SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue1Energy drinks consumption prevalence, motivation and associated factors in Medical students: cross-sectional studyFood and nutrition education to reduce obesity in schoolchildren in Panama: study protocol author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

My SciELO

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética

On-line version ISSN 2174-5145Print version ISSN 2173-1292

Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet vol.24 n.1 Pamplona Jan./Mar. 2020  Epub Oct 19, 2020

https://dx.doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.24.1.824 

INVESTIGATIONS

Association between household socioeconomic level and consumption of fast food and soft drinks: a cross-sectional assessment of the Young Lives cohort in Peru

Asociación entre el nivel socioeconómico de la vivienda y el consumo de comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas: análisis transversal de la cohorte Niños del Milenio en Perú

Carol Argelia Najara  , Jessi Nataly Vila-Quispea  , Laura Astete-Robilliarda  , Antonio Bernabe-Ortizb  c  * 

aUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú.

bUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

cUniversidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú.

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The consumption of fast food and soft drinks is a risk factor for developing overweight and obesity. This study aimed at assessing if there is association between household socioeconomic level and the consumption of fast food and soft drinks among children.

Material and Methods:

A cross-sectional assessment of the data from the third round (2009-2010) of the youngest cohort of the Young Lives study in Peru was conducted. Sampling was conducted in three stages: in the first one, the country was divided into equal geographical regions, excluding the 5% of the richest district; in the second stage, 20 sentinel sites were chosen and an area within each sentinel site was selected. Finally, in the third stage, eligible children were selected. Outcomes were the self-reported consumption of fast food and soft drinks (never, sometimes, and always), whereas the exposure was household socioeconomic status (in quintiles). Crude and adjusted models were created between variables of interest using Poisson regression models, with robust variance, to report prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results:

Data of 1901 children, of which 942 (49.6%) were girls, with a mean age of 7.5 (SD: 0.5) was analyzed. A total of 24.1% (95%CI: 22.2%-26.1%) reported always consuming fast food, whilst this number was 22.4% (20.5%-24.3%) for soft drinks. Compared to the lowest socioeconomic quintile, those who were in higher socioeconomic status had more probability of consuming fast food and soft drinks (Chi-squared for trends <0.001). The highest socioeconomic quintile had a greater probability to always consume fast food (PR=1.42; 95%CI: 1.08-1.88) and soft drinks (PR=1.71; 95%CI: 1.24-2.37).

Conclusions:

This study shows that there is a significant association between the household socioeconomic level and the consumption of soft drinks and fast food.

KEYWORDS: Fast Foods; Sugar-Sweetened Beverages; Obesity; Social Class

RESUMEN

Introducción:

El consumo de comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas es un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de sobrepeso y obesidad. Este estudio evaluó si existe asociación entre el nivel socioeconómico de la vivienda y el consumo de comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas en niños.

Material y Métodos:

Evaluación transversal de los datos de la tercera ronda (2009-2010) de la cohorte más joven del estudio Niños de Milenio en Perú. El muestreo fue realizado en tres fases: en la primera, el país fue dividido en regiones geográficas iguales excluyendo al 5% de los distritos con mejor nivel económico; mientras que en la segunda fase se escogieron 20 sitios de vigilancia y un área dentro de ellas. Finalmente, en la tercera fase, se escogieron a los niños elegibles. Las variables fueron el autorreporte del consumo de comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas (nunca, algunas veces y siempre), mientras que la exposición fue el nivel socioeconómico de la vivienda (dividido en quintiles). Se crearon modelos crudos y ajustados entre las variables de interés usando modelos de regresión de Poisson, con varianza robusta, para reportar razones de prevalencia (RP) y sus intervalos de confianza al 95% (IC 95%).

Resultados:

Los datos de 1901 niños, de los cuales 942 (49,6%) fueron mujeres, con una media de edad de 7,5 (DE: 0,5), fueron analizados. Un total de 24,1% (IC95%: 22,2%-26,1%) reportó siempre consumir comida rápida, y de este número fue 22,4% (IC95%: 20,5%-24,3%) para bebidas azucaradas. Comparado con el nivel socioeconómico más bajo, aquellos niños en el nivel socioeconómico más alto tuvieron mayor probabilidad de consumir comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas (Chi cuadrado de tendencias <0,001). El más alto quintil socioeconómico tuvo mayor probabilidad de consumir comida rápida (RP=1,42; IC95%: 1,08-1,88) y bebidas azucaradas (RP=1,71; IC95%: 1,24-2,37).

