SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 número3Occult thyroid carcinoma: a tertiary hospital experience in Ibadan, NigeriaA reliability and validity study on upper limb range of motion measurement using mobile sensor compared with goniometers índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine

versión On-line ISSN 2695-5075versión impresa ISSN 2695-5075

Iberoam J Med vol.3 no.3 Logroño ago. 2021  Epub 25-Dic-2023

https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4899616 

Original Article

Prevalence and antibiotics susceptibility pattern of urine bacterial isolates from Tripoli Medical Center (TMC), Tripoli, Libya

Prevalencia y patrón de susceptibilidad a los antibióticos de los aislados bacterianos en orina del Centro Médico de Trípoli (TMC), Trípoli, Libia

Abir Ben Ashur1  abirjori@gmail.com, Hamida El Magrahi1  , Asma Elkammoshi1  , Hiba Alsharif1 

1Department of Medical Laboratories Sciences, Faculty of Medical Technology, Tripoli University, Tripoli, Libya

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common human bacterial infections encountered by physicians. The risk of resistant microbes is emerging as a result of the overuse of antibiotics treatments. The presence of pathogens with increased resistance to antimicrobial agents makes UTIs difficult to treat. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of the pathogens that cause UTIs, as well as the antibiotic susceptibility of these isolates.

Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted from February 2020 to April 2020; a total number of 200 urine samples were collected from patients who daily attended TMC Libya. Bacterial pathogens were determined by bacteriological culture methods and Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by using the disc diffusion method.

Results: Out of 200 samples, 110 cases had a positive culture. The dominant bacterial pathogens were Gram-negative that being with Escherichia coli (49, 55.68%), followed by Klebsiella pneumonia (18, 20.46%), Pseudomona aeruginosa (9, 10.23%), Proteus mirabilis (8, 9.09%), Enterobacter aerogenes (2, 2.27%), Citrobacter freundii (2, 2.27%). Gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus 20 (90.91%) followed by S. saprophyticus (2, 9.01%) of the isolate's strains. The isolated uropathogen showed increased levels of resistance to antibiotics. Where the Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus indicated the highest antibiotic resistance to Nitrofurantoin, Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, Tetracycline, Ciprofloxacin, Metronidazole and also revealed the most sensitivity to Cefixime followed by doxycycline and ceftriaxone.

Conclusions: The obtained results emphasized the emergence of highly resistant bacteria to most of the tested antimicrobials and propose the need for physicians to change their treatment pattern depending on antimicrobial susceptibility results.

Keywords Antibiotic resistance pattern; Urinary tract infection; Urine culture

Resumen

Introducción: Las infecciones del tracto urinario (ITU) son una de las infecciones bacterianas humanas más comunes que encuentran los médicos. El riesgo de microbios resistentes está surgiendo como resultado del uso excesivo de tratamientos con antibióticos. La presencia de patógenos con mayor resistencia a los agentes antimicrobianos dificulta el tratamiento de las infecciones urinarias. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar la prevalencia de los patógenos que causan las ITU, así como la susceptibilidad a los antibióticos de estos aislados.

Materiales y métodos: Este estudio prospectivo se realizó desde febrero de 2020 hasta abril de 2020; Se recogió un total de 200 muestras de orina de pacientes que asistían diariamente a TMC Libia. Los patógenos bacterianos se determinaron mediante métodos de cultivo bacteriológico y las pruebas de susceptibilidad a los antimicrobianos se realizaron mediante el método de difusión en disco.

Resultados: De 200 muestras, 110 casos tuvieron un cultivo positivo. Los patógenos bacterianos dominantes fueron Gram-negativos con Escherichia coli (49, 55.68%), seguidos de Klebsiella pneumonia (18, 20.46%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9, 10.23%), Proteus mirabilis (8, 9.09%), Enterobacter aerogenes (2, 2.27%). %), Citrobacter freundii (2, 2.27%). Las bacterias grampositivas fueron Staphylococcus aureus (20, 90.91%) seguido de S. saprophyticus, (2, 9.01%) de las cepas del aislado. El uropatógeno aislado mostró niveles aumentados de resistencia a los antibióticos. Donde Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus indicaron la mayor resistencia a los antibióticos a la nitrofurantoína, sulfametoxazol/trimetoprima, tetraciclina, ciprofloxacina, metronidazol y también revelaron la mayor sensibilidad a la cefixima seguida de la doxiciclina y la ceftriaxona.

Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos enfatizan la aparición de bacterias altamente resistentes a la mayoría de los antimicrobianos probados y proponen la necesidad de que los médicos cambien su patrón de tratamiento en función de los resultados de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana.

Palabras clave Patrón de resistencia a antibióticos; Infección del tracto urinario; Urocultivo

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infection is a common bacterial infection, known to affect various parts of the urinary tract and is observed in both genders. Even though both males and females are exposed to the infection, but women are more due to their morphology and reproductive physiology [1]. Besides one of the most prevalent infectious diseases found in outpatients is UTI. It is often caused by bacteria but may are also caused by fungi and viruses [2]. Gram-negative bacteria cause 90% of UTI cases while gram-positive bacteria cause only 10% of the cases. The frequency of the UTI depends on many factors that provide the prevalence of bacteria (for more than 10./ml) in the urine [3]. These bacteria cause UTI, and if not treated, the infection will spread and the patient will suffer severe consequences [4, 5, 6]. The most frequent isolated uropathogen is Escherichia coli, which accounts for 65-90% of urinary tract infections [7], followed by Staphylococcus species that constitute 10-15%. In addition, bacterial species such as Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Proteus, and Enterococcus play a minor role in infection transmission [1]. UTI is linked to several factors, including age, parity, gravidity, pregnancy, and the presence of diseases that exacerbate the infection [1]. UTI antibiotic therapy is normally performed before the results of the microbiology examination are received. This medication, when used without a rational drug prescription, will result in antibiotic resistance and treatment failure [3, 8]. One of the best achievements in modern medicine was the discovery of antibiotics [9]. However, the availability and expanded use of antibiotics eventually contribute to microbial resistance to them. [9]. Urinary tract infection accounts for a large part of antibacterial drug consumption. Antibiotic resistance increases daily, according to irrational usage, particularly in countries with unrestricted antibiotic policies and no accurate plans [10] like Libya. Antimicrobial resistance is becoming a global danger to public health, according to the World Health Organization in 2014, and all countries have concentrated on this issue, which is a significant threat to modern medicine [11]. The excessive use of antibiotics is the first significant element in increasing microbial resistance. The other factor is wrong and unreasonably prescribed antibiotics. While UTI is a widespread disease, it is quickly cured by the reasonable use of antibiotics [4]. Identifying and analyzing UTI-causing bacteria is efficient in treating the resistance of antibiotics [12]. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of bacteria associated with UTI cases and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

STUDY SITTING

The study population was drawn from patients attending Tripoli Medical Center, the hospital in Tripoli city - Libya. Overall, 200 untreated outpatients with different clinical symptoms of UTIs, were involved in this study which had a duration from February 2020 to April 2020 and was approved by the ethical committee of the department of medical technology, university of Tripoli, Libya.

INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patient's adults age ≥ 30 years with symptoms or suspected urinary tract infection (cystitis or pyelonephritis) or with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection were included in this study. Otherwise, Patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria and who have a catheter, urinary stent, or nephrostomy tube were excluded.

SAMPLE COLLECTION AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

Early morning mid-stream urine samples were collected using the sterile plastic disposable container and immediately transferred to the laboratory for investigation. Proper sampling instructions were given to each patient. [13] The collected urine specimens were subjected to general urine examinations using direct microscopy for white blood cells (WBCs) counting, then were inoculated on four types of media: Blood agar, Mannitol salt agar, MacConkey agar, and Cystine lactose electrolyte deficient agar CLED plates [14]. All inoculated plates were then incubated at 37° C for 24-48 hours for visible growth. Urine samples showing a colony count of more than 105cfu/mL were considered as positive pathogenic. The purified bacterial colonies were identified by gram staining, conventional biochemical procedures followed by a rapid biochemical test kit (API 20E). The Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [15]. The following antibiotics were used: Sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 25 μg), Nitrofurantoin (F; 300 μg), Amoxicillin (AML;25 μg), Coamoxclav (AMC; 30 μg), Tetracycline (TE;30 μg), Ciprofloxacin, (CIP; 5 μg), Doxacycline (DO; 30 μg), Metronidazole (MTZ; 2.5 μg), Ceftriaxone (CRO;30 μg), Cefixime CFM; 5 μg). Isolates were classified as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant according to the standardized table supplied [16]. A sterile cotton swab was used to streak the surface of Mueller Hinton agar plates. Filter paper disks containing a designated concentration of the antimicrobial drugs were placed on the agar surface using an aseptic technique. Interpretation of antibiotic results was done by measuring the diameter of the zone of inhibition and compared to the table of antibiotic sensitivity. Zones of inhibition of more than 18mm were considered sensitive, 13-18 mm intermediate, and < 13 mm resistant [14]. Multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains were defined as those which showed resistance to three or more of the tested antibiotics.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data were presented as frequency and percentages. Statistical analysis was performed using Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.

