SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue6The efficacy of caloric intake in critically ill patients with traumatic pathologyPerception of obese schoolchildren regarding their participation in the Physical Education class and their level of self-esteem: comparison according to corporal status author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Nutrición Hospitalaria

On-line version ISSN 1699-5198Print version ISSN 0212-1611

Abstract

MORETTI, Dino et al. Relationship between the NUTRIC nutritional risk scale and protein hypercatabolism in critically ventilated patients. Nutr. Hosp. [online]. 2018, vol.35, n.6, pp.1263-1269.  Epub Feb 03, 2020. ISSN 1699-5198.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.1938.

Introduction:

the Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score does not include a variable that objectively estimates protein hypercatabolism (PHC), one of the main metabolic changes experienced by critical patients.

Objective:

to evaluate the correlation of the NUTRIC score with PHC in critically ventilated patients.

Material and methods:

prospective, observational study. Mixed ICU. It included ventilated patients ≥ 18 years old, without anuria or chronic renal failure. The modified NUTRIC score, which replaces IL-6 for PCR, was obtained at admission and 24-hour urine was collected at the 2nd (T0) and 4th day (T1) to determine the total urinary nitrogen (TUN).

Results:

a total of 69 patients were included. Average age: 43 years (± 17.01); 73% were males. Admission pathologies: trauma (39%) and sepsis (20%). APACHE II: 17 (± 6.66). Seventeen patients presented acute renal failure (ARF). NUTRIC score mean: 3.13 (± 1.94); 84% presented low nutritional risk. The Pearson correlation between NUTRIC and TUN in T0 and T1 was: -0.150 (p: 0.218) and -0.053 (p: 0.663). The mean length of staying in ICU and mechanical ventilation was: 13.35 (± 12.37) and 9.84 (± 10.82) days, respectively. Mortality in ICU: 36%. In the non-ARF subgroup with low risk according to NUTRIC score, 27% presented severe PHC at T0 and 52% at T1. The correlation was: 0.070 (p: 0.620) and 0.138 (p: 0.329), respectively.

Conclusion:

no correlation was found between the estimators of the stress metabolic response of the NUTRIC score and the PHC in critically ill patients ventilated; therefore, it would not be possible to substitute the measurement of the same in the assessment of the nutritional risk

Keywords : Nutritional assessment; Critical disease; Inflammation; Metabolism; Nutritional support.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )