SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.72 issue5Pelvic congestion syndrome: updated literature reviewThe dark spots of pelvic venous insufficiency author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Angiología

On-line version ISSN 1695-2987Print version ISSN 0003-3170

Abstract

BALLESTEROS-POMAR, Marta et al. Update and decision making algorithms on the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Angiología [online]. 2020, vol.72, n.5, pp.240-252.  Epub Nov 30, 2020. ISSN 1695-2987.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/angiologia.00138.

A ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a highly lethal event remaining associated with a high overall mortality, in spite of the reduction in the mortality from rAAA over the last two decades linked with the adoption of an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as the forefront strategy, as well as the advances in perioperative critical care practices.

Management of a rAAA can be divided into four stages: diagnosis, perioperative management, surgical repair and postoperative period. Within the framework of American and European clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms and NICE guideline, all of them recently published, updated critical issues for each stage are shown. From the key role of CT angiogram for the diagnosis to the postoperative complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome

The creation of evidence-based protocols and algorithms for rapid diagnosis and treatment aids to make decisions and at the same time it will reduce the time since diagnosis to control of hemorrhage, which is essential for survival.

Keywords : Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; EVAR; Guidelines; Decision making algorithm.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )