SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Referencias del artículo

BLUM, G. Diego et al. Modelización de una Prueba de Analogías Figurales con la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem. Escritos de Psicología [online]. 2011, vol.4, n.3, pp.36-43. ISSN 1989-3809.

    1. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. En F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (pp. 397-479). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. [ Links ]

    2. Blum, G.D.; Abal, F.J.P.; Lozzia, G.S.; Picón Janeiro, J.C. & Attorresi, H.F. (2011). Analogías de figuras: Teoría y construcción de ítemes. Interdisciplinaria. Revista de psicología y ciencias afines, 28 (1), 131-144. [ Links ]

    3. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R.J. & Johnsen, S.K. (2000). TONI 2. Test de Inteligencia No Verbal. Apreciación de la habilidad cognitiva sin influencia del lenguaje. Manual. Madrid: TEA. [ Links ]

    4. Carmines, E.G. & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reiability and validity assessment. Londres: Sage. [ Links ]

    5. Cattell, R.B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [ Links ]

    6. Cattell, R.B. & Cattell, A.K.S. (1997). Factor "g" 2 y 3. Manual. Adaptación española: A. Cordero, M.V. De la Cruz, M. González & N. Seisdedos. Madrid: TEA. [ Links ]

    7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power Analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum. [ Links ]

    8. Coe, R. & Merino, C. (2003) Magnitud del efecto: Una guía para investigadores y usuarios. Revista de Psicología - PUCP, 21, 147-177. [ Links ]

    9. Cubillo, J.C. & González Labra, M.J. (1998). El razonamiento analógico como solución de problemas. En M.J. González Labra (Ed.), Introducción a la psicología del pensamiento (pp. 409-451). Madrid: Trotta. [ Links ]

    10. Elosua, P. (2003). Sobre la validez de los tests. Psicothema, 15, 315-321. [ Links ]

    11. Embretson, S.E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological bulletin, 93, 179-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.1.179 [ Links ]

    12. Embretson, S.E. (1984). A general latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika, 49, 175-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294171 [ Links ]

    13. Embretson, S.E. (1991). A multidimensional item response model for learning processes. Psychometrika, 56, 495-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294487 [ Links ]

    14. Embretson, S.E. & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. [ Links ]

    15. Enzmann, D. (2005). Dirk Enzmann - Statistical Software (Some Useful Things). Extraído el 1 de setiembre de 2010 de http://www2.jura.uni-hamburg.de/instkrim/kriminologie/Mitarbeiter/Enzmann/Software/Enzmann_Software.html [ Links ]

    16. Fischer, G. (1973). Linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(73)90003-6 [ Links ]

    17. Freund, P.A., Hofer, S. & Holling, H. (2008). Explaining and controlling for the psychometric properties of computer-generated figural matrix items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 195-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621607306972 [ Links ]

    18. García-Cueto, E. & Fidalgo, A.M. (2005). Análisis de los ítems. En J. Muñiz, A.M. Fidalgo, E. García-Cueto, R. Martínez y R. Moreno (Eds.), Análisis de los ítems (pp. 53-130). Madrid: La Muralla. [ Links ]

    19. Hanson, B.A. & Beguin, A.A. (2002). Obtaining a common scale for item response theory item parameters using separate versus concurrent estimation in the common-item equating design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621602026001001 [ Links ]

    20. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950). The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. En S. A. Stoufer et al. (Eds.). Measurement and Prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [ Links ]

    21. Lord, F.M. & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [ Links ]

    22. Martínez Arias, R. (1995). Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Madrid: Síntesis. [ Links ]

    23. Martínez Arias, R., Hernández Lloreda, M.V. & Hernández Lloreda, M.J. (2006). Psicometría. Madrid: Alianza. [ Links ]

    24. Mulholland, T.M., Pellegrino, J.W. & Glaser, G. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 252-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90011-0 [ Links ]

    25. Muñiz, J. (1994). Teoría clásica de test. Madrid: Pirámide. [ Links ]

    26. Pereda Marín, S. (1987). Psicología Experimental. Madrid: Pirámide. [ Links ]

    27. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhague: The Danish Institute for Educational Research. [ Links ]

    28. Raven, J.C., Court, J.H. & Raven, J. (1993). Test de matrices progresivas. Escalas coloreada, general y avanzada. Manual. Buenos Aires: Paidós. [ Links ]

    29. Raven, J., Raven, J.C. & Court, J.H. (1991). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press. [ Links ]

    30. Rivera, S. (2000). Las ciencias formales en la era posmoderna. En E. Díaz (Ed.). La posciencia: el conocimiento científico en las postrimetrías de la modernidad (pp. 83-113). Buenos Aires: Biblos. [ Links ]

    31. Spearman, C.E. (1904). General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412107 [ Links ]

    32. Spearman, C.E. (1907). Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412408 [ Links ]

    33. Spearman, C.E. (1913). Correlations of sums and differences. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 417-126. [ Links ]

    34. Spearman, C.E. (1923). The Nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. Londres: MacMillan. [ Links ]

    35. Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing and analogical reasoning: the componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [ Links ]

    36. Sternberg, R.J. (1987). Inteligencia humana II: Cognición, personalidad e inteligencia. Barcelona: Paidós. [ Links ]

    37. Thurstone, L.L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/214483 [ Links ]

    38. Waller, N.G. (1995). MicroFact 1.1. A microcomputer factor analysis program for ordered polytomous data and mainframe size problems. St. Paul Minessota: Assessment System Corporation. [ Links ]

    39. Whitely, S.E. & Schneider, L.M. (1981). Information structure for geometric analogies: A test theory approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 383-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168100500312 [ Links ]

    40. Wolf Nelson, N. & Gillespie, L.L. (1991). Analogies for thinking and talking. Words, pictures and figures. Tucson: Communication Skill Builders. [ Links ]

    41. Yen, W.M. (1987). A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of BILOG and LOGIST. Psychometrika, 52, 275-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294241 [ Links ]

    42. Zimowski, M., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R. y Bock, R. (1996). BILOG-MGTM: Multiple-group IRT analysis and test maintenance for binary items [Computer program]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. [ Links ]