SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue6The treatment of prostatic cancer: present and future, realities and possibilitiesRobotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Actas Urológicas Españolas

Print version ISSN 0210-4806

Abstract

JOHN, H.; SCHMID, D.M.  and  FEHR, J.L.. Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy Da Vinci. Actas Urol Esp [online]. 2007, vol.31, n.6, pp.580-586. ISSN 0210-4806.

Objetive. To report the outcomes of 100 robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALPs), a minimally invasive alternative for treating prostate cancer. Patients and methods. In all patients was used RALP with an extraperitoneal approach assisted by the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Prospective data collection included quality-of-life questionnaires, basic demographics (height, weight and body mass index), prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stage and Gleason grade. Variables assessed during RALP were operative duration, estimated blood loss (EBL) and complications, and after RALP were hospital stay, catheter time, pathology, PSA level, return of continence and potency. Results. The mean (range) duration of RALP was 180 (140-295) min; all procedures were successful, with no intraoperative transfusions or deaths. The mean EBL was 300 mL (40 - 1100); 97% of patients were discharged home on the first day after RALP with a mean haematocrit of 36%. The mean duration of catheterization was 7 (5-21) days. The positive margin rate was 14% for all patients. The overall biochemical recurrence free (PSA level < 0.1 ng/mL) survival was 95% at mean follow-up of 9.7 months. There was complete continence at 6 months in 95% of patients. At 1 year 78% of patients were potent (with or without the use of oral medications), 15% were not yet able to sustain erections capable of intercourse, and another 7% still required injection therapy. Conclusion. RALP is a safe, feasible and minimally invasive alternative for treating prostate cancer. Our initial experience with the procedure shows promising short-term outcomes.

Keywords : Robotical radical prostatectomy; Da Vinci; Extraperitoneal access.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License