Conclusiones:

Este estudio muestra que existe una asociación significativa entre el nivel socioeconómico de la vivienda y el consumo de comida rápida y bebidas azucaradas en niños.

PLABRAS CLAVE: Comida Rápida; Bebidas Azucaradas; Obesidad; Clase Social

INTRODUCTION

Obesity, a condition that can appear at any stage of life, is considered the 21st century pandemic, affecting countries with different economies1. Additionally, obesity among children is considered a new challenge for public health2. Obesity has been associated with other chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction, fatty liver disease, hypercholesterolemia, several cancers, among other diseases3. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report4, overweight and obesity in children under 5 years old increased globally from 0.8% in 1975 to 6.8% in 2016. In Peru, children under 5 years with overweight and obesity were 7.4% and 1.9% in 2014, whereas children aged between 5 and 9 years with overweight and obesity represented 17.5% and 14.8%, respectively5.

The increased rates of overweight and obesity can be attributed to the high intake of energy-rich foods, high in sugar and saturated fats, mainly fast food and ultra-processed foods6. Fast food are products that are precooked or cooked, served in restaurants, usually highly caloric, poor in nutrients, and potentially harmful to health7. On the other hand, soft drinks are carbonated drinks whose main component is sugar, making them very energy enriched8. Some studies conducted in the United States have reported that individuals who consumed fast food and soft drinks more frequently had excess weight and unhealthy habits9-10. Another study, conducted in adults, showed that people who consume fast food once a week had 20% higher risk of developing coronary heart disease compared to those who never consumed, and this risk increases to 50% and 80% for those who consume fast food two or three times a week and more than three times a week, respectively9-10.

Among children this picture seems to be similar. Thus, a systematic review found that children and adolescents with obesity were five times more likely to continue with this condition in adulthood11. There are several factors associated with the consumption of fast food and soft drinks, mainly focused on the individual and the community. Among the individual factors are the taste for this type of food and the knowledge about appropriate nutrition habits12; whilst among those at the community levels are the habit of family consumption13, economic development14, and urbanization15-16. Among the latter, the socioeconomic factor may play an important role in the access to unhealthy food. However, the impact of socioeconomic position may vary according to the nutritional transition stage in which the country is going on. Thus, in some countries, high socioeconomic position is associated with high unhealthy food consumption, whereas there is a negative association in other societies17.

Therefore, this study aimed at determining whether there is association between household socioeconomic level and the consumption of fast food and soft drinks among children of the Young Lives Cohort in Peru. Our hypothesis is that high socioeconomic position would be associated with greater fast food and soft drink consumption.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Design and study population

This is a cross-sectional assessment of the Young Lives Cohort Study, a longitudinal study conducted in four developing countries: Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam18. This study started in 2002 with two base groups: infants from 6 to 18 months (younger cohort) and children from 7 to 8 years (older cohort) who were chosen at random. At present, the follow-ups have been carried out for a period of almost 15 years, 2006-2007 (second round), 2009-2010 (third round), 2012-2013 (fourth round) and 2016-2017 (fifth round) for both cohorts.

Selection of participants

The original study was undertaken in three stages. In the first stage, the country was split into equal geographical regions, based on the national poverty map of Peru developed in 2000 by the National Compensation and Social Development Fund (FONCODES in Spanish)19. Aimed at over-representing the poorest areas, the 5% of the wealthiest districts (i.e. those with the highest socioeconomic status) were excluded and a systematic sample of the remaining districts was carried out. In the second stage, 20 sentinel sites were chosen and an area within each sentinel site was selected using table of random numbers. Once the census areas were selected, a random sample of blocks was selected. In the third stage, the children who were within the selection parameters (6 to 18 months) and those who were in the chosen blocks were selected. The objective was to survey 100 children for each sentinel site.

For the present manuscript, Peruvian children from the younger cohort were included, using data from the third round (2009-2010) of the Young Lives Study. The information was taken from the household survey, available at the official webpage of Young Lives. The household questionnaire was completed by the head of the family and includes questions about household composition, characteristics of the child caregiver, socioeconomic status, child health (including eating habits), anthropometrics, etc. Only those with complete information on the variables of interest (socioeconomic level, consumption of fast food and soft drinks) were analysed.

Sample size

Regarding the sample size, estimations were conducted assuming a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, a total of 948 individuals were needed to find a difference of 5% in the proportion of children consuming fast food in the highest and lowest quintile of socioeconomic status, based on results of a previous study20. Since 2052 children were enrolled at the study baseline, and 92 were lost to follow up until the third assessment, 1940 were available for analyses. However, of them, only 1901 had complete data with the variables of interest and were included in the manuscript. Nevertheless, this sample size was enough to find the association of interest.

