SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue5Association of physical activity, muscular strength, and obesity indicators with self-concept in Chilean childrenDiagnostic capacity of neck circumference to evaluate obesity in a young adult population. Data analysis from the second national health survey in Chile, 2009-2010 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

My SciELO

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Nutrición Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 1699-5198Print version ISSN 0212-1611

Nutr. Hosp. vol.39 n.5 Madrid Sep./Oct. 2022  Epub Dec 19, 2022

https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.03969 

ORIGINAL PAPERS

Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes: the PHIGNA-DM2 study

Prevalencia de la hepatopatía grasa no alcohólica (HGNA) en una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes de tipo 2: el estudio PHIGNA-DM2

Antonio J Martínez-Ortega1  , Ana Piñar-Gutiérrez1  , Carmen Lara-Romero2  , Pablo J Remón-Ruiz1  , Javier Ampuero-Herrojo2  , Irene de Lara-Rodríguez1  , Manuel Romero-Gómez2  , Pedro Pablo García-Luna1  , Alfonso Soto-Moreno1 

1Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío. Sevilla, Spain

2Department of Gastroenterology. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío. Sevilla, Spain

Abstract

Background:

type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Objective: to evaluate the prevalence of NAFLD in a cohort of patients with T2D.

Methods:

an observational, descriptive study performed between May 2018 and December 2019 at the Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit. The χ² test was performed for qualitative variables and a non-parametric test for the comparison of medians of quantitative variables. Steatosis degree was defined by the coefficient attenuated parameter (CAP): (S0: < 248 dB/m; S1: 248-268 dB/m; S2: 268-288 dB/m; S3: > 288 dB/m) or stiffness: F0-F1: < 8 kPa; F2: 8-10 kPa; F3: 10-15 kPa; F4: > 15 kPa, using transient elastography (TE) (FibroScan®). A univariate analysis was performed and subsequently a multivariate analysis with statistically significant variables used to study the predictive factors of intense steatosis and advanced fibrosis.

Results:

n = 104 patients with T2D; 84 (80.7 %) were obese. TE demonstrated advanced fibrosis in 20 % and intense steatosis (S3) in more than 50 %. Lower total bilirubin (OR: 0.028; 95 % CI: [0.002-0.337]; p = 0.005) was found to be an independent factor for S3 steatosis in the multivariate analysis. BMI (OR: 1.497; 95 % CI: [1.102-2.034]; p = 0.01) was a predictive factor for advanced fibrosis in a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

NAFLD-associated intense steatosis and NAFLD-associated fibrosis were commonly found in patients with T2DM and obesity. Diabetic patients should be screened for liver disease as one more target organ.

Keywords: Type 2 diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Liver fibrosis; Liver steatosis; Elastography; Risk factor

Resumen

Antecedentes:

la diabetes de tipo 2 (DM2) es un factor de riesgo para la enfermedad del hígado graso no alcohólico (EHGNA).

Objetivo:

evaluar la prevalencia de la EHGNA en una cohorte de pacientes con DM2.

Métodos:

estudio descriptivo observacional realizado entre mayo de 2018 y diciembre de 2019 en la Unidad de Endocrinología y Nutrición. Se realizó una prueba de χ² para las variables cualitativas y una prueba no paramétrica para la comparación de medianas de variables cuantitativas. El grado de esteatosis se definió mediante el parámetro coeficiente atenuado (CAP): (S0: < 248 dB/m; S1: 248-288 dB/m; S2: 268-288 dB/m; S3: > 288 dB/m) o rigidez: F0-F1: < 8 kPa; F2: 8-10 kPa; F3: 10-15 kPa; F4: > 15 kPa, usando la elastografía transitoria (TE) (FibroScan®). Se realizó un análisis univariante y posteriormente un análisis multivariante con las variables estadísticamente significativas para estudiar los factores predictivos de esteatosis intensa y fibrosis avanzada.

