Objective:

To identify the best available evidence related to interventions for the acceptance of the prostate-specific antigen test.

Methodology:

Rapid literature review following the steps established by Tapia-Benavente, which are: 1.- research question, for which the PICO structure limited to the definition of the problem, intervention, and result was used; 2.- bibliography search in recognized databases; 3.- study selection and data extraction; 4.- bias risk assessment, for which the CONSORT group clinical trial verification guidelines were used; and 5.- preparation of a summary and conclusion of the evidence found.

Results:

The rapid literature search yielded a total of 51 publications from three databases, PubMed (27), EBSCO (13), and SCOPUS (11); 11 of which met the inclusion criteria. One hundred percent of the studies indicated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (p < .05). The most frequently used strategies included home visits, conferences, group discussions, brainstorming, question-and-answer dynamics with slides, as well as the use of educational brochures, and were carried out in a period of one day and up to six months.

Conclusions:

There is an evident knowledge gap in the development and implementation of strategies for Prostate Cancer prevention behavior directed to indigenous men, as well as a lack of nursing intervention models focused on this disease.

        · |     · | |     · ( pdf ) | ( pdf )