Definition of variables

Two outcome variables were used. The first one was the consumption of fast food, defined based on the question “During the past 30 days, how many times have the child eaten salty and fatty foods?” Peruvian examples were used to clarify this question including well-known products such as fries, burgers, pizza, grilled chicken, etc. On the other hand, the second outcome was the consumption of soft drinks, evaluated through the question “During the past 30 days, have the child taken soft drinks?” Similarly, some examples of sodas were used to clarify this question. Both questions had six response options: daily, two to three times a week, once a week, every two weeks, less than every two weeks, and never. For analyses purposes, these options were categorised into three groups: always (including the options “daily” and “two to three times a day”), sometimes (“once a week”, “every 2 weeks” and “less than every fortnight”) and never.

The exposure variable was the household socioeconomic level measured by using a wealth index, a variable constructed by the Young Lives study based on three measures: quality of housing, access to services, and assets possession at home. These measures were obtained from the questions asked to the family head using the household survey and carried out face to face. The indicator of the quality of housing was obtained through the simple average of the quality of the material of the floor, ceiling and walls, and also included household density. Access to basic services was obtained through the simple average of possession of electricity, water, sanitation and cooking fuel; while, for the calculation of the assets index, the simple average of the list of possession of domestic articles was estimated. Finally, the calculation of the wealth index was the result of the simple average of the three indexes, obtaining a value between 0 and 1, where a number closer to one indicates a higher socioeconomic status. For analyses purposes, this variable was divided into quintiles, with the first quintile being the poorest and the fifth quintile the wealthiest.

Other variables were taken into account to evaluate the association of interest including: sex (male vs. female), age (7 and 8 years), geographical area (urban vs. rural), mother’s education level (<7 years, 7-11 years, and ≥12 years), father’s educational level (<7 years, 7-11 years, and ≥12 years), physical activity of the child in the last 7 days, based on the mother self-report of physical activity of at least one hour per day (<7 days a week and 7 days a week), number of meals in the last 24 hours (5 times a day, <5 times a day, and >5 times a day), presence of excess of weight according to the child’s body mass index (yes or no). Body mass index (BMI) in the child was calculated based on the Z-score taken from the World Health Organization (WHO) reference tables. Finally, the BMI of the mother (normal, overweight and obese) was also used, obtained from the weight and height data and the use of international standards.

Procedures

All the interviewers were trained to comply with the protocol of collection, data entry, data cleaning, and storage of the information. Each team collecting data in each sentinel site was comprised by a researcher, a fieldworker and a psychologist17. For the anthropometric data collection, an anthropometrist was trained according to the techniques of the WHO. For the evaluation of height, a stadiometer was used, and standing height information was collected; whereas calibrated digital scales were utilised for weight (in kg). Data was entry and processed using Microsoft Access.

Statistical analysis

Data was analysed using STATA 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, US). Initially, the description of quantitative variables was conducted using means and standard deviations (SD) and, in the case of categorical variables, proportions. Then, a descriptive analysis of the characteristics of both child and parents according to the household socioeconomic level, and subsequently, according to fast food and soft drinks consumption was conducted. Chi square test was used to evaluate these comparisons. Finally, crude and adjusted models were created to assess the association between household socioeconomic level and fast food and soft drinks, using Poisson regression models with robust variance, reporting prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In these latter models, the first (lower) quintile of socioeconomic level was used as the reference group as our hypothesis expected to have an increasing consumption of unhealthy food with higher socioeconomic status. Finally, the variance inflation factor was used to avoid collinearity in the final model.

Ethics

The initial study was approved by the Social Sciences Ethics Division of the University of Oxford 18. In addition, the study was approved by each country where it was developed. Thus, in Peru, the original study was approved by the ethics committee of Instituto de Investigación Nutricional. This research protocol and analysis were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC, in Lima, Peru.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study population

From 2052 subjects originally enrolled at the baseline of the study, 112 (5.5%) children were lost to follow-up and 39 (1.9%) children did not have complete data. Thus, data of 1901 children, of which 942 (49.6%) were girls, with a mean age of 7.5 (SD: 0.5) were further analyzed.

The description of participants according to the household socioeconomic level is shown in Table 1. Of note, as household socioeconomic level increases, mother’s and father’s education level also do so. On the contrary, at higher household socioeconomic level, children tend to perform less physical activity and have a higher prevalence of excess of weight.