Resultados:

n = 104 pacientes con DM2; 84 (80,7 %) eran obesos. La TE demostró fibrosis avanzada en el 20 % y esteatosis intensa (S3) en más del 50 %. Los niveles disminuidos de bilirrubina total (OR: 0.028; 95 % CI: (0.002-0.337); p = 0.005) se encontraron como factores independientes para la esteatosis S3 en el analisis multivariable. El IMC (OR: 1.497; 95 % CI: (1.102-2.034); p = 0.01) fue un factor predictivo de fibrosis avanzada.

Conclusiones:

la esteatosis intensa asociada a EHGNA y la fibrosis asociada a EHGNA se encontraron comúnmente en pacientes con DM2 y obesidad. Los pacientes diabéticos deben someterse a pruebas de detección de enfermedad hepática como un órgano diana más.

Palabras clave: Diabetes de tipo 2; Diabetes mellitus; Enfermedad de hígado graso no alcohólico; Fibrosis hepática; Esteatosis hepática; Elastografía

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in Western countries, and it is estimated that in 2030 it will be the most common indication for liver transplant (1). It is currently the cause of liver transplantation after hepatocellular carcinoma (2). NAFLD is more common in men, with an estimated prevalence of 30-40 % compared to 15-20 % in women (3). These incidences are challenging to measure due to the difficulty of having an accurate diagnosis, although data obtained show an incidence of 20/10000 people/year, with a peak in the sixth decade of life (4). Risk factors for NAFLD are age > 50 years, obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, elevated ferritin levels, and polymorphism in the PNPLA35-7 gene (5-7).

This disease has been linked to other diseases, especially type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, but also sleep apnea, colorectal cancer, osteoporosis, psoriasis and other endocrinopathies such as metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome, Cushing’s syndrome, and acromegaly (8). Mortality in these patients increases by 57 % and is usually due to cardiovascular disease or complications of liver disease (9). It is estimated that 30-40 % of people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease develop NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) (10), which increases the risk of liver disease-related mortality by 5- or 10-fold (9) depending on fibrosis degree. Since 40-50 % of patients with NASH develop liver fibrosis (10), this is the highest predictor of death from all causes and specially of liver disease in patients with NASH (11). FibroScan® is a method that has been used to assess the degree of liver steatosis and fibrosis in a non-invasive way. It has been proven to be accurate and accessible to measure liver tissue stiffness and consists of an ultrasound technique based on elastography which measures the speed propagation of low-frequency ultrasonic waves through the liver. This technique has also been proven to be useful for estimating the prognosis of patients with NAFLD (12). NAFLD does not cause signs or symptoms until advanced stages and may not alter the values of liver enzymes in blood.

Especially relevant is the relationship of this disease with type 2 diabetes, where the prevalence of NAFLD is higher than 70 % in some studies (13). Furthermore, NAFLD doubles the risk of diabetes incidence (8). In a study carried out in Italy it was found that people with diabetes have a three times higher risk of dying from chronic liver disease, mostly from non-viral or non-alcohol-related diseases, presumably from NAFLD (14). Currently, it is not clear whether type 2 diabetes and/or obesity are risk factors for this liver disease or if the pathological mechanisms involved are similar. Both are risk factors for developing cellular hepatocarcinoma (15-19).

The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of NAFLD in a sample of patients with DM2 using FibroScan® to correlate these results with those of diagnostic screening tools, and to determine predictive factors for advanced steatosis and fibrosis in this sample.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

STUDY DESIGN AND POPULATION

An observational and descriptive study was carried out. The patients were recruited consecutively between May 2018 and December 2019 at the clinics of the Endocrinology and Nutrition Services of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital.

Inclusion criteria were: patients over 18 years of age capable of signing an informed consent, with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes at least in the previous three months, and under monotherapy or combination treatment for diabetes.

