SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.110 issue2Liver-kidney simultaneous transplantation in adult patients with primary hyperoxaluria. Experience at Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubrePrognostic factors of liver cirrhosis mortality after a first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. A multicenter study author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

My SciELO

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

Print version ISSN 1130-0108

Rev. esp. enferm. dig. vol.110 n.2 Madrid Feb. 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.17235/reed.2017.4872/2017 

ORIGINAL PAPERS

High short-term rebleeding rate in patients undergoing a second endoscopic therapy for small-bowel angioectasias after recurrent bleeding

Ana Ponte1  , Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles2  , Rolando Pinho1  , Adélia Rodrigues1  , Pilar Esteban-Delgado2  , Joana Silva1  , Jaime Rodrigues1  , João Carvalho1  , Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Martínez2 

1Department of Gastroenterology. Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho. Gaia, Portugal

2Small Bowel Unit. Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer. Murcia, Spain

ABSTRACT

Background:

Angioectasias represents the most frequently found lesion in the small bowel by device-assisted enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in Western countries. Recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding after angioectasias therapy remains unclear and data regarding the efficacy of additional endoscopic therapeutic sessions to reduce the rebleeding rate is limited.

Aim:

To evaluate the rebleeding rate in small bowel angioectasias after a second endoscopic treatment with balloon-assisted enteroscopy after an initial bleed during the first endoscopic treatment.

Methods:

A retrospective double-center study of patients with small-bowel angioectasias undergoing a second enteroscopy treatment due to a first rebleeding episode. The endpoint was rebleeding, defined as the need for a blood transfusion, the presence of overt bleeding or a decrease in hemoglobin ≥ 2 g/dL.

Results:

Fifteen of 37 (40.5%) patients with small-bowel angioectasias that underwent a second endoscopic therapy after a first rebleeding episode (n = 15) experienced a second rebleeding episode. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that most rebleeding episodes occurred within the first 12 months of follow-up, resulting in a rebleeding rate of 33.1% at 6 months, 39.1% at 12 months and 52.6% at 24 months.

Conclusions:

Despite the high absolute short-term rebleeding rate, further endoscopic treatments may be beneficial due to the effective reduction of rebleeding in a subset of patients.

Key words: Device; assisted enteroscopy; Small-bowel vascular lesions; Angioectasias

INTRODUCTION

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) represents approximately 5% of all gastrointestinal bleeding episodes and is defined as a bleed of unknown origin that persists or recurs after an initial negative evaluation including esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy 1) (2) (3. Previous studies have shown that the source of the bleed responsible for OGIB is usually located in the small bowel 2) (1) (4. Possible small bowel etiologies of OGIB include angioectasias, erosions and ulcers secondary to Crohn's disease or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, polyps, tumors, Meckel's diverticulum, varices and Dieulafoy's lesions 5) (6) (7) (8. In Western countries, angioectasias represents the most frequent lesion found during device assisted-enteroscopy (DAE) in patients with OGIB, which is the main indication for this technique 6) (9) (10) (11) (12).(3) (6) (8 Moreover, the rebleeding rate in OGIB is significantly higher in patients with small bowel vascular lesions compared to other small bowel lesions 9) (10. Even though the development of capsule endoscopy (CE) and DAE has led to an increased knowledge of angioectasias located in the small bowel, little is known about the efficacy endoscopic treatment in these lesions 9) (10) (13) (14. The global rebleeding rate of small bowel vascular lesions (SBVL) after one endoscopic therapeutic session with DAE is 40% 9. The current data with regard to the efficacy of further endoscopic therapy for the reduction of the rebleeding rate of previously treated SBVL is limited 15. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rebleeding rate of angioectasias after a second endoscopic treatment with balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in patients that experienced a rebleeding episode after the first endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

Patients

Patients who underwent a second DAE for endoscopic therapy of small bowel angioectasias between May 2005 and August 2015 at the Gastroenterology departments of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho (CHVNG/E) and Morales Meseguer Hospital (MMH) were identified from a prospective database. Patients were included in the study if they had an angioectasias associated rebleeding episode after a first endoscopic treatment and underwent a second endoscopic therapy with BAE. Exclusion criteria included any patient less than 18 years, pregnant women, a lack of informed consent and/or the presence of concomitant gastrointestinal lesions which explained the gastrointestinal bleed.