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population according to household socioeconomic level 

Socioeconomic level
Quintile I N=389 Quintile II N=389 Quintile III N=391 Quintile IV N=389 Quintile V N=385 p-value
Sex
Male 199 (47.3%) 210 (53.6%) 183 (51.3%) 187 (50.8%) 180 (49.6%) 0.49
Female 222 (52.7%) 182 (46.4%) 174 (48.7%) 181 (49.2%) 183 (50.4%)
Age
Mean (SD) 7.5 (0.5) 7.4 (0.5) 7.5 (0.5) 7.5 (0.5) 7.4 (0.5) 0.82
Geographical area
Urban 122 (28.5%) 218 (54.9%) 327 (89.8%) 351 (95.4%) 364 (99.2%) < 0.001
Rural 306 (71.5%) 179 (45.1%) 37 (10.2%) 17 (4.6%) 3 (0.8%)
Mother’s educational level
< 7 years 337 (80.4%) 268 (68.9%) 141 (39.6%) 64 (17.7%) 39 (10.7%) < 0.001
7 - 11 years 76 (18.1%) 99 (25.5%) 166 (46.6%) 186 (51.5%) 164 (45.2%)
12+ years 6 (1.4%) 22 (5.7%) 49 (13.8%) 111 (30.8%) 160 (44.1%)
Father’s educational level
< 7 years 254 (64.3%) 198 (52.9%) 105 (29.8%) 44 (12.1%) 28 (7.9%) < 0.001
7 - 11 years 124 (31.4%) 151 (40.4%) 197 (56.0%) 197 (54.1%) 154 (43.4%)
12+ year 17 (4.3%) 25 (6.7%) 50 (14.2%) 123 (33.8%) 173 (48.7%)
Physical activity
< 7 times / week 255 (59.4%) 271 (68.3%) 236 (64.7%) 257 (69.8%) 270 (73.6%) < 0.001
7 times/week 174 (40.6%) 126 (31.7%) 129 (35.3%) 111 (30.2%) 97 (26.4%)
Number of meals in 24 hours
5 times/day 175 (40.8%) 194 (48.9%) 193 (52.7%) 203 (55.2%) 189 (51.5%) < 0.001
< 5 times/day 188 (43.8%) 146 (36.8%) 87 (23.8%) 76 (20.7%) 70 (19.1%)
> 5 times/day 66 (15.4%) 57 (14.4%) 86 (23.5%) 89 (24.1%) 108 (29.4%)
Excess of weight
Without excess weight 371 (87.0%) 330 (83.1%) 264 (72.1%) 234 (64.8%) 192 (53.0%) < 0.001
With excess weight 56 (13.1%) 67 (16.9%) 102 (27.9%) 133 (36.2%) 171 (47.1%)
Mother’s BMI
Normal 211 (53.4%) 161 (41.8%) 83 (23.9%) 97 (27.8%) 88 (25.1%) < 0.001
Overweight 139 (35.2%) 167 (43.4%) 169 (48.7%) 163 (46.7%) 149 (42.6%)
Obesity 45 (11.4%) 57 (14.8%) 95 (27.4%) 89 (25.5%) 113 (32.3%)

Fast food and soft drink consumption

Overall, 24.1% of children reported having always consumed fast food, while only 20.1% reported never having to do so. The prevalence of fast food consumption increases with higher household socioeconomic level, reaching a maximum in the fourth quintile and decreasing after that (Table 2). In addition, children who always consumed fast food were concentrated in the urban area, had less physical activity levels, ate more than 5 meals a day, had overweight mothers, and had greater excess of weight.

Table 2. Characteristics of the study population according to fast food and soda consumption 

