SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artÝculo

RUEDA LOPEZ, Justo et al. Dermatitis irritativa del pañal: Tratamiento local con productos barrera y calidad de vida. Gerokomos [online]. 2012, vol.23, n.1, pp.35-41. ISSN 1134-928X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1134-928X2012000100007.

    1. Soldevilla J, Torra J. Atención Integral a las Heridas Crónicas. Madrid: SPA S.L., 2004. [ Links ]

    2. Warshaw E, Nix D, Kula J, Markon DE. Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of a Cleanser Protectant Lotion for Treatment of Perineal Skin Breakdown in Low-Risk Patients with Incontinence. Ostomy/Wound Management 2002; 48: 44-51. [ Links ]

    3. Brown DS, Sears M. Perineal dermatitis: a conceptual framework. Ostomy/ Wound Management 1993; 39: 20-6. [ Links ]

    4. Faria DT, Shwayder T, Krull EA. Perineal skin injury: extrinsic environmental risk factors. Ostomy/Wound Management 1996; 42: 28-37. [ Links ]

    5. Langoen A. Dermatological problem and periwound skin. Worl Widw Wounds. November 2009; Consultado: 23 de julio 2010. [ Links ]

    6. Irvine C. 'Skin failure' - a real entity: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 1991; 84: 412-3. [ Links ]

    7. Flour M. The pathophysiology of vulnerable skin Worl Widw Wounds. September 2009; Consultado: 23 de julio 2010. [ Links ]

    8. Ryan TJ. Disability in dermatology. Br J Hosp Med 1991; 46: 33-6. [ Links ]

    9. Maklebust J, Magnan MA. Risk factors associated with having a pressure ulcer: a secondary data analysis. Advances in Wound Care 1994; 7: 25, 7-8, 31-4. [ Links ]

    10. Zehrer CL, Lutz JB, Hedblom EC, Ding L. Feature: Comparison of Cost and Efficacy of Three Incontinence Skin Barrier Products. Ostomy/Wound Management 2004; 50: 51-8. [ Links ]

    11. Soldevilla JJ, Torra JE, Rueda J, Martínez F, Verdú J, Mayán JM, López P. Segundo Estudio Nacional de Prevalencia de úlceras por Presión en España, 2005: epidemiología y variables definitorias de las lesiones y pacientes. Gerokomos 2006; 17: 154-72. [ Links ]

    12. Bliss DZ, Zehrer C, Savik K, Smith G, Hedblom E. An economic evaluation of four skin damage prevention regimens in nursing home residents with incontinence: economics of skin damage prevention. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 143-52. [ Links ]

    13. García Fernández FP, Pancorbo Hidalgo PL, Verdú Soriano J. Efectividad de la película barrera no irritante en la prevención de lesiones de piel: Revisión sistemática. Gerokomos 2009; 20: 29-40. [ Links ]

    14. Verdú J, García González F, Gago Fornells M, Rueda López J, Segovia Gómez T. Comparative study of a barrier product vs. zinc oxide cream for treatment of incontinence lesions. París: XIII EWMA Conference, 2004. [ Links ]

    15. Bale S, Tebble N, Jones V, Price P. The benefits of implementing a new skin care protocol in nursing homes. J Tissue Viability 2004; 14: 44-50. [ Links ]

    16. Baatenburg de Jong H, Admiraal H. Comparing cost per use of 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film with zinc oxide oil in incontinent patients. J Wound Care 2004; 13: 398-400. [ Links ]

    17. Bliss DZ, Zehrer C, Savik K, Smith G, Hedblom E. An economic evaluation of four skin damage prevention regimens in nursing home residents with incontinence: economics of skin damage prevention. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 143-52. [ Links ]

    18. Schuren J, Becker A, Sibbald RG. A liquid film-forming acrylate for peri-wound protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis (3M Cavilon no-sting barrier film). Int Wound J 2005; 2: 230-8. [ Links ]