The medical history of patients was reviewed and data with regard to demographics, past medical and surgical history, medications and characteristics of the first rebleeding episode of SBVL were extracted. Moreover, information with regard to the first and second BAE and other diagnostic and therapeutic approaches after the first BAE was also collected. Patients were followed-up until a recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding after a second endoscopic therapy session or until the end of the follow up period defined as August 2015. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee.

Enteroscopy procedures

The standard push and pull technique was used in all procedures at both centers. A single-balloon enteroscope (SIF-Q180, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used in procedures performed at the CHVNG/E and a double-balloon enteroscope (EN-450T5, EN-450P5 and EN-580T; Fujinon Inc., Saitama, Japan) was used at MMH. These enteroscopes were 200 cm long and had working channels ranging from 2.2 to 3.2 mm that enabled the use of most diagnostic and therapeutic accessories.

An overnight fast was required for antegrade procedures and bowel preparation with 4 L of polyethylene glycol solution the day before the procedure was required for retrograde BAE. Patients underwent deep propofol sedation and were positioned in the left lateral decubitus. All procedures were performed without fluoroscopic control by endoscopists with a wide experience in DAE (RP with AR at CHVNG/E and EPCM at MMH).

Procedural data and events were collected in a prospective database at both the CHVNG/E and MMH. All enteroscopy reports and their respective iconography data were reviewed by the authors (AP, RP, EPCR and EPCM). Angioectasias found and treated during all BAE procedures were classified according to the Yamamoto classification 16. A long hospitalization period (> 5 days), acute pancreatitis, bleeding with a requirement of a blood transfusion or perforation were defined as major adverse events. Enteroscopy-related variables including the type of BAE used, the depth and route of insertion, the endoscopic findings, therapeutic procedures and possible complications were recorded.

Hemostatic therapies

Conventional argon plasma coagulation (APC) probes that are traditionally used for colonoscopy were used at both centers. The APC 300/ICC 200 (ERBE Elektromedizin, Tübingen, Germany) with an argon flow rate set at 1.0-1.2 l/min and a power output at 20-40 W was used at both centers. Submucosal adrenaline (1/10000) injection (either for lifting or hemostasis) and conventional hemostatic clips (Resolution Clip, Boston Scientific) were used whenever appropriate.

Outcome

The outcome was defined as the recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding after a second endoscopic therapy session, which included the following: a) the need for a blood transfusion; b) the presence of overt bleeding (melena, hematemesis or hematochezia); and c) a decrease in hemoglobin of greater than 2 g/dL, after the exclusion of all other causes of anemia, as reported previously 10.3 The first rebleeding episode was defined in the same manner.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive results are presented as percentages, medians and interquartile range (IQR). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the non-bleeding time which was defined as the time from the second endoscopic treatment and the recurrence of a SBVL bleed, as previously described. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for data entry and data analysis.

RESULTS

Patients and clinical characteristics

Thirty-seven patients underwent a second endoscopic treatment with BAE after experiencing a rebleed of angioectasias despite a first endoscopic treatment between May 2005 and August 2015. Most patients were male (67.7%; n = 25) with a median age of 70 years (IQR 66 -75). Twenty-two of 37 (59.5%) patients had cardiac disease, 9/37 (24.3%) had aortic valve stenosis, 10/37 (27%) had chronic renal disease and 6/37 (16.2%) had chronic liver disease (Table 1). Almost half of the patients (45.9%) were taking antiplatelet drugs and 11/37 (29.7%) were anticoagulated.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with angioectasias that underwent endoscopic treatment with balloon-assisted enteroscopy 

