SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

PEREZ GRANA, R. et al. Estimación de la incertidumbre global de un procedimiento para la determinación de humedad por gravimetría en platos preparados (Raciones individuales de combate). Sanid. Mil. [online]. 2012, vol.68, n.2, pp.73-78. ISSN 1887-8571.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1887-85712012000200003.

    1. UNE-EN ISO/IEC 17025. Requisitos generales relativos a la competencia de los laboratorios de ensayo y calibración. AENOR, Madrid. 2000. [ Links ]

    2. Vocabulario científico y técnico. Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Espasa. Madrid 1996. [ Links ]

    3. Bonet-Domingo E, Escuder-Gilabert L, Medina-Hernández MJ, Sagrado S. Uncertainty-Based Internal Quality Control. Harmonization considerations. Anal Chem 2006; 78:8113-8120. [ Links ]

    4. Thompson M, Fearn T. What Exactly is Fitness for Purpose in Analytical Measurement? Analyst 1996; 121:275-278. [ Links ]

    5. International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM), ISO, Gèneva, Switzerland, 1993. [ Links ]

    6. Thompson M. Comparability and traceability in analytical measurements and reference materials. Analyst 1997; 122:1201-1205. [ Links ]

    7. Barwick VJ, Ellison SLR, Rafferty MJQ, Rattanjit SG. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies. Part 2: The practical application of laboratory protocol. Accred Qual Assur 2000; 5: 104-113. [ Links ]

    8. Thompson M, Ellison S.L.R., Wood R.A. Harmonised Guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis. Pure Appl Chem 2002; 74 (5):835-855. [ Links ]

    9. ISO 3534-1. Statistics, Vocabulary and symbols. Genève. 1993. [ Links ]

    10. Thompson M. Analyst 1997; 122: 1201-1206. [ Links ]

    11. Maroto A, Boqué R, Riu J, Rius X. Evaluating uncertainty in routine analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1999; 18:577-584. [ Links ]

    12. De Melo Abreu, S, Caboni P, Cabras P, Garau VL, Alves A. Validation and global uncertainty of a liquid chromatographic with diode array detection method for the screening of azoxystrobin, kresosim-methyl, trifloxystrobin, famoxadone, pyraclostrobin and fenemidone in grapes and wine. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2006; 573-574:291-297. [ Links ]

    13. Serra R, Mendoça C, Abrunhosa L, Pietri A, Venâncio A. Determination of ochratoxin A in wine grapes: comparison of extraction procedures and method validation. Analytica Chimica Acta 2004; 513:41-47. [ Links ]

    14. Cowles JR, Daily S, Ellison SLR, Hardecastle W, Williams C. Experimental sensitivity analysis applied to sample preparation uncertainties: are ruggedness tests enough for measurement uncertainty estimates? Accred Qual Assur 2001; 6:368-371. [ Links ]

    15. Norma ISO 1442: 1997. Meat and meat products. Determination of moisture content. [ Links ]

    16. ISO Guide 5725-3:1994/Cor.1:2001. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. Part 3: Intermediate measures of the precision of a standard measurement method. Genève. [ Links ]

    17. Lyn J A, Ramsey MH, Fusell RJ, Wood R. Measurement uncertainty from physical sample preparation: estimation including systematic error. Analyst 2003; 128:1391-1396. [ Links ]

    18. Boqué R, Maroto A, Riu J, Rius X. Validation of analytical methods. Grasas y Aceites 2002; 53 (1): 128-143. [ Links ]

    19. BIPM, CEI, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, UICPA, UIPPA, OIML. Evaluation of measurement data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. First Edition 2008. [ Links ]

    20. Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Santos JR, Camoes GFC. Worst case uncertainty estimates for routine instrumental analysis. Analyst 2002; 127: 957-963. [ Links ]

    21. Maroto A, Boqué R, Riu J, Rius X. Effect of non-significant proportional bias in the final measurement uncertainty. Analyst 2003; 128:373-378. [ Links ]

    22. Fajgelj A, Ambras A. Project 5/2/99. Harmonised Guidelines for In-House Validation of Methods of Analysis. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. IUPAC. 1999. [ Links ]