Fast food consumption Consumption of soft drinks
Never N=384 Sometimes N=1058 Always N=248 p-value Never N=248 Sometimes N=1228 Always N=425 p-value
Sex
Male 191 (49.7%) 549 (51.9%) 125 (50.4%) 0.31 125 (50.4%) 615 (50.1%) 219 (51.5%) 0.88
Female 193 (50.3%) 509 (48.1%) 123 (49.6%) 123 (49.6%) 613 (49.9%) 206 (48.5%)
Age
Mean (SD) 7.4 (0.5) 7.5 (0.5) 7.4 (0.5) 0.77 7.4 (0.5) 7.5 (0.5) 7.4 (0.5) 0.43
Geographical area
Urban 196 (51.3%) 808 (76.4%) 136 (54.8%) < 0.001 136 (54.8%) 870 (71.0%) 356 (83.8%) < 0.001
Rural 186 (48.7%) 249 (23.6%) 112 (45.2%) 112 (45.2%) 355 (29.0%) 69 (16.2%)
Mother’s educational level
< 7 years 258 (67.5%) 416 (39.7%) 171 (69.5%) < 0.001 171 (69.5%) 543 (44.5%) 135 (32.1%) < 0.001
7 - 11 years 94 (24.6 %) 415 (39.6%) 53 (21.6 %) 53 (21.6 %) 443 (36.3%) 195 (46.3%)
12+ years 30 (7.9%) 218 (20.8%) 22 (8.9%) 22 (8.9%) 235 (19.2%) 91 (21.6%)
Father’s educational level
< 7 years 189 (52.1%) 312 (30.3%) 126 (53.8%) < 0.001 126 (53.8%) 385 (32.3%) 118 (28.4%) < 0.001
7 - 11 years 138 (38.0%) 478 (46.4%) 79 (33.8%) 79 (33.8%) 546 (45.9%) 198 (47.6%)
12+ years 36 (9.9%) 240 (23.3%) 29 (12.4%) 29 (12.4%) 259 (21.8%) 100 (24.0%)
Physical activity
< 7 times/week 257 (66.9%) 745 (70.5%) 168 (67.7%) < 0.001 168 (67.7%) 837 (68.2%) 266 (62.6%) 0.10
7 times/week 127 (33.1%) 312 (29.5%) 80 (32.3%) 80 (32.3%) 390 (31.8%) 159 (37.4%)
Number of meals in 24 hours
5 times/day 172 (44.8%) 555 (52.5%) 114 (46.0%) < 0.001 114 (46.0%) 626 (51.0%) 205 (48.2%) < 0.001
< 5 times/day 147 (38.3%) 286 (27.0%) 104 (41.9%) 104 (41.9%) 352 (28.7%) 99 (23.3%)
> 5 times/day 65 (16.9%) 217 (20.5%) 30 (12.1%) 30 (12.1%) 250 (20.4%) 121 (28.5%)
Excess of weight
Without excess weight 321 (83.6%) 737 (70.0%) 204 (82.3%) < 0.001 204 (82.3%) 902 (73.6%) 265 (62.8%) < 0.001
With excess weight 63 (16.4%) 316 (30.0%) 44 (17.7%) 44 (17.7%) 323 (26.4%) 157 (37.2%)
Mother’s BMI
Normal 152 (41.6%) 333 (33.2%) 103 (44.6%) 0.002 103 (44.6%) 419 (35.8%) 109 (27.3%) < 0.001
Overweight 159 (43.6%) 439 (43.8%) 98 (42.4%) 98 (42.4%) 509 (43.4%) 171 (42.9%)
Obesity 54 (14.8%) 231 (23.0%) 30 (13.0%) 30 (13.0%) 244 (20.8%) 119 (29.8%)
Household socioeconomic level
Quintile I 125 (32.5%) 173 (16.4%) 87 (35.1%) < 0.001 87 (35.1%) 245 (20.0%) 41 (9.7%) < 0.001
Quintile II 125 (32.5%) 194 (18.3%) 76 (30.6%) 76 (30.6%) 246 (20.1%) 59 (13.9%)
Quintile III 64 (16.7%) 220 (20.8%) 44 (17.7%) 44 (17.7%) 248 (20.2%) 89 (20.9%)
Quintile IV 41 (10.7%) 205 (19.4%) 16 (6.5%) 16 (6.5%) 255 (20.7%) 116 (27.3%)
Quintile V 29 (7.6%) 266 (25.1%) 25 (10.1%) 25 (10.1%) 233 (19.0%) 120 (28.2%)

In the case of soft drinks, 22.3% of children reported having always consumed this kind of beverages, while only 13.0% reported never having to do so. The prevalence of soft drink consumption increases with higher household socioeconomic level, and similar to fast food, reached a maximum in the fourth quintile and decreasing after that (Table 2). Children who always consumed soft drinks were concentrated in the urban area, ate more than 5 meals a day, and had overweight mothers.

Association between socioeconomic status and consumption of fast food and soft drinks

In multivariable model and compared with the first socioeconomic quintile, those in the fourth (p=0.001) and fifth (p=0.01) quintile were more probable to always consume fast food after controlling for different confounders (Table 3). In addition, an increase in the strength of association was reached up to the fourth socioeconomic quintile and then decreased after that. The same pattern was found in those who reported eating fast food sometimes, though results were not significant.