RESULTS

Out of 200 urine specimens were included, of which 110 were female and 90 were male aged between 30-70 years old. However, only 110 (55.00%) of the total samples were positive for bacterial growth, 22 (20.00%) were male and 88 (80.00%) were female while the other 90 (45.00%) samples had shown no bacterial growth.

Gram-negative bacteria had a higher frequency of occurrence than gram-positive constituting 67 (76.14%) in females while 21(23.86%) in males from total culture.

The most frequent Gram-negative isolates organisms were Escherichia coli (49, 55.68%), the second most prevalent isolate was Klebsiella pneumoniae 18, 20.46%) followed by Pseudomona aeruginosa (9, 10.23%), Proteus mirabilis (8, 9.09%), Enterobacter aerogenes (2, 2.27%), and Citrobacter freundii (2, 2.27%). Meanwhile, the commonest isolate gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (20, 90.91%) followed by S. saprophyticus (2, 9.09%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of bacterial agents isolated from urine specimens 

It was observed that Escherichia coli strains displayed relatively high antimicrobial resistance rates to Nitrofurantoin (61.22%), Ciprofloxacin (57.14%), Metronidazole (57.14%), Tetracycline (46.94%), and Ceftriaxone (44.90%) whereas it was least resistant to Doxacycline (8.16%). Klebsiella pneumonia were resistant to Nitrofurantoin (66.67%) followed by Amoxicillin (61.11%), Coamoxclav (61.11%), Tetracycline (55.56%), and Metronidazole (55.56%).

Among the Gram-positive isolates, S. aureus exhibited utmost resistance (80.00%) against Sulfamethoxazole, Ciprofloxacin (70.00%), Nitrofurantoin (60.00%), Ceftriaxone (60.00%), and had the lowest (25.00%) resistance to Amoxicillin and Tetracycline. S. saprophyticus presented moderately resistance to rate (50.00%) against Sulfamethoxazole, Amoxicillin, Metronidazole (Table 2). All other isolates were resistant to at least three antibiotics.

Table 2. Prevalence and antimicrobal resistance of bacterial agents isolated from urine species 

SXT: Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; F: Nitrofurantoin; AML: Amoxicillin; AMC: Coamoxclav; TE: Tetracycline; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; DO: Doxacycline; MTZ: Metronidazole; CRO: Ceftriaxone; CFM: Cefixime.

DISCUSSION

The misuse of antimicrobials to treat infections has a negative consequence on the organization of public health, as well as on the economic impact and the increase of drug resistance among causative bacteria. As a result, it is critical to continuously assess the state of antimicrobial resistance in a community, which was the study's first goal, especially in the case of UTIs.

The isolates obtained from UTIs in the current study demonstrated high resistance to different types of antibiotics. Most strains showed resistance to at least three antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is a common phenomenon in developing countries such as Libya where drugs are available freely without prescription.

In the present investigation, E. coli is the important uropathogen causative, displayed a similar resistance pattern as for Klebsiella, and was showed resistance to Nitrofurantoin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, and Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. This finding is inconsistent with the result obtained from previously reported in Libya which declared lower resistance rates for mentioned antibiotics [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. We also found that most uropathogens exhibited high sensitivity to Cefixime followed by Doxacycline which was in disagreement with other studies' outcome in Libya [17, 18, 19]. The drug susceptibility profile of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria tested in the present study was variable. For instance, increased bacterial resistance to ciprofloxacin has been shown. This study is opposite with the results reported by Elsayah et al [20] who revealed that Ciprofloxacin was the most effective antimicrobial agent. Therefore, we observed a higher frequency of ciprofloxacin-resistant in E. coli (57.14%) when compared to K. pneumoniae (16.67%). Meanwhile, S. aureus isolated strain also indicated higher resistance to ciprofloxacin (70.00%). The Specific ciprofloxacin resistance is also associated with chromosomal mutations altering DNA gyrasa and topoisomerase IV, overexpress efflux pumps, changing the number of porin sort, and transferring resistance to the plasmids' genes [21, 22]. Besides, most Gram-negative bacteria isolates in this study were resistant to three or more drugs [multi-drug resistance], as has been documented in other studies around the country [18, 19]. This demonstrates that multi-drug resistance is becoming a major issue in the treatment of uropathogens in Libya. This raises the need for national antimicrobial surveillance and in-vitro susceptibility testing program and strict adherence to antibiotic policy to prevent the spread of drug-resistant microbes in the region.