    23. Kuttatharmmakul S, Massart DL, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Comparison of alternative measurement method: determination of the minimal number of measurements required for the evaluation of the by means of interval hypothesis testing. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems. 2000; 52:61-73. [ Links ]

    24. ISO Guide 5725-6:1994/Cor.1:2001. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. Part 3: Intermediate measures of the precision of a standard measurement method. Genève. [ Links ]

    25. Kuttatharmmakul S, Massart DL, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Comparison of alternative measurement methods. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1999; 391:203-225. [ Links ]

    26. Webster A. Estadística aplicada a los negocios y a la economía. Colombia: McGraw-Hill, 3a Edición 2000: 142-167. [ Links ]

    27. King B. Traceability of Chemical Analysis. Analyst 1997; 122: 197-204. [ Links ]

    28. Valcárcel M, Ríos A. Traceability in Analytical Chemistry. Analyst 1995; 2291-2297. [ Links ]

    29. King B. Metrology and analytical chemistry bridging the cultural gap. Metrologia 1997; 34:41-47. [ Links ]

    30. Vogl J, Ostermann M. On the measurement of the moisture content in different matrix materials. Accred Qual Assur 2006; 11: 356-362. [ Links ]

    31. Thompson M. Sense and traceability. Analyst 1996; 121:285-288. [ Links ]

    32. Kane JS. Analytical Bias: the Neglected Component of Measurement Uncertainty. Analyst 1997; 122: 1283-1288. [ Links ]

    33. Maroto A, Boqué R, Riu J, Rius X. Should non-significant bias be included in the uncertainty budget?. Accred and Qual Assur 2002; 7: 90-94. [ Links ]

    34. Milton JS. Estadística para la biología y ciencias de la salud. Madrid: Mc-Graw-Hill Interamericana. 3a Edición 2001; 512-542. [ Links ]

    35. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement ISO, Genève, 1993. [ Links ]

    36. Analytical Methods Committee. Uncertainty of Measurement: Implications of its use in Analytical Science. Analyst 1995; 120:2303-2308. [ Links ]

    37. Stepan R, Hajslova J, Kocourek V, Ticha J. Uncertainty of gas chromatographic measurement of troubles pesticide residues in apples employing conventional and mass spectrometric detectors. Analytica Chimica Acta 2004; 520: 245-255. [ Links ]

    38. Yenisoy-Karakas S. Validation and uncertainty assessment of rapid extraction and clean-up methods for the determination of 16 organochlorine pesticides residues in vegetables. Analytica Chimica Acta 2006; 571: 298-307. [ Links ]

    39. Ferrus R, Torrades F. Bias-free adjustement of analytical methods to laboratory samples in routine analytical procedures. Anal Chem 1988; 60:1281-1285. [ Links ]

    40. Lyn JA, Ramsey MH, Wood R. Optimised uncertainty in food analysis: application and comparison between four contrasting "analyte-commodity" combinations. Analyst 2002; 127:1252-1260. [ Links ]

    41. Lisinger TPJ, Führer M, Kander W, Schuhmacher R. Determination of measurement uncertainty for the determination of triazines in ground water from validation data. Analyst 2001; 126:211-216. [ Links ]

    42. Brix R, Hansen HS, Barwick V, Tjornelund J. Method optimisation with the use of uncertainty budgets. Analyst 2002; 127:140-143. [ Links ]

    43. Populaire S, Campos Giménez E. A simplified approach to the estimation of analytical measurement uncertainty. Accred Qual Assur 2006; 10:485-493. [ Links ]

    44. Ellison SLR, Barwick VJ. Using validation data for ISO measurement uncertainty estimation. Part 1. Principles of an approach using cause and effect analysis. Analyst 1998; 123: 1387-1392. [ Links ]

    45. Ellison SLR, Rosslein M, Williams A. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. 2a Edition. 2000. [ Links ]

    46. Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lino JM, Santos JR, Camoes FGFC. Estimation of precision and efficiency mass transfer steps for determination of pesticides in vegetables aiming at the expression of results with reliable uncertainty. Analyst 2000; 125: 1459-1464. [ Links ]

    47. Synek V. Effect of significant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability or uncertainty intervals. Part 1. Evaluation for given value of true bias. Talanta 2006; 70: 1024-1034. [ Links ]