Table 3. Association between household socioeconomic level and fast food and soft drinks consumption: crude and adjusted models 

Crude Model PR (95%CI) Adjusted model PR (95%CI)
FAST FOOD CONSUMPTION
Sometimes vs. never
Quintile I 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Quintile II 0.96 (0.90 - 1.02) 0.95 (0.89 - 1.01)
Quintile III 1.00 (0.95 - 1.06) 0.99 (0.93 - 1.07)
Quintile IV 1.08 (1.02 - 1.14) 1.08 (1.00 - 1.16)
Quintile V 0.95 (0.90 - 1.01) 0.94 (0.87 - 1.01)
Always vs. never
Quintile I 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Quintile II 0.89 (0.68 - 1.17) 0.83 (0.63 - 1.10)
Quintile III 1.61 (1.29 - 1.99) 1.30 (1.00 - 1.69)
Quintile IV 2.07 (1.70 - 2.51) 1.54 (1.19 - 1.99)
Quintile V 1.98 (1.60 - 2.44) 1.42 (1.08 - 1.88)
CONSUMPTION OF SOFT DRINKS
Sometimes vs. never
Quintile I 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Quintile II 1.04 (0.95 - 1.13) 1.01 (0.93 - 1.11)
Quintile III 1.15 (1.06 - 1.25) 1.09 (0.99 - 1.20)
Quintile IV 1.28 (1.19 - 1.37) 1.19 (1.09 - 1.31)
Quintile V 1.22 (1.13 - 1.32) 1.12 (1.02 - 1.24)
Always vs. never
Quintile I 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Quintile II 1.36 (0.99 - 1.87) 1.22 (0.88 - 1.68)
Quintile III 2.09 (1.58 - 2.76) 1.58 (1.15 - 2.18)
Quintile IV 2.74 (2.11 - 3.56) 2.01 (1.48 - 2.74)
Quintile V 2.58 (1.99 - 3.36) 1.71 (1.24 - 2.37)

Bolded estimates are significant (p<0.05).

*Adjusted for sex, age, geographic area, mother’s education level, physical activity, number of meals in 24 hours, excess of weight, and mother’s BM

On the other hand, compared to the first socioeconomic quintile, those in the third (p=0.001), fourth (p<0.001) and fifth (p<0.001) quintile were more probable to always consume soft drinks after controlling for different confounders (Table 3). Similarly, an increase in the strength of association was evident up to the fourth quintile and then reduced in the highest quintile. The same pattern was found in those who reported consuming soft drinks sometimes, although they were only significant in the fourth and fifth quintiles.

DISCUSSION

Main findings

Our cross-sectional analysis shows a positive relationship between household socioeconomic level and the consumption of soft drinks, a finding that is almost similar to that of fast food. In addition, the strength of the association increases up to the fourth socioeconomic quintile, and after that, drops in the fifth socioeconomic quintile. Finally, about a quarter of the children evaluated reported always consuming fast food and soft drinks.

Comparison with previous studies

Up to our knowledge, no previous studies in Peru have comprehensively reported the association between household socioeconomic status and the consumption of fast food and soft drinks. Moreover, no studies were found that have studied the prevalence of fast food and soft drinks consumption in our context. A longitudinal study using data of the younger cohort of the Young Lives reported that daily consumption of soft drinks was 22%, 30%, and 48% for the low, medium and high socioeconomic level, respectively21. For this latter report, the authors used information from the third and fourth round of assessments of the cohort, but the models were not controlled for potential confounders. On the other hand, other studies assessing the relationship between socioeconomic status and the consumption of soft drinks and fast food were very heterogeneous. A study conducted during the economic transition in South Korea showed a positive association between the consumption of soft drinks and fast food22; thus, as the population showed a higher wealth index, the consumption of soft drinks and fast food also increased. The increase in consumption was consistent up to the last quartile of wealth, a result very similar to our study. This finding is, however, contrasted with subsequent studies in the same country, in which as the local economy improved, the eating behavior of the adolescent population also improved, measured as higher consumption of fruits and vegetables and a decrease in the consumption of fast food and soft drinks23-24.

Regarding the consumption of soft drinks, a study conducted in Colombia aimed at finding socioeconomic differences associated with the consumption of soft drinks among children and adolescents25. This report found that children coming from homes of medium and high socioeconomic status had more probability of consuming soft beverages compared to those who came from lower socioeconomic levels. Of note, our findings as well as other from scientific literature, reflects how the trend of consumption of fast foods and soft drinks varies according to the socioeconomic gradient in each particular country. Thus, as the income of the population increased, also increases the consumption of fast food and soft drinks in developing countries; but, on the contrary, in developed countries, the poorest present a greater consumption of this type of products. For example, in Canada, children who belonged to a lower socioeconomic level were more likely to consume soft drinks compared to those who were from the higher socioeconomic status26.