The gram-negative bacteria were the most common isolates in the current study, obtained in the present study was different in rates with other reports from different areas [18, 19, 23, 24]. This study detected the dominance of Escherichia coli (55.68%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (20.46%) (Table 1), which was almost identical compared with other research in Libya and other countries. In Northwest Libya, Abujnah et al have found a predominance of Escherichia coli (56%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (19%) [17]. In another study in Messalata, Libya, Mahammed et al have reported the predominance of Escherichia coli (56%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (17%) [18]. In Southern Tunisia, the authors have found Escherichia coli (68%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (13%) as predominance uropathogens among patients of UTIs [25]. A study in Iran has reported uropathogens with a predominance of Escherichia coli (38%) and Staphylococcus spp (35%). [26]. Staphylococcus aureus and S. saprophyticus were the most dominant Gram-positive uropathogen isolated in our study. Unlike in other studies which isolated coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Enterococcus as the most dominant Gram-positive uropathogen [27, 28].

Our study also showed a high prevalence of UTI in females than males 88 (80.00%) and 22 (20.00%) respectively which correlates with findings from other studies which revealed that the frequency of UTI is greater in females as compared to males [13, 29]. This result is also in agreement with what was previously reported by Mahmoud and colleagues in 2016. Many other researchers have also reported similar findings [2, 8, 30]. The reason behind this high prevalence of UTI in females is due to the proximity of the urethral meatus to the anus, shorter urethra, sexual intercourse, incontinence, and bad toilet [29]. Nowadays, numerous organizations and programs are working to fight against antibiotic resistance [31] but the first step to obtaining proper management and good control policy for decreasing the development of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms, particularly the pathogens is the evaluation and practical assessment of the antibiotic resistance patterns among definite populations of the patients of a country.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we evidenced that E. coli was the most prevalent isolate followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae. These two organisms were highly resistant to the commonly used antibiotics. In addition, these organisms exhibit resistance too many first-line drugs used for UTI infection. To prevent resistance to antibiotics, appropriate therapy as per bacterial sensitivity pattern needs to be initiated.

REFERENCES

1. Vasudevan R. Emergence of UTI causing Staphylococcus aureus as a superbug: Has the pathogen reduced the options of antimicrobial agents for treatment. EC Microbiol. 2015;1:88-112.Links ]

2. Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003.Links ]

3. Zone CP, Guide S. Antimicrobial resistance and urinary tract infections in the community. Signs. 2017;6:3531-93.Links ]

4. Mody L, Juthani-Mehta M. Urinary tract infections in older women: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311(8):844-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.303.Links ]

5. Sharma A, Chandraker S, Patel VK, Ramteke P. Antibacterial Activity of Medicinal Plants Against Pathogens causing Complicated Urinary Tract Infections. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(2):136-9. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.54279.Links ]

6. O'Grady MC, Barry L, Corcoran GD, Hooton C, Sleator RD, Lucey B. Empirical treatment of urinary tract infections: how rational are our guidelines? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(1):214-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky405.Links ]

7. Seifu WD, Gebissa AD. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Uropathogens from cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) in Shashemene referral hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2911-x.Links ]

8. Butler CC, Hawking MK, Quigley A, McNulty CA. Incidence, severity, help seeking, and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a population-based survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e702-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686965.Links ]

9. Butler CC, Francis N, Thomas-Jones E, Llor C, Bongard E, Moore M, et al. Variations in presentation, management, and patient outcomes of urinary tract infection: a prospective four-country primary care observational cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(665):e830-e841. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693641.Links ]

