Scielo RSS <![CDATA[Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/rss.php?pid=1575-062020150002&lang=en vol. 17 num. 2 lang. en <![CDATA[SciELO Logo]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/img/en/fbpelogp.gif http://scielo.isciii.es <![CDATA[<b>Professional ethics are needed to be a good physician</b>]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202015000200001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en <![CDATA[<b>Treatment guidelines for Hepatitis C in Spain</b>]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202015000200002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en The discovery of new orally administered drugs that can block different targets of the replication cycle of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) with major antiviral activity, has revolutionized treatment of this infection and relegated interferon-based treatments to a secondary position. The start up of the National Strategic Plan for Combating Hepatitis C, which acknowledges the greater efficacy and safety of oral antiviral drugs, as well as the agreements between the pharmaceutical companies and different government bodies has enabled the initial difficulties of access to these medicines due to their high cost to be overcome. In this rapidly changing environment, the availability of a therapeutic guide based on a critical analysis of the available evidence, takes on special relevance and provides a basic support for medical practitioners involved in HCV treatment. However, the speed with which new therapeutic options are included and the limited evidence in some clinical scenarios signifies a challenge for those responsible for scientific societies whose job it is to coordinate the preparation of therapeutic guides and to keep recommendations up to date. In this review we analyze the treatment recommendations for HCV in a consensus document drawn up by the Spanish Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AEEH), to contrast them with recommendations given by American and European associations that study hepatic diseases. <![CDATA[<b>Professional deontology and medical practice in prisons</b>]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202015000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Objective: To study the knowledge on professional deontology amongst doctors in prisons. Materials and Method: Descriptive, transversal and multi-centre study. Labour, collegiate, social, demographic and deontological variables were collected. A descriptive analysis of the variables was performed. A bivariate analysis was made by binary logistic regression models, attending to the odds ratio, and assuming a 95% confidence interval. Data was processed by SPSS v.20 software. Results: 118 doctors replied. 68 men (57.6%), with an average age of 51 years (50-53). 100 know about the Deontology Committee (84.7%), but just 77 (65.3%) know its functions properly. 42 (35.6%) know about the existence of the Deontological Code, and 37 (31.3%) have read and apply it. Those who made a correct definition of deontology do find more deontological issues in their daily work [23(46.9%) vs. 18(26.1%); OR: 2.506; IC95%: 1.153-5.451; p=0.020] and would denounce a colleague more often to the Medical Association [40(81.6%) vs. 42 (60.9%); OR: 2.857; IC95%: 1.197-6.819; p=0.018]. Older ones know more about the deontology commissions' functions [54(73%) vs. 23(52.3%); OR: 2.465; IC95%: 1.127-5.394; p=0.024] and have already denounced situations to the Medical Association [27(36.5% vs. 5(11.4%); OR: 4.481; IC95%: 1.577-12.733; p=0.005], but think that a different Care Ethics Committee is unnecessary [57(77%) vs. 42(95.5%); OR: 0.160; IC95%: 0.035- 0.729; p=0.018]. Conclusions: Prison doctors know little about what professional deontology really is. This knowledge increases with age in the profession and is associated with an increased perception of deontological issues in daily practice. <![CDATA[<b>Self-harm in children placed in a Court-Mandated Holding and Education Centre</b>: <b>analysis of socio-demographic variables and influence of implementation of judicial measures</b>]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202015000200004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en Objectives: To analyze and understand the existence of self-harming behavior in a detention centre for minors. Methods: Review of self-harm cases detected in a population of 94 inmates in 2013. Results: 26.5% of young offenders have conducted some form of self injury. 28% of individuals with self harming behaviors have more than 6 episodes over the period of internment. Self-beating is the most common type of self-harm performed by this group. Inmates serving sentences in the therapeutic section tend to present spillover effects in terms of self-injury. Discussion: The population held in prison show higher percentages of self-harm than amongst the general population. The chosen type of behavior is determined by the institution. Inmates that present greater mental fragility tend to perform these behaviors and in greater number. <![CDATA[<b>Chronicity and primary care</b>: <b>the role of prison health</b>]]> http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202015000200005&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en The Prison Primary Health Care Teams in Catalonia have been integrated into the Catalan Health Institute. This integration shall facilitate¹ training and updating, while eliminating the existing differences between the health services belonging to prison institutions and those of the Catalan Health Service. It shall enable team work and coordination between Primary Health Care Teams in the community and the PHCTs in prisons within the same geographical area by sharing ongoing training, multi-sector work teams and territory-based relations, thereby facilitating continuance in care and complete and integrated treatment of chronicity. The existing information systems in Primary Health Care and the shared clinical history in Catalonia are key factors for this follow up process. Support tools for clinical decision making shall also be shared, which shall contribute towards an increase in quality and clinical safety. These tools include electronic clinical practice guides, therapeutic guides, prescription alert systems, etc. This shall be an opportunity for Prison Health Care Teams to engage in teaching and research, which in turn shall have an indirect effect on improvements in health care quality and the training of professionals in this sector. The critical factor for success is the fact that a unique chronicity health care model shall be shared, where measures for health promotion prevention can be taken, along with multi-sector monitoring of pathologies and with health care information shared between professionals and levels throughout the patient's life, both in and out of the prison environment.