Exclusion criteria included: patients with refusal of informed consent; type 1 diabetes; personal history of alcoholism defined according to WHO criteria (daily alcohol intake greater than 50 g in women and 70 g in men); personal history of hepatitis B, C, or autoimmune; personal history of malignancy (excluding cutaneous basal cell carcinoma) in the previous 5 years; personal history of liver surgery for any cause, personal history of use of potentially hepatotoxic treatments in the previous three months; personal history of Gilbert, Rotor, or Crigler-Najjar syndrome; a personal history of HIV infection; personal history of liver transplantation; any condition that could pose an unacceptable risk for the patient’s participation in the study at the discretion of the investigator.

SAMPLE SIZE

A target population (N) of 2000 patients was assumed, with a margin of error D of 5 % and a Z-value of 1.96 (corresponding to a confidence level of 95 %), accepting a prevalence of NAFLD of 30 % and of NASH of 5 % (1-5). Assuming 20 % potential losses, the number of patients to be enrolled was n = 334 for NAFLD and 85 for NASH.

VARIABLES

Once patients agreed to participate in the study, they underwent a routine analysis and an elastographic assessment with FibroScan®. The parameters measured in the analysis were: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, GOT/AST, GPT/ALT, GGT, total bilirubin, platelets, and albumin. With these parameters the following indices were calculated: HSI (hepatic steatosis index), FIB-4 (liver fibrosis index), NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score) and Hepamet Fibrosis Score (HFS). The HSI index was calculated with the formula [8 x (GPT/ALT / GOT/AST) + BMI], to which two points were added if the patient had type 2 diabetes and also two points if the patient was female, considering a result < 30 as low risk, a result between 30 and 36 as intermediate-risk and a result > 36 as high risk. The FIB-4 index was calculated with the formula [age (years) x GOT/AST (IU/L)] / [Platelets (109/L) x √GPT/ALT (IU/L)], considering as low-risk a result < 1.3, intermediate risk a result between 1.3 and 2.67, and high risk a result > 2.67. The NFS index was calculated with the formula [-1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m2) + 1.13 x altered glucose/diabetes (1 = Yes, 0 = No) + 0.99 x (GOT/AST / GPT/ALT ) - 0.013 x platelets (109/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)], considering a result of < -1.455 as low risk, a result between -1.455 and 0.676 as intermediate risk, and a result > 0.676 as high risk. The Hepamet Fibrosis Score was calculated using the online application freely available at https://www.hepamet-fibrosis-score.eu, considering < 0.12 as low risk, results from 0.12 to 0.47 as intermediate risk, and results above 0.47 as high risk. Steatosis by the coefficient attenuated parameter (CAP) was measured using FibroScan® as S0 (< 248 dB/m); S1 (248-267 dB/m); S2 (268-280 dB/m) and S3 (> 280 dB/m). Fibrosis was measured using FibroScan® as F0-F1: < 8 kPa; F2: 8-10 kPa; F3: 10-15 kPa; F4: > 15 kPa. Advanced fibrosis was considered when > 10 kPa (F3-F4).

Other variables collected were: date of birth, sex, weight, height, BMI, degree of obesity, presence of arterial hypertension, use of antihypertensive drugs, presence of dyslipidemia, use of lipid-lowering drugs, history of smoking, the presence of a family history of early cardiovascular disease, the presence of established cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease and/or cerebrovascular events), the time of evolution of diabetes (in years), the type of antidiabetic drugs used and the presence of diabetic microvascular complications (diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy and diabetic neuropathy).

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital

DATA ANALYSIS

The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®), version 25 for Windows (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). A descriptive analysis was performed, obtaining the median and quartiles for quantitative variables (expressed as P50 [P25-P75]) and frequency for qualitative variables (expressed as n [%]), both in the total sample and in the subgroups with and without intense steatosis. A χ² test was performed for qualitative variables and a non-parametric test for the comparison of medians of quantitative variables for the comparison between both groups. A univariate analysis was performed and subsequently a multivariate analysis with the statistically significant variables to study the predictive factors of intense steatosis and advanced fibrosis. Results of the univariate and multivariate analysis were expressed as odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence interval [CI]). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

A sample of 104 patients was included in the study; 59 (56.7 %) patients were male and the median age was 59 years, with a median time of diabetes evolution of 9 (4-15.75) years. The median glycemic control by HbA1 was 7.3 % (6.47-8.52); 17.5 % of patients presented microvascular complications; 51 (49 %) patients used oral antidiabetic treatment, and 50 % used insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs, while the remaining 1 % used only basal-bolus insulin therapy. Other baseline characteristics are described in table I.

Table I. Baseline characteristics. 

LIVER STUDY RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the results for risk of fibrosis according to FIB-4, NFS, and HFS. The NFS and HFS indices could only be calculated in 67 patients due to lack of albumin values in 48 patients.

Figure 1. Comparison of fibrosis risk according to the FIB-4, NFS and HFS indices. 

The results of steatosis risk according to the HSI index were 2.9 % low risk, 3.9 % intermediate risk, and 93.2 % high risk. Transient elastography using FibroScan® was carried out in all patients: F0-F1: 64.65 %, F2: 15.15 %, F3: 11.11 %, F4: 9.09 %. Regarding steatosis results, 24.24 % of patients had S1 degree, 17.17 % had S2 degree, and 58.59 % had S3 degree.

When evaluating noninvasive scores as predictors of intense steatosis only HSI was statistically significant in the univariate analysis (OR: 1.099; 95 % CI: (1.045-1.156); p = 0.000)

PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF INTENSE STEATOSIS AND ADVANCED FIBROSIS

When comparing the results of non-intense (S1-S2) and intense steatosis (S3) groups we found that in the S3 group patients had a higher BMI (38.63 vs 32.67 kg/m2; p = 0.003), higher levels of total cholesterol (170 vs 152.5 mg/dL; p = 0.036) and lower total bilirubin (0.35 vs 0.45 mg/dL; p = 0.045). None of the variables related to diabetes (time of evolution, HbA1c, microvascular complications or type of treatment) showed significant differences between both groups.

When performing a logistic regression analysis of factors related to S3 steatosis we found statistical significance in the univariate analysis for BMI, total cholesterol, total bilirrubin, and HSI score, but only lower total bilirubin (OR: 0.028; 95 % CI: [0.002-0.337]; p = 0.005) was found to be an independent factor for S3 steatosis in the multivariate analysis.

Table II shows the only variables that obtained statistical significance in the univariate analysis concerning the presence of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4). The following variables obtained statistical significance: sex (male), BMI, age, GOT/AST, GGT, and a high result obtained when calculating the HSI index. All of them except age were shown to be risk factors. When performing the multivariate analysis with these variables, only BMI (OR: 1.497; 95 % CI: (1.102-2.034); p = 0.01) maintained its statistical significance.

Table II. Association between presence of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) in FibroScan® and the characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. 

None of the other indices (FIB-4, NFS, HFS) obtained statistical significance in the univariate analysis when evaluating the risk of advanced liver fibrosis. We did not found statistical significance in the univariate or multivariate analysis of liver fibrosis and steatosis regarding control-of-diabetes parameters such as HbA1c and time of disease evolution (Table III).

Table III. Association between control and time of evolution of type 2 diabetes and intense hepatic steatosis and advanced hepatic fibrosis in the univariate analysis. 

DISCUSSION

The results obtained are comparable to similar relevant studies carried out in Asian countries where the presence of NAFLD has been evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes. The most important are those carried out by Kwok et al. (20) (Hong Kong), Lee Lai et al. (21) (Malaysia) and Tuong et al. (22) (Vietnam). Although these studies were carried out in an Asian population, the mean BMIs obtained were 28.2 kg/m2, 26.6 kg/m² and 24.9 kg/m2, respectively, showing a trend towards westernization of these countries over the last years, which allows comparison with our study. Despite this, in these studies the prevalence of steatosis was 72.8 %, 72.4 % and 73.3 %, respectively, while it was 100 % in our study. This could be explained by the BMI of our sample where the median value was 34.45 kg/m2. In the study carried out by Kwok et al. (20), the prevalence of liver steatosis measured by FibroScan® increased to 94.6 % if only the patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 are taken into account. On the other hand, in the study carried out by Lai et al. (21), the prevalence of steatosis also increased if only obese patients were taken into account (89.1 %). Finally, in the study carried out by Tuong et al. in Vietnam, 100 % of obese patients had steatosis. Regarding the prevalence of advanced fibrosis (grades F3-F4, ≥ 9.5 kPa), in these studies this prevalence was 17.1 %, 21 % and 9.5 %, respectively, similar to ours (20.2 %).