10. Sharif MR, Alizargar J, Sharif A. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of microbial agents that cause urinary tract infection. Middle East j Sci Res. 2013;17(11):1512-5.Links ]

11. World Organization Health. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance 2014. Available from: https://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/ (accessed March 2021).Links ]

12. Gágyor I, Bleidorn J, Kochen MM, Schmiemann G, Wegscheider K, Hummers-Pradier E. Ibuprofen versus fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h6544. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6544.Links ]

13. Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med. 2018;24(4):392-400. doi: 10.1038/nm.4517.Links ]

14. Sewify M, Nair S, Warsame S, Murad M, Alhubail A, Behbehani K, et al. Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility among Diabetic Patients with Controlled and Uncontrolled Glycemia in Kuwait. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:6573215. doi: 10.1155/2016/6573215.Links ]

15. Clinical and Laboratory standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Pennsylvania; 2016.Links ]

16. Karstens L, Asquith M, Caruso V, Rosenbaum JT, Fair DA, Braun J, et al. Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(12):735-49. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0104-z.Links ]

17. Abujnah AA, Zorgani A, Sabri MA, El-Mohammady H, Khalek RA, Ghenghesh KS. Multidrug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamases genes among Escherichia coli from patients with urinary tract infections in Northwestern Libya. Libyan J Med. 2015;10:26412. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v10.26412.Links ]

18. Mohammed MA, Alnour TM, Shakurfo OM, Aburass MM. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacterial strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Messalata Central Hospital, Libya. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016;9(8):771-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.06.011.Links ]

19. Salim FA, Murad SK Elbareg AM. Isolation of bacterial pathogens causing urinary tract infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients at Misurata teaching hsospital, Libya. Microbiol. Infect Dis. 2017;1(2):1-5.Links ]

20. Elsayah K, Atia A, Bkhait N. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacteria isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Tripoli city, Libya. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2017;7(4):1751-5.Links ]

21. Reis AC, Santos SR, Souza SC, Saldanha MG, Pitanga TN, Oliveira RR. Ciprofloxacin resistance pattern among bacteria isolated from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infection. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:53. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946201658053.Links ]

22. Bientinesi R, Murri R, Sacco E. Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin as a treatment for complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(6):637-44. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1720647.Links ]

23. Mostafa MM, Albakosh AM, Alrtail A, Rzeg MM, Aboukay AM. Etiology of uropathogenic bacteria in patients with urinary tract infection in Zliten, Libya. J Human Applied Sci. 2016;29:16-32.Links ]

24. Derese B, Kedir H, Teklemariam Z, Weldegebreal F, Balakrishnan S. Bacterial profile of urinary tract infection and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among pregnant women attending at Antenatal Clinic in Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:251-60. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S99831.Links ]

25. Guermazi-Toumi S, Boujlel S, Assoudi M, Issaoui R, Tlili S, Hlaiem ME. Susceptibility profiles of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in Southern Tunisia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;12:48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.004.Links ]

26. Mihankhah A, Khoshbakht R, Raeisi M, Raeisi V. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of bacteria isolated from urinary tract infections in Northern Iran. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:108. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_889_16.Links ]

27. Ayoyi AO, Kikuvi G, Bii C, Kariuki S. Prevalence, aetiology and antibiotic sensitivity profile of asymptomatic bacteriuria isolates from pregnant women in selected antenatal clinic from Nairobi, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:41. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.41.10975.Links ]

28. Okonko IO, Ijandipe LA, Ilusanya OA, Donbraye-Emmanuel OB, Ejembi J, Udeze AO, et al. Incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) among pregnant women in Ibadan, South-Western Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(23):6649-57.Links ]

29. Prakash D, Saxena RS. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial pathogens causing urinary tract infection in urban community of meerut city, India. ISRN Microbiol. 2013;2013:749629. doi: 10.1155/2013/749629.Links ]

30. Sood S, Gupta R. Antibiotic resistance pattern of community acquired uropathogens at a tertiary care hospital in jaipur, rajasthan. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.94023.Links ]

31. Lammie SL, Hughes JM. Antimicrobial Resistance, Food Safety, and One Health: The Need for Convergence. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2016;7:287-312. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033251.Links ]

Received: April 01, 2021; corrected: May 03, 2021; Accepted: May 24, 2021

Creative Commons License This is an open access article under the CC BY license