Relevance in public health

As the economy of developing countries improves, individuals will adopt unhealthy behaviours belonging to developed countries, including their lifestyles and eating habits, many of which lead to problems of excess of weight27-28. This study reports that children from higher socioeconomic status tend to consume more fast food and soft drinks. Fast foods and soft drinks may have deleterious effect due to the additional caloric intake provided, which could trigger an excess of weight in children29. This process has been previously described by Popkin10,16 as nutritional transition. As countries are in different stage of this nutritional transition, findings of the association between socioeconomic position, including but not limited to income, socioeconomic status, educational level, assets, etc., and unhealthy diet may vary. This is the main reason why this association needs further scrutiny at the country and regional level. Thus, our results suggest the need to implement interventions aimed at reducing the consumption of fast food and soft drinks. Interventions may have a greater impact if they adopt education strategies30-33, as well as government policies such as the control of the advertising of these products34, increase in the tax on soft drinks and fast food35-36 in this way regulate their consumption and address the problem of obesity and other comorbidities.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies conducted in Peru to assess a potential association between household socioeconomic level and the consumption of fast food and soft drinks. However, this study has also limitations. First, the study design, a cross-sectional study in nature, cannot determine causality but the only association between the variables of interest. Second, some information bias may arise as questions were responded by mothers instead of children. On the other hand, only one question was used to collect information regarding fast food and soft drinks consumption; as a result information bias may arise as a concern. Similarly, recall bias may be present since the questions were based on the last 30 days before the interview, and moreover, 30 days may not be enough time to detect all the unhealthy food consumption as this can change according to seasons of the year. Finally, the instrument evaluated the consumption of soft drinks and fast food as frequency and not quantity (volume in the case of drinks).

CONCLUSIONS

This study evidenced an association between household socioeconomic level and the consumption of soft drinks and fast food: the consumption of these products increased with higher socioeconomic level. These results suggest the need of implementing comprehensive policies that regulate the consumption of these products, which may include food education, the regulation of advertising to children and taxation.

REFERENCES

1. NCD RisC Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017; 390(10113): 2627-42. [ Links ]

2. Bellew W, Bauman A, Kite J, et al. Obesity prevention in children and young people; what policy actions are needed. Public Health Res Pract. 2019; 29(1): pii:2911902. [ Links ]

3. Bhadoria A, Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury A, Sufi N, Kumar R. Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2015; 4(2): 187. [ Links ]

4. World Health Organization. World Heath Statistics 2018; Monitoring health for SDGs. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO: 2018. [ Links ]

5. Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Instituto Nacional de Salud. Centro Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición. Estado nutricional por etapas de vida en la población peruana; 2013-2014. Lima, Perú; MINSA: 2015. [ Links ]

6. Pan American Health Organization. Ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: trends, impact on obesity, policy implications. Washington DC, US: PAHO; 2015. [ Links ]

7. Stanhope KL. Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016; 53(1): 52-67. [ Links ]

8. Blecher E, Liber AC, Drope JM, Nguyen B, Stoklosa M. Global trends in the affordability of sugar-sweetened beverages, 1990-2016. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017; 14: E37. [ Links ]

9. Vikraman S, Fryar CD, Odgen CL. Caloric intake from fast food among children and adolescents in the United States, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2015; 213: 1-8. [ Links ]

10. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012; 70(1): 3-21. [ Links ]

11. Simmonds M, Burch J, Llewellyn A, et al. The use of measures of obesity in childhood for predicting obesity and the development of obesity-related diseases in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19(43): 1-336. [ Links ]

12. Brown K, Mcilveen H, Strugnell C. Nutritional awareness and food preferences of young consumers. Nutr Food Sci. 2000; 30(5): 230-5. [ Links ]

13. Haerens L, Craeynest M, Deforche B, Maes L, Cardon G, Bourdeaudhuij I. The contribution of psychosocial and home environmental factors in explaining eating behaviours in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008; 62(1): 51-9. [ Links ]

14. Marmot M. The influence of income on health: Views of an epidemiologist. Health Aff. 2002; 21(2): 31-46. [ Links ]

15. Janssen HG, Davies IG, Richardson LD, Stevenson L. Determinants of takeaway and fast food consumption: a narrative review. Nutr Res Rev. 2017; (8): 1-19. [ Links ]

16. Popkin BM. Relationship between shifts in food system dynamics and acceleration of the global nutrition transition. Nutr Rev. 2017; 75(2): 73-82. [ Links ]