Another interesting point of our work is the use of the HSI, HFS, NFS and FIB-4 scores and their comparison with the results obtained in the liver study using FibroScan®. The interpretation of the results obtained regarding the NFS and HFS scores is limited by the low percentage of patients for whom the calculation could be performed. This happened because albumin is not routinely determined in our center. The importance of this datum lies in the fact that the use of these scores in daily clinical practice may be limited for the same reason. As in the study by Singh et al. (23), There was great variability in the percentage of patients who were estimated to be at high risk for advanced fibrosis with the NFS and FIB-4 scores.

The HSI index is a predictor of steatosis. While the proportion of high-risk results according to the HSI index was 93.86 %, the proportion of S3 steatosis was 58.59 %. We do consider that it was more effective in ruling out steatosis since 2.63 % of patients obtained a low-risk result according to the HSI index compared to 0 % of patients who did not present any degree of steatosis in the study with FibroScan®. The HSI high-risk results can be explained by the formula itself since it takes into account the BMI (whose median in our study was 34.45 kg/m2) and the presence of diabetes mellitus (which increases the result by 2 points). For this reason, in other studies, it has been considered that in presence of diabetes the HSI index makes poor discrimination on the risk of hepatic steatosis and overestimates it. Furthermore, it was not considered as a valid index in a study where liver steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes measured by H-MR spectroscopy was compared with the results of the HSI (24).

On the other hand, the NFS and FIB-4 scores are predictors of fibrosis. Studies carried out to evaluate the role of these two scores have yielded results in favor of a good capability to diagnose advanced fibrosis by FIB-4 and in favor of ruling out advanced fibrosis in the case of a value < 1.455 in NFS (25). In our study, the NFS score overestimated the prevalence of fibrosis, since only 10.45 % obtained a value < -1.455, while the proportion of patients who obtained a F0-F1 degree of fibrosis with FibroScan® was 64.65 %. The results in terms of advanced fibrosis were more consistent since 24 % of patients obtained a high-risk result and 20.2 % of patients had advanced fibrosis with FibroScan®. However, FibroScan® could be performed only in 99 patients and not in the entire sample, so there could be a limitation in its interpretation. Regarding the FIB-4 score, the results were more similar to those obtained by FibroScan® to rule out liver fibrosis (low-risk estimated of 76.32 % by FIB-4 similar to 79.8 % of F0-F2). This is consistent with a similar study carried out in Italy (26) in which different scores for estimating the risk of liver fibrosis were compared. In it, FIB-4 was considered the best marker to avoid unnecessary referral to hepatologists. In our study, FIB-4 also underestimated the proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis (high-risk estimated of 1,75 %).

Predictive factors for intense steatosis in multivariate analysis were total cholesterol and a lower level of total bilirubin. Several studies have shown that bilirubin has an inverse association with cardiovascular disease, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes (27-29), probably due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic role (28). An inverse association between an elevated bilirubin level and the risk of this NAFLD in the general healthy Caucasian population has also been reported, although this association was observed in observational studies with low statistical power (30).

Bilirubin is produced as a consequence of red cells degradation by the enzyme heme-oxygenase in the spleen. This enzyme has two forms, one of them inducible (HO-1). The increase in this enzyme and therefore in bilirubin levels increases the expression of PPARα, a transcription factor that promotes the utilization and catabolism of fatty acids. When this decreases, there is an increase in hepatic steatosis. In obese mice it has been shown that the increase in bilirubin decreases the expression of PPARα and thus the adiposity of the animals. Furthermore, a lower level of PPARα (31) has also been found in animal models with fatty liver. Another hormone that raises HO-1 through increased bilirubin levels is FGF21, which improves insulin sensitivity and reduces liver steatoasis. This is why mice with fatty liver secondary to obesity have been treated with bilirubin nanoparticles, thereby reducing steatosis and improving liver function. Other treatment routes include an HO-1-inducing diet with epoxyeicosatriene acid and physical exercise, with which bilirubin levels are used (32).

Cholesterol, especially for that coming from the diet, has shown an increased risk of liver disease because it produces a state of inflammation and hypoxia when it is accumulated in liver tissue (33). Furthermore, hypercholesterolemia produces a state of insulin resistance, related to NAFLD (33). Regarding advanced fibrosis, in the multivariate analysis, the predictive factors were BMI and a lower HSI index result. Regarding the HSI, it should be noted that this index was created as a predictor of steatosis, not fibrosis, and it can also overestimate the risk in patients with type 2 diabetes due to the formula itself.

GPT / ALT level was not a statistically significant predictor for either steatosis or fibrosis. It was statistically significant in the three studies similar to ours as mentioned previously (21-23), but it has been shown that transaminase levels should not be used to perform NAFLD screening since they can be normal, especially with a cut-off value of 30 U/L (34). Its usefulness lies in the fact that its elevation can serve to prompt clinical suspicion of this disease (35,36). Although the levels of GOP/AST and GGT were not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis, they were statistically significant for an increased risk of advanced fibrosis, which concur with the current evidence. In fact, in a study carried out in 2012 in the United Kingdom (37) it was found that patients with diabetes and NAFLD presented higher levels of GOT/AST and GGT, the latter being the most altered parameter in patients with diabetes in various studies (38). Platelets were not a statistically significant predictor either for intense steatosis (p = 0.062) or for advanced fibrosis (p = 0.5) since hypersplenism with sequestration and destruction of platelets occurs in cases of advanced cirrhosis with portal hypertension (39).

Likewise, it is worth highlighting the importance of the results in terms of the control and time of evolution of diabetes, since these two variables have not been demonstrated to be a risk factor for intense hepatic steatosis or advanced hepatic fibrosis. This means that any patient with type 2 diabetes has a high risk of suffering from fatty liver disease regardless control or time of evolution. This data is highly relevant when planning screening programs for these patients.

The limitations of our work lie in: 1) the patients were recruited in clinics where the prevalence of obesity is higher than in the general population, especially in Nutrition consultations; 2) a liver biopsy was not performed to verify the real prevalence of NAFLD, although the FibroScan® has shown to be accurate for measuring both steatosis and liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD when compared with the histological evaluation (90 % sensitivity and specificity) (40). The sample size was smaller than that calculated, despite which the results did reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, up to 35.5 % of asymptomatic patients had liver fibrosis, this being severe to very severe in 20.2 % of cases. On the other hand, 100 % presented with some degree of steatosis and about 59 % exhibited S3 degree. The HSI score appears to overestimate the risk of intense steatosis. The NFS score appears to overestimate the risk of liver fibrosis while FIB-4 seems to underestimate the risk of advanced liver fibrosis. In the multivariate analysis, total cholesterol and a lower total bilirubin level were predictors of intense S3 hepatic steatosis. BMI and HSI were predictive for advanced fibrosis. Neither control of diabetes nor time of evolution were predictors for either intense steatosis or advanced fibrosis, which is relevant for planning screening programs. NAFLD is a common and potentially serious entity that may need to be included in the screening for complications in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Larger population studies in non-obese type 2 diabetes patients are needed to confirm our findings.

Acknowledgments:

we thank the Menarini Group for their support in this investigation.