ASA: acetylsalicylic acid; IQR: interquartile range; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OGIB: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Rebleeding after the first endoscopic session manifested as a drop in the hemoglobin level of > 2 g/dL in 18/37 (48.6%) patients, the need for a blood transfusion in 11/37 (29.7%) patients (with or without a hemoglobin drop of > 2 g/dL) and as overt bleeding (with or without a hemoglobin drop) and/or the need for a blood transfusion in the remaining 8/37 (21.6%) patients. In addition to the DAE for the investigation of the rebleeding event, 12/37 (32.4%) patients underwent upper endoscopy, 3/37 (8.1%) patients underwent colonoscopy and 12/37 (32.4%) patients had a repeat CE.

Deep enteroscopy procedures

First device assisted-enteroscopy

The first DAE was usually performed via an oral approach in 29/37 (78.4%) patients (Table 2). The majority of angioectasias identified (51.4%; n = 19) were classified as type 1a according to the Yamamoto's Classification 16. Moreover, these lesions were more commonly located in the jejunum (43.2%; n = 16), with a median of 4 (IQR 1.5-8.5) angioectasias per examination. APC was performed in all cases, either as a single hemostatic modality in 83.8% (n = 31) of the procedures or combined with a clip or adrenaline in the remaining six procedures.

Second device-assisted enteroscopy

The oral approach was used in 30/37 (81.1%) cases and 7 (18.9%) underwent a complete examination (Table 2). Angioectasias Type 1b according to the Yamamoto Classification 16 were identified in 54.1% (n = 20) of procedures. These lesions were mainly located in the jejunum (48.6%; n = 18) and multiple lesions were frequently found, with a median of 3.0 (IQR 1.0-5.0) angioectasias per examination. APC was employed as a single therapy in 81.1% (n = 30) of procedures and complemented with clips and/or adrenaline in the remaining 18.9% (n = 7) of procedures. There were no reported minor or major complications during or after the procedure.

Table 2 Characteristics of the two balloon-assisted enteroscopy procedures performed in patients with small-bowel angioectasias 

APC: argon plasma coagulation; IQR: interquartile range; SBVL: small bowel vascular lesions.

Rebleeding

Fifteen of the 37 patients (40.5%) that underwent a second endoscopic therapy experienced rebleeding. Rebleeding occurred as an overt gastrointestinal bleed in 7 (43.8%) patients, as a decrease of greater than 2 g/dL in the hemoglobin level in 5 (31.3%) cases and as the need for a blood transfusion in 3 (18.8%) cases. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis (Fig. 1) showed that the majority of the rebleeding episodes occurred within the first 12 months of follow-up, resulting in a rebleed rate of 33.1% at 6 months, 39.1% at 12 months and 52.6% at 24 months.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier curve depicting rebleeding during follow-up. The majority of the rebleeding episodes occurred during the first 12 months of follow-up, resulting in a rebleeding rate of 33.1% at 6 months, 39.1% at 12 months and 52.6% at 24 months. 

All rebleeding events occurred within the first 24 months of follow-up and the last rebleeding event occurred after 23 months of follow-up, whereas after 24 months of follow-up, only 5 patients without a rebleed event maintained a follow-up for a maximum period of 44 months. None of these 5 patients re-bled during this follow-up period. None of the variables analyzed including age, gender, medical comorbidities, past abdominal surgery, medications, type of first rebleeding episode and characteristics of the first and second DAE were associated with a significantly higher risk of rebleeding after two endoscopic therapy sessions according to univariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