17. Colchero MA, Salgado JC, Unar-Munguía M, Hernández-Ávila M, Rivera-Dommarco JA. Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico. Econ Hum Biol. 2015; 19: 129-37. [ Links ]

18. Morrow V, Crivello G, Cunningham R, Espinoza-Revollo P, Moore R, Solon A. A Guide to Young Lives Research. Oxford, UK: Young Lives; 2017. [ Links ]

19. Escobal J, Flores E. An assessment of the Young Lives sampling approach in Peru. Oxford, UK. Young Lives; 2018. [ Links ]

20. Hopping BN, Erber E, Mead E, Sheehy T, Roache C, Sharma S. Socioeconomic indicators and frequency of traditional food, junk food, and fruit and vegetable consumption amongst Inuit adults in the Canadian Arctic. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010; 23(1): 51-8. [ Links ]

21. Alviso-Orellana C, Estrada-Tejada D, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Sweetened beverages, snacks and overweight: findings from the Young Lives cohort study in Peru. Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21(9): 1627-33. [ Links ]

22. Lim H, Lee HJ, Choue R, Wang Y. Trends in Fast-food and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and their association with social environmental status in South Korea. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118(7): 1228-36. [ Links ]

23. Bae SG, Kim JY, Kim KY, Park SW, Bae J, Lee WK. Changes in dietary behavior among adolescents and their association with government nutrition policies in Korea, 2005-2009. J Prev Med Public Health. 2012; 45(1): 47-59. [ Links ]

24. Shi Z, Lien N, Kumar BN, Holmboe-Ottesen G. Socio-demographic differences in food habits and preferences of school adolescents in Jiangsu Province, China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59(12): 1439-48. [ Links ]

25. Ramírez-Vélez R, González-Ruíz K, Correa-Bautista JE, Meneses-Echávez JF, Martínez-Torres J. Demographic and socioeconomic in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among Colombian children and adolescents. Nutr Hosp. 2015; 31(6): 2479-86. [ Links ]

26. Pabayo R, Spence JC, Cutumisu N, Casey L, Storey K. Sociodemographic, behavioural and environmental correlates of sweetened beverage consumption among pre-school children. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15(8): 1338-46. [ Links ]

27. Fleischhacker SE, Evenson KR, Rodriguez DA, Ammerman AS. A systematic review of fast food access studies. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(501): 460-71. [ Links ]

28. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012; 70(1): 3-21. [ Links ]

29. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva, Switzerland; WHO: 2018. [ Links ]

30. Bonilla C, Hijar G, Márquez D, Aramburú A, Aparco JP, Gutiérrez EL. Interventions to prevent the development of overweight and obesity in children younger than 5 years. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2017; 34(4): 682. [ Links ]

31. Morano M, Rutigliano I, Rago A, Pettoello-Mantovani M, Campanozzi A. A multi-component, school-initiated obesity intervention to promote healthy lifestyles in children. Nutrition 2016; 32(10): 1075-80. [ Links ]

32. Perez-Villasante L, Raigada-Mares J, Collins-Estrada A, et al. Effectiveness of an educational program focusing in healthy lifestyles for overweight and obesity reduction in Robert M. Smith School, Huaraz, Ancash, Peru. Acta Med Peruana. 2008; 25(4): 204-9. [ Links ]

33. Pehlke EL, Letona P, Ramirez-Zea M, Gittelsohn J. Healthy casetas: a potential strategy to improve the food environment in low-income schools to reduce obesity in children in Guatemala City. Ecol Food Nutr. 2016; 55(3): 324-38. [ Links ]

34. Hunter NE. Revisiting the regulation debate: The effect of food marketing on childhood obesity. Pierce Law Rev. 2008; 7: 205. [ Links ]

35. Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 3. [ Links ]

36. Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, OSullivan G, MacGregor-Skinner E, Spranca M. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9): 1-23. [ Links ]

CITA: Najar CA, Vila-Quispe JN, Astete-Robilliard L, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Association between household socioeconomic level and consumption of fast food and soft drinks: a cross-sectional assessment of the Young Lives cohort in Peru. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2020; 24(1): 68-77. doi: 10.14306/renhyd.24.1.824.

Recibido: 02 de Julio de 2019; Aprobado: 27 de Diciembre de 2019; : 16 de Enero de 2020

* antonio.bernabe@upch.pe

Assigned Editor

Carolina Aguirre-Polanco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago, Chile.

Competing interests

Authors state that there are no conflicts of interest in preparing the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License