REFERENCES

1. Byrne C, Targher G. NAFLD: A multisystem disease. Journal of Hepatology 2015;62:S47-S64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012 [ Links ]

2. Wong RJ, Cheung R, Ahmed A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the US. Hepatology 2014;59:2188-95. DOI: 10.1002/hep.26986 [ Links ]

3. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology 2004;40:1387-95. DOI: 10.1002/hep.20466 [ Links ]

4. Tsuneto A, Hida A, Sera N, Imaizumi M, Ichimaru S, Nakashima E, et al. Fatty liver incidence and predictive variables. Hypertens Res 2010;33:638-43. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.45 [ Links ]

5. Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, Pertsemlidis A, Cox D, Pennacchio LA, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet 2008;40:1461-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng.257 [ Links ]

6. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10:330-44. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41 [ Links ]

7. Hyysalo J, Mannisto VT, Zhou Y, Arola J, Karja V, Leivonen M, et al. A population-based study on the prevalence of NASH using scores validated against liver histology. J Hepatol 2013;60:839-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.009 [ Links ]

8. Musso G, Cassader M, Olivetti C, Rosina F, Carbone G, Gambino R. Association of obstructive sleep apnoea with the presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2013;14:417-31. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12020 [ Links ]

9. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med 2011;43:617-49. DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2010.518623 [ Links ]

10. Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, Thorelius L, Holmqvist M, Bodemar G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology 2006;44:865-73. DOI: 10.1002/hep.21327 [ Links ]

11. Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stal P, Kechagias S, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 2014;61(5):1547-54. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27368 [ Links ]

12. Boursier J, Vergniol J, Guillet A, Hiriart JB, Lannes A, Le Bail B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of blood fibrosis tests and liver stiffness measurement by FibroScan® in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016;65:570-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.023 [ Links ]

13. Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla DC, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe:a review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol 2013;58:593-608. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.005 [ Links ]

14. Zoppini G, Fedeli U, Gennaro N, Saugo M, Targher G, Bonora E. Mortality from chronic liver diseases in diabetes. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1020-5. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.132 [ Links ]

15. de Marco R, Locatelli F, Zoppini G, Verlato G, Bonora E, Muggeo M. Causespecific mortality in type 2 diabetes. The Verona Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1999;22:756-61. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.756 [ Links ]

16. Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 2004;24:3-20. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-823098 [ Links ]

17. Ertle J, Dechene A, Sowa JP, Penndorf V, Herzer K, Kaiser G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progresses to hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of apparent cirrhosis. Int J Cancer 2011;128:2436-43. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25797 [ Links ]

18. Stickel F, Hellerbrand C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms and implications. Gut 2010;59:1303-7. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.199661 [ Links ]

19. Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology 2010;51:1820-32. DOI: 10.1002/hep.23594 [ Links ]

20. Kwok R, Choi KC, Wong GL, Zhang Y, Chan HL, Luk AO, et al. Screening diabetic patients for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurements: A prospective cohort study. Gut 2015;65:1359-68. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309265 [ Links ]

21. Lai LL, Wan Yusoff WNI, Vethakkan SR, Nik Mustapha NR, Mahadeva S, Chan WK. Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using transient elastography. J Hepatol 2019;34:1396-403. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14577 [ Links ]

22. Tuong T, Tran D, Phu P, Hong T, Dinh T, Chu D. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis and Steatosis Using FibroScan®. Diagnostics 2020;10:159. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030159 [ Links ]

23. Singh A, Le P, Peerzada MM, Lopez R, Alkhouri N. The Utility of Noninvasive Scores in Assessing the Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Advanced Fibrosis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018;52(3):268-72. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000905 [ Links ]

24. Guiu B, Girod-Crevisy E, Binquet C, Duvillard L, Masson D, Lepage C, et al. Prediction for steatosis in type-2 diabetes: clinic-biological markers versus H-MR spectroscopy. Eur Radiol 2012;22:855-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2326-9 [ Links ]

25. Vilar-Gomez, Chalasani N. Non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: clinical prediction rules and blood-based biomarkers. Journal of Hepatology 2018;68:305-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.013 [ Links ]

