time to start enteral feeding after PEG tube placement is still a matter of debate among teams that perform the procedure. In our practice, opinions differ as to the best time to start PEG tube nutrition, which occurred within four hours of the procedure in only 35% of cases. Numerous studies, both in the adult and pediatric population, have demonstrated that starting enteral feeding within three to six hours of the PEG procedure is safe and associated with shorter hospital stay and lower costs of care 29,30,31.

Regarding mortality, none of the deaths in our sample were directly related to the PEG procedure. However, there was a higher incidence of death in severely malnourished patients (classified as SGA-C) (p = 0.04), which supports literature reports of a higher mortality rate (12.4% vs 4.7% [RR: 2.63]) in malnourished patients 37. From these data, we can speculate that the deaths in our sample were more closely related to the patient's condition prior to the PEG procedure than to the procedure itself.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study highlight the importance of regular nutritional risk screening by a multidisciplinary team, paying special attention to the patient's nutritional status and conditions, which may place the patient at risk of developing dysphagia, with the implementation of measures to minimize malnutrition in hospitalized patients. Further studies assessing the risks and benefits of PEG for older patients are required before an effective strategy for early nutritional intervention can be devised.

REFERENCES

1. Gopalan S, Khanna S. Enteral nutrition delivery technique. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2003;6(3):313-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.mco.0000068968.34812.14 [ Links ]

2. Arenas Moya D, Plascencia Gaitán A, Ornelas Camacho D, Arenas Márquez H. Hospital malnutrition related to fasting and underfeeding: is it an ethical issue? Nutr Clin Pract 2016;31(3):316-24. DOI: 10.1177/0884533616644182 [ Links ]

3. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Wang M, Day AG. The prevalence of iatrogenic underfeeding in the nutritionally "at-risk" critically ill patient: results of an international, multicenter, prospective study. Clin Nutr 2015;34(4):659-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.07.008 [ Links ]

4. Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9(1):63-75.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007 [ Links ]

5. Luk JK, Chan FH, Hui E, Tse CY. The feeding paradox in advanced dementia: a local perspective. Hong Kong Med J 2017;23(3):306-10. DOI: 10.12809/hkmj166110 [ Links ]

6. Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, Shaffer ML, Jones RN, Prigerson HG, et al. The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med 2009;361(16):1529-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902234 [ Links ]

7. Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, et al. Early rehabilitation after stroke: a narrative review. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2017;19(12):59. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6 [ Links ]

8. Abubakar SA, Jamoh BY. Dysphagia following acute stroke and its effect on short-term outcome. Niger Postgrad Med J 2017;24(3):182-6. DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_96_17 [ Links ]

9. Rowat A. Enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients. Br J Nurs 2015;24(3):138-40, 42-5. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.3.138 [ Links ]

10. Goldberg LS, Altman KW. The role of gastrostomy tube placement in advanced dementia with dysphagia: a critical review. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:1733-9. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S53153 [ Links ]

11. Gieniusz M, Sinvani L, Kozikowski A, Patel V, Nouryan C, Williams MS, et al. Percutaneous feeding tubes in individuals with advanced dementia: are physicians "choosing wisely"? J Am Geriatr Soc 2017. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15125 [ Links ]

12. Smith L, Ferguson R. Artificial nutrition and hydration in people with late-stage dementia. Home Healthc Now 2017;35(6):321-5. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000550 [ Links ]

13. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M, Educational and Clinical Practice Committee. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003;22(4):415-21. [ Links ]

14. Leandro-Merhi VA, Morete JL, Oliveira MR. Assessing nutritional status before introducing enteral nutrition. Arq Gastroenterol 2009;46(3):219-24. [ Links ]

15. Jain R, Maple JT, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, et al. The role of endoscopy in enteral feeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.021 [ Links ]

16. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15(6):872-5. [ Links ]

17. Jafri NS, Mahid SS, Minor KS, Idstein SR, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S. Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent peristomal infection following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25(6):647-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03247.x [ Links ]

18. D'Avila CL, Oliveira SC, Jorge JL, Neumaier MF, Ribeiro RD. Gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea: análise de 31 pacientes do Hospital Governador Celso Ramos. Arq Catarinenses Med 2008;37(4):57-63. [ Links ]

19. Fabris FM, Kikawa RK. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: review of 35 patients. Gastroenterol Endosc Dig 2010;29(2):37-41. [ Links ]

20. Hatakeyama RAE, Tobaru AAW, Lameira CNP, Vidal DG. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: review of epidemiological profile, indications and major complications in tertiary care hospital. Gastroenterol Endosc Dig 2016;35(1):15-9. [ Links ]

21. Fávaro GM, Filho TF, Coca DS, Cunha MA, Sato Uemura R, Furuya Júnior CK, et al. Endoscopic gastrostomy: critical analysis in a regional referral hospital. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2017;37(1):33-8. [ Links ]

22. Cúrdia GT, Marinho C, Magalhães J, Barbosa M, Monteiro S, Dias de Castro F, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: confirming the clinical benefits far beyond anthropometry. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;29(9):1097-101. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000923 [ Links ]

23. Landi F, Calvani R, Tosato M, Martone AM, Ortolani E, Savera G, et al. Anorexia of aging: risk factors, consequences, and potential treatments. Nutrients 2016;8(2):69. DOI: 10.3390/nu8020069 [ Links ]

24. Schwartz DB, Barrocas A, Wesley JR, Kliger G, Pontes-Arruda A, Márquez HA, et al. Gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced dementia or near end of life. Nutr Clin Pract 2014 Dec;29(6):829-40. DOI: 10.1177/0884533614546890 [ Links ]

25. Kara O, Kizilarslanoglu MC, Canbaz B, Arik G, Varan HD, Kuyumcu ME, et al. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in older adults with neurologic disorders. Nutr Clin Pract 2016;31(6):799-804. DOI: 10.1177/0884533616648132 [ Links ]

26. Lucendo AJ, Friginal-Ruiz AB. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an update on its indications, management, complications, and care. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2014;106(8):529-39. [ Links ]

27. Pars H, Çavusoglu H. A literature review of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: dealing with complications. Gastroenterol Nurs 2017. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000320 [ Links ]

28. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications, and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(24):7739-51. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739 [ Links ]

29. Jensen AR, Renaud E, Drucker NA, Staszak J, Senay A, Umesh V, et al. Why wait: early enteral feeding after pediatric gastrostomy tube placement. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53(4):656-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.015 [ Links ]

30. Szary NM, Arif M, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Enteral feeding within three after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011;5(4):e34-8. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeb732 [ Links ]

31. Stein J, Schulte-Bockholt A, Sabin M, Keymling M. A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next-day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1656-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1473-5 [ Links ]

32. Toledo DO, Piovacari SMF, Horie LM, Matos LBN, Castro MG, Ceniccola GD, et al. Campaign "Say no to malnutrition": 11 important steps to fight hospital malnutrition. BRASPEN J 2018;33(1):86-100. [ Links ]

33. Correia MITD, Perman MI, Waitzberg DL. Hospital malnutrition in Latin America: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 2017;36(4):958-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.025 [ Links ]

34. Correia MI, Hegazi RA, Higashiguchi T, Michel JP, Reddy BR, Tappenden KA, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for addressing malnutrition in health care: an updated strategy from the feedM.E. Global Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15(8):544-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.05.011 [ Links ]

35. Ljungqvist O, Van Gossum A, Sanz ML, De Man F. The European fight against malnutrition. Clin Nutr 2010;29(2):149-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.10.004 [ Links ]

36. Waitzberg DL, Caiaffa WT, Correia MI. Hospital malnutrition: the Brazilian national survey (IBRANUTRI): a study of 4000 patients. Nutrition 2001;17(7-8):573-80. [ Links ]

37. Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr 2003;22(3):235-9. [ Links ]

Appel-da-Silva MC, Zuchinali P, Fleck de Oliveira R, Boligon CS, Riella C, Salazar GS. Nutritional profile and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutr Hosp 2019;36(3):499-503.

Received: October 14, 2018; Accepted: December 07, 2018

Correspondence: Marcelo Campos Appel-da-Silva. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit-Multidisciplinary Nutrition Support Team. Hospital Mãe de Deus. Rua Jose de Alencar, 286. 90880-480 Porto Alegre, RS. Brazil e-mail: marceloappel@yahoo.com.br

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License