In Western countries, SBVL represent the most frequent small bowel finding in patients with OGIB 10. 3 The exact prevalence of angioectasias is unclear because most patients are asymptomatic and only 10% of all patients will experience a symptomatic gastrointestinal bleed during their lifetime 13) (17) (18) .(5) (7) (11 The clinical presentation of angioectasias includes overt bleeding or iron deficiency anemia, which represent the main indications for endoscopic treatment 3) (13) (19) (20) (5) (10 Nevertheless, recurrence rates after medical, endoscopic and/or surgical therapy of SBVL remain unclear 10) (13. A recent study revealed that the global rebleeding rate after one session of endoscopic treatment of SBVL is 40% and rebleeding after two years of follow-up occurs in 38.2% of patients 9. Moreover 12, two recent systematic reviews revealed a rebleeding rate of 45% in patients with a mean follow-up time of 26 ± 15 months and 42.7% during 1.5 to 2 years 13) (17 It should be noted that most studies only evaluated rebleeding rates of SBVL after one endoscopic session and data with regard to the outcome of additional endoscopic sessions of SBVL are 5) (7 very scarce.

In this study, the global rebleeding was 40.5% in patients with angioectasias who underwent a second endoscopic session with DAE. Moreover, most rebleeding episodes (13/15, 86.7%) occurred during the first 12 months of follow-up. In spite of the high absolute rebleeding rate detected shortly after endoscopic therapy, a relative effective reduction of rebleeding occurred in a subset of patients. In this sense, there are a high proportion of patients that presented with angioectasia-related OGIB who will need several DAE procedures during their natural history. However, the goal in this selected group of patients with recurrent OGIB episodes should also include a decrease in transfusion requirements and the stabilization of hemoglobin levels as well as the reduction of the absolute rebleed rate, as previously demonstrated in treatment-naïve patients 9. Most of these patients have many comorbidities and severe acute OGIB episodes which may be avoided or minimized with an adequate endoscopic treatment and follow-up. Other reports suggest a reduction in rebleeding rates in patients who received additional therapy. This is probably as a result of intensive enteroscopy and increased complete enteroscopy rates, which may allow the treatment of SBVL that were not reached in previous examinations as there were multiple lesions occurring throughout the gastrointestinal tract 15) (18) (21) (22.

Furthermore, the rebleeding rate of the second endoscopic treatment observed at 12 months (39.1%) was similar to the rebleeding rate at 24 months previously reported in studies of naïve patients 9) (13) (17. The reason for the increased early rebleeding rate in patients who have previously re-bled after a first endoscopic treatment is unknown. In addition to treatment inefficacy and the multiplicity of small-bowel angioectasias, some of which may be missed, this group of patients may be more prone to bleed.

Alternative treatment modalities for angioectasias include medical treatment or surgery. Studies regarding the use of medical therapy are limited and comprise a small number of patients 3) (13. 5) 10)Recent evidence failed to confirm the efficacy of treatment with estrogens and progesterone 3) (13. 5) (10On the contrary, somatostatin analogues and thalidomide showed a reduction in bleeding rates and the need for blood transfusions 3) (13. 5) (10However, the use of thalidomide may be limited due to the significant side effects on the central nervous system. Nowadays, the use of intraoperative enteroscopy and enterectomy for the treatment of angioectasias has been replaced by CE and DAE 13) (23. 5 As both endoscopic and medical therapies are still used in clinical practice for SBVL, the cornerstone of endoscopic treatment may encompass a strict selection of patients and lesions characteristics 3. Future studies are needed to compare different approaches, including repeated endoscopic therapy sessions or a combination of endoscopic treatment and medical therapy 10) (21.

The present study has potential limitations, including its retrospective nature and the small number of cases. However, studies evaluating rebleeding after a first endoscopic treatment are also based on small patient groups.

In conclusion, despite the high absolute rebleeding rate detected shortly after endoscopic therapy, further endoscopic sessions for angioectasias may be beneficial due to the relative effective reduction of rebleeding in a sub-group of patients.

