SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.58 issue6Clinical management of the living donor kidney transplant recipientDonor outcomes after nephrectomy: Operative and postoperative morbidity-mortality and long-term impact of nephrectomy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Archivos Españoles de Urología (Ed. impresa)

Print version ISSN 0004-0614

Abstract

CRESPO BARRIO, Marta; ESFORZADO ARMENGOL, Nuria; RICART BRULLES, Maria José  and  OPPENHEIMER SALINAS, Federico. Long term results of living donor kidney transplantation: Graft and patient survival. Arch. Esp. Urol. [online]. 2005, vol.58, n.6, pp.537-542. ISSN 0004-0614.

Donor kidney transplantation’s graft and patient survivals are better than cadaver donor’s. In Spain, living donor kidney transplantation hardly accounts for 1% of transplant activity in comparison to 60% in United States. Accordingly to bibliography, the experience of the Renal Transplant Unit of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona has demonstrated better graft and receptor survival for living donor recipients. The analysis of 184 living donor kidney transplants and 1678 cadaver donor transplants performed between 1978 and 2002 showed that graft survival was higher in the group of living donors (p < 0.01). At the same time, graft survival was clearly better in receptors of HLA haploidentical grafts (n =142) (p < 0.05). The introduction of new and better immunosuppressive drugs, as well as better diagnostic and therapeutic management of acute rejection, prophylaxis for infections, and control of complications have contributed to better results. The absence of acute rejection between 1978 and 1983 was 45.1%, between 1984 and 1998 was 57.3% and 84.7% between 1999 and 2003.In conclusion, these results demonstrate better graft and patient survival for living donor kidney transplants in comparison with cadaver donor receptors. Altogether with the low risk involved for donors should incentivate authorities, professionals, and patients to promote these therapeutic option by means of adequate information and wider diffusion. Living donor kidney transplantation should contribute together with cadaver kidney transplantation to lessen our long waiting lists, because they are not excluding options.

Keywords : Living donor kidney transplantation; Graft survival; Patient survival.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License