26. Ciardullo S, Muraca E, Perra S, Bianconi E, Zerbini F, Oltolini A, et al. Screening for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes using non-invasive scores and association with diabetic complications. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020;8(1):e000904. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000904 [ Links ]

27. Kunustor SK, Bakker SK, Gansevoort RT, Chowdhury R, Dulaart RP. Circulating total bilirubin and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the general population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015;35(3):716-24. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304929 [ Links ]

28. Kunustor SK, Kieneker LM, Burgess S, Bakker SJL, Dullaart RPF. Circulating total bilirubin and future risk of hypertension in the general population: the prevention of renal and vascular end-stage disease (PREVEND) prospective study and a mendelian randomization approach. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6(11):e006503. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006503 [ Links ]

29. Nano J, Muka T, Cepeda M, Voortman T, Dhana K, Brahimaj A, et al. Association of circulating total bilirubin with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence. Diabetes Metab 2016;42(6):389-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.06.002 [ Links ]

30. Kunutsor S, Frysz M, Verweij N, Kieneker L, Bakker SJL, Dullaart RPF. Circulating total bilirubin and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the PREVEND study; observational findings and a Mendelian randomization study. European Journal of Epidemiology 2020;35:123-37. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00589-0 [ Links ]

31. Hinds TD Jr, Adeosun SO, Alamodi AA, Stec DE. Does bilirubin prevent hepatic steatosis through activation of the PPARα nuclear receptor? Med Hypotheses 2016;95:54-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.08.013 [ Links ]

32. Stec DE, Hinds TD Jr. Natural Product Heme Oxygenase Inducers as Treatment for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(24):9493. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21249493 [ Links ]

33. Tirosh O. Hypocix signaling and cholesterol lipotoxicity in fatty liver disease progression. Oxidative Medicina and Cellular Longevity 2018;2018:2548154. DOI: 10.1155/2018/25481.54 [ Links ]

34. Wong VW, Wong GL, Tsang SW, Hui AY, Chan AW, Choi PC, et al. Metabolic and histological features of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with different serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:387-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03896.x [ Links ]

35. Loo SY, Chan WK. Emerging new standard for non-invasive assessment of liver disease mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017;6:135-7. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.03.06 [ Links ]

36. Chan WK, Treeprasertsuk S, Imajo K, Nakajima A, Seki Y, Kasama K, et al. Clinical features and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseacross the Asia Pacific region-the GO ASIA initiative. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:816-25. DOI: 10.1111/apt.14506 [ Links ]

37. Armstrong MJ, Houlihan DD, Bentham L, Shaw JC, Cramb R, Olliff S, et al. Presence of severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a large prospective primary care cohort. J Hepatol 2012;56:234-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.03.020 [ Links ]

38. Mathur S, Mehta DK, Kapoor S, Yadav S. Liver function in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Int J Sci Stud 2016;3:43-7. DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2016/09 [ Links ]

39. Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, Peerlinck K. Review article: Blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharm Ther 2008;27:1017-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03674.x [ Links ]

40. Eddowes P, Sasso M, Allison M, Tsochatzis E, Anstee Q, Sheridan D, et al. Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1717-30. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042 [ Links ]

Funding:this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Informed consent statement:informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Institutional review board statement:the study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Virgen del Rocío Universitary Hospital.

Martínez-Ortega AJ, Piñar-Gutiérrez A, Lara-Romero C, Remón-Ruiz PJ, Ampuero Herrojo J, de Lara Rodríguez I, Romero-Gómez M, García-Luna PP, Soto-Moreno A. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes: the PHIGNA-DM2 study. Nutr Hosp 2022;39(5):1012-1018

Received: November 29, 2021; Accepted: June 15, 2022

Correspondence: Pedro Pablo García-Luna. Nutrition Unit. Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío. Av. Manuel Siurot, s/n. CP 41013 Sevilla, Spain e-mail address: garcialunapp@yahoo.es

Conflicts of interest:

the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License