REFERENCES

1. Min YW, Kim JS, Jeon SW, et al. Long-term outcome of capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy 2014;46:59-65. [ Links ]

2. Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015;47:352-76. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391855 [ Links ]

3. Ribeiro I, Pinho R, Rodrigues A, et al. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Which factors are associated with positive capsule endoscopy findings? Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2015;107:334-9. [ Links ]

4. Lecleire S, Iwanicki-Caron I, Di-Fiore A, et al. Yield and impact of emergency capsule enteroscopy in severe obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2012;44:337-42. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291614 [ Links ]

5. Fisher LR, Hasler WL. New vision in video capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:392-405. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.88 [ Links ]

6. Pinto-Pais T, Pinho R, Rodrigues A, et al. Emergency single-balloon enteroscopy in overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: Efficacy and safety. United European Gastroenterol J 2014;2:490-6. DOI: 10.1177/2050640614554850 [ Links ]

7. Nadler M, Eliakim R. The role of capsule endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014;7:87-92. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X13504727 [ Links ]

8. Gralnek IM. Obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2005;128:1424-30. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.067 [ Links ]

9. Pinho R, Ponte A, Rodrigues A, et al. Long-term rebleeding risk following endoscopic therapy of small-bowel vascular lesions with device-assisted enteroscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;28:479-85. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000552 [ Links ]

10. Rahmi G, Samaha E, Vahedi K, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing capsule and double-balloon enteroscopy for identification and treatment of small-bowel vascular lesions: a prospective, multicenter study. Endoscopy 2014;46:591-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365514 [ Links ]

11. Samaha E, Rahmi G, Landi B, et al. Long-term outcome of patients treated with double balloon enteroscopy for small bowel vascular lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:240-6. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.325 [ Links ]

12. Curdia Goncalves T, Magalhaes J, Boal Carvalho P, et al. Is it possible to predict the presence of intestinal angioectasias? Diagn Ther Endosc 2014; 2014:461602. [ Links ]

13. Jackson CS, Gerson LB. Management of gastrointestinal angiodysplastic lesions (GIADs): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:474-83; quiz 484. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.19 [ Links ]

14. Perez-Cuadrado Robles E, Bebia Conesa P, Esteban Delgado P, et al. Emergency double-balloon enteroscopy combined with real-time viewing of capsule endoscopy: a feasible combined approach in acute overt-obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Dig Endosc 2015;27:338-44. [ Links ]

15. May A, Friesing-Sosnik T, Manner H, et al. Long-term outcome after argon plasma coagulation of small-bowel lesions using double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with mid-gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2011;43:759-65. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256388 [ Links ]

16. Yano T, Yamamoto H, Sunada K, et al. Endoscopic classification of vascular lesions of the small intestine (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67: 169-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.005 [ Links ]

17. Romagnuolo J, Brock AS, Ranney N. Is endoscopic therapy effective for angioectasia in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?: A systematic review of the literature. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:823-30. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000266 [ Links ]

18. Pinho R, Mascarenhas-Saraiva M, Mao-de-Ferro S, et al. Multicenter survey on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in Portugal. United European Gastroenterol J 2016;4:264-74. DOI: 10.1177/2050640615604775 [ Links ]

19. Bollinger E, Raines D, Saitta P. Distribution of bleeding gastrointestinal angioectasias in a Western population. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:6235-9. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i43.6235 [ Links ]

20. Robles EP. Emergency capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy may be a first-line procedure in massive acute overt-obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:294. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.393 [ Links ]

21. Fernandes C, Pinho R, Rodrigues A, et al. Argon plasma coagulation of a bleeding angioectasia in a jejunal diverticulum by single-balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2015;47(Suppl 1 UCTN):E62. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390918 [ Links ]

22. Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Esteban-Delgado P, Martínez-Andrés B, et al. Diagnosis agreement between capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding at a referral center. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2015;8:495-500. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3665/2015 [ Links ]

23. Gerson LB, Batenic MA, Newsom SL, et al. Long-term outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:664-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.021 [ Links ]

Received: January 30, 2017; Accepted: September 18, 2017

Correspondence: Ana Ponte. Department of Gastroenterology. Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho. Gaia, Portugal. e-mail: ana.